Skip to main content

In Vitro Gallstone Lithotripsy: Effect of Peripheral Calcification on Fragmentation and Sonographic Evaluation of Fragment Size

  • Chapter
  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

Twenty-one gallstones were fractured by shock wave lithotripsy in vitro to study the effect of calcification on fragmentation and to assess the use of sonography for the evaluation of fragment size. Roentgenograms were made of 21 surgically removed gallstones, ranging from 9 mm to 13 mm in diameter, which had been placed in a water bath. The amount and extent of calcification were determined by study of the radiographs. Then the stones were placed into a water-filled condom, lowered into a water bath under ultrasound guidance, and fractured by a commercially available shock wave gallstone lithotripsy device. All stones required from one to 42 shock waves (SW) for initial fragmentation and from six to 888 SW for complete fragmentation (using ultrasound imaging, all fragments estimated to be < 5 mm). Stones with a calcified rim required an average of three times as many SW (P < .05) as non-calcified stones for initial fracture, but no significant difference in number of SW was required for complete fragmentation (median 61 SW v 64 SW).

Seven observers, six radiologists, and one radiology resident attempted to determine from post-lithotripsy sonograms the largest fragment size in the presence of multiple fragments in 14 of the fragmented stones. Thirteen of the stones had an actual largest fragment size larger than 5 mm in diameter, however, there was no correlation (r = .15) between actual fragment size and the assessment of fragment size by the observers. In particular convexoconcave-shaped fragments caused difficulty for observers in estimating fragment size in the presence of multiple fragments, because the ultrasound image of the fractured face of the stone may appear to be multiple smaller fragments. Therefore, it can be concluded that sonography tends to underestimate the fragment size during lithotripsy, and for complete fragment evaluation, multiple views of the fragments should be obtained by changing the position of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brink JA, Simeone JF, Mueller PR, et al: Physical characteristics of gallstones removed at cholecystectomy: implications for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. AJR 151: 927, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eusek JF, Bush WH, Burnett LL, et al: In-bath filming during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Radiology 158: 850, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrucci JT: Biliary lithotripsy: what will the issues be? AJR 149: 227, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrucci JT: Gallstone ESWL: the first 175 patients. AJR 150: 1231, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sackmann M, Delius M, Sauerbruch T, et al: Shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones: the first 175 patients. NEJM 318: 393, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward RN, Brogden RC, Heel TM, et al: Ursodeoxycholic acid: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 27: 95, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schachler R, Sauerbruch T, Wosiewitz U, et al: Fragmentation of gallstones using extracor- poreal shock wave: an in vitro study. Hepatology 8: 925, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grantham JR, Millner MR, Kaude JV, et al: Renal stone disease treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: short-term observations in 100 patients. Radiology 158: 203, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akers SR, Cocks FH, Weinerth JL: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the use of chemical treatments for improved stone comminution. J Urol 138: 1295, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Neubrand M, Sauerbruch T, Stellaard F, et al: In vitro cholesterol gallstone dissolution after fragmentation with shock waves. Digestion 34: 51, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gelfand DW, McCullough DL, Myers RT, et al: Choledocholithiasis: successful treatment with extracorporeal lithotripsy. AJR 148: 1114, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeman RK, Davros WJ, Garra BS, et al: Observations of stone motion and the stone recoil phenomenon: implications for gallstone lithotripsy. Radiology 169: 190, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garra BS, Davros WJ, Zeman RK, et al: US and fluoroscopic visualization of gallstone fragments: implications for monitoring of gallstone lithotripsy. Radiology 169: 154, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davros WJ, Marchand T, Zeman RK, et al: Gallstone lithotripsy: relationship between stone morphology and fragmentation. Radiology 169: 381, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, J.C., Burnett, D.A., Matamoros, A., Peters, B., Nelson, S. (1989). In Vitro Gallstone Lithotripsy: Effect of Peripheral Calcification on Fragmentation and Sonographic Evaluation of Fragment Size. In: Lingeman, J.E., Newman, D.M. (eds) Shock Wave Lithotripsy 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2054-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2052-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics