Advertisement

The Simulation of Polymer Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media

  • K. S. Sorbie
  • P. J. Clifford
Chapter

Abstract

In this paper, some recent progress is described with a programme of study on polymer flow in heterogeneous (layered) porous media. This work has used numerical simulation, including models for all the main polymer phenomena, in order to establish recovery mechanisms in polymer flooding. Fluid crossflow is central to the recovery mechanisms in stratified systems with communicating layers. Scaling theory has been used to establish the relative magnitude of the various crossflow effects at both the field and laboratory scale. A combination of simulation and scaling theory has enabled us to define appropriate laboratory experiments, which reproduce the main reservoir features in a correctly scaled way. Some experimental results are presented and analysed by computer simulation.

Keywords

Mobility Ratio Permeability Layer Polymer Flood Polymer Flow Polymer Injection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zeito, G. A., “Three Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Polymer Flooding in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Systems”, SPE 2186, 43rd Ann. Fall Conf. of SPE, Houston, Texas, Sept. 27-Oct. 2, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slater, G. E. and Farouq-Ali, S. M., “Two Dimensional Polymer Flood Simulation”, SPE 3033, 45th Ann. Fall Conf. of SPE, Houston, Texas, 4–7 Oct., 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jewett, R. L. and Shurz, A. F., “Polymer Flooding: A Current Appraisal”, J. Pet. Tech., p 675–683, June 1970.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patton, J. T., Coats, K. H. and Colegrove, G. T., “Prediction of Polymer Flood Performance”, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., p 72–84, March 1971.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bondor, P. L., Hirasaki, G. J. and Tham, M. J., “Mathematical Simulations of Polymer Flooding in Complex Reservoirs”, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., p 369–382, October 1972.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vela, S., Peaceman, D. W. and Sandvik, E. I., “Evaluation of Polymer Flooding in a Layered Reservoir with Crossflow, Retention and Degradation”, SPE 5102, 49th Ann. Fall Conf. of SPE, Houston, Texas, 6–9 Oct., 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Todd, M. R., and Chase, C. A., “A Numerical Simulator for Predicting Chemical Flood Performance”, SPE 7689, 5th Symp. on Reservoir Simulation of SPE, Denver, Colorado, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naiki, M., “Numerical Simulation of Polymer Flooding Including the Effects of Salinity”, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, August 1979.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    VAN Poolen, H. K., “Fundamentals of EOR”, Chapter 5, Penwell Books, Tulsa, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandvik, E. I. and Maerker, J. M., “Application of Xanthan Gum for EOR”, ACS Symposium Series No 45, Extracellular Microbial Polyaccharides, Eds P. A. Sandford and A. Laskin, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heemskerk, J., Janssen van Rosmalen, R., Holtslag, R. J. and Teew, D., “Quantification of Viscoelastic Effects of Polyacrylamide Solutions”, SPE/DOE 12652, presented at SPE/DOE 4th Symp. on EOR, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 15–18 April, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chauveteau, G. and zaitoun, A., “Basic Rheological Behaviour of Xanthan Polysaccharide Solutions in Porous Media: Effects of Pore Size and Polymer Concentration”, Proc. of 1st European Symp. on EOR, Bournemouth, England, September 1981.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chauveteau, G., “Rodlike Polymer Solution Flow Through Fine Pores; Influence of Pore Size on Rheological Behaviour”, J. Rheol., 26, p111, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Southwick, J. G. and manke, C. W., “Molecular Degradation, Injectivity and Elastic Properties of Polymer Solutions”, SPE 15652, presented at 61st SPE Annual Fall Conference, New Orleans, 5–8 October, 1986.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Szabo, M. T., “An Evaluation of Water Soluble Polymers for Secondary Oil Recovery Parts I and II”, J. Pet. Tech., pp 553–570, May 1979.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sorbie, K. S., parker, A. and CLIFFORD, P. J., “Experimental and Theoretical Study of Polymer Flow in Porous Media”, SPE 14231, presented at 60th Annual Fall Conference of SPE, Las Vegas, 22–25 September, 1985.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dawson, R. and Lantz, R. B., “Inaccessible Pore Volume in Polymer Flooding”, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., pp 448–452, October 1972.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shah, B. N., Willhite, G. P. and Green, D. W., “The Effect of Inaccessible Pore Volume on the Flow of Polymer and Solvent Through Porous Media”, SPE 7586, presented to 53rd SPE Ann. Fall Conf., Houston, Texas, October 1978.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    davison, P. and Mentzer, E., “Polymer Flooding in North Sea Oil Reservoirs”, SPE 9300, presented at the 55th Annual Fall Conference of SPE-AIME, Dallas, Texas, 1980.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    akstinat, M. H., “Polymers for FOR in Reservoirs of Extremely High Salinities and Temperatures”, SPE 8979, SPE Int. Symp. on Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry, Stanford, California, 28–30 May, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASH, S. G., clarke-sturman, A. J., Calvert, R. and nisbet, T.M., “Chemical Stability of Biopolymer Solutions”, SPE 12085, 58th Ann. Fall Conf. of SPE, San Francisco, California, 5–8 October, 1983.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Batycky, J. P., Maini, B. B. and Milosz, G., “A Study of the Application of Polymeric Gels in Porous Media”, SPE 10620, presented at SPE Int. Symp. on Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry, Dallas, Texas, January 1982.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Navratil, M., Sovak, M. and mitchell, M. S., “Diverting Agents for Sweep Improvements in Flooding Operations - Laboratory Studies”, SPE 10621, presented at SPE Int. Symp. on Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry, Dallas, Texas, January 1982.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brown, C. E., Christie, M. A. and Gatt, A. M., “Reservoir Temperature Distributions Around Injection Wells; Effect on EOR Schemes”, presented at 2nd European Symposium on EOR, Paris, 8–10 November, 1982.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sorbie, K. S., Roberts, L. J. and Foulser, R. W. S., “Polymer Flooding Calculations for Highly Stratified Brent Sands in the North Sea”, presented at 2nd European Symposium on EOR, Paris, 8–10 November, 1982.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scott, T., Roberts, L. J., sharpe, S. R., Clifford, P. J. and Sorbie, K. S., “In Situ Gel Calculations in Complex Reservoir Systems Using a New Chemical Flood Simulator”, SPE 14234, presented at 60th Annual Fall Conference of SPE, Las Vegas, 22–25 September, 1985.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scott, T., Sharpe, S. R., Sorbie, K. S., Clifford, P. J., ROBERTS, L. J., Foulser, R. W. S. and Oakes, J., “A General Purpose Chemical Flood Simulator”, SPE 16029, presented at SPE Numerical Simulation Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 2–4 February, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clifford, P. J. and Sorbie, K. S., “The Effects of Chemical Degradation on Polymer Flooding”, SPE 13586, presented at SPE Int. Symp. on Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry, Phoenix, Arizona, 9–11 April, 1985.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Clifford, P. J. and Sorbie, K. S., “Polymer Flooding in Stratified Systems: Recovery Mechanisms and the Effects of Chemical Degradation”, presented to IEA Collaborative Project on EOR, Trondheim, Norway, 4–5 October, 1984.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zapata, V. J. and lake, L. W., “A Theoretical Analysis of Viscous Crossflow”, SPE 10111, 56th Ann. Fall Conf. of SPE, San Antonio, Texas, 5–7 October, 1981.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yokoyama, and lake, L. W., “The Effects of Capillary Pressure on Immiscible Displacements in Stratified Permeable Media”, SPE 10109, presented at 56th Annual Fall Conference of SPE, San Antonio, Texas, 5–7 October, 1981.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    CRAIG, F. F., Sanderlin, J. L. and Moore, D. W. “A Laboratory Study of Gravity Segregation in Frontal Drives”, Trans. AIME 210, p275, 1957.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goddin, C. S., Craig, F. F., Wilkes, J. O. and Tek, M. R., “A Numerical Study of Waterflood Performance in a Stratified System with Crossflow”, J. Pet. Tech., 18, p765, 1966.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koonce, K. T. and Blackwell, R. J., “Idealised Behaviour of Solvent Banks in Stratified Reservoirs”, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 1, pp 318–328, December, 1965: Trans. Aime, 234, p318, 1965.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wheat, M. R. and Dawe, R. A., “Transverse Dispersion in Slug Mode Chemical EOR Processes in Stratified Porous Media”, SPE 14890, presented at 5th SPE/DOE Symposium on EOR, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 20–23 April, 1986.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Evans, A. J., Sorbie, K. S. and Clifford, P. J., “Scaling Relations for Water and Polymer Floods in Stratified Systems”, AEE Winfrith M2143, January 1985.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leverett, M. C., lewis, W. B. and True, M. E., “Dimensional Model Studies of Oil-Field Behaviour”, Trans. AIME 146, p175, 1942.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rapoport, L. A., “Scaling Laws for Use in Design and Operation of Water - Oil Flow Models”, Trans. AIME 204, p143, 1955.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Geertsma, J., Croes, G. A. and Schwarz, N., “Theory of Dimensionally Scaled Models of Petroleum Reservoirs”, Trans. AIME, 207, p118, 1956.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Engelberts, W. F. and Klinkenberg, L. J., “Laboratory Experiments on the Displacement of Oil by Water, from Packs of Granular Material”, Proc. Third World Petr. Congress, The Hague, Section II, 544, 1951.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bentsen, R. G., “Scaled Fluid-Flow Models with Permeabilities Differing from that of the Prototype”, J. Can. Pet. Tech., 15, No. 3, p46, 1976.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Croes, G. A. and Schwartz, N., “ Dimensionally Scaled Experiments and the Theories on the Water Drive Process”, Trans. AIME, 204, p35, 1955.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Perkins, F. M. and Collins, R. E., “Scaling Laws for Laboratory Flow Models of Oil Reservoirs”, Trans. Aime, 219, p383, 1960.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gaucher, D. H. and Lindley, D. C., “Waterflood Performance in a Stratified Five-Spot Reservoir - A Scaled Model Study”, Trans. AIME, 219, p208, 1960.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    VAN Meurs, P., “The User of Transparent Three Dimensional Models for Studying the Mechanism of Flow Processes in Oil Reservoirs”, Trans. AIME, 210, p295, 1957.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Richardson, J. G. and Perkins, F. M., “A Laboratory Investigation on the Effect of Rate on Recovery of Oil by Waterflooding”, Trans. AIME, 210, p114, 1957.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Carpenter, C. W., Bail, P. T. and BOBECK, J. E., “A Verification of Waterflood Scaling in Heterogeneous Communicating Flow Models”, Soc. Pet. E.g. J., p9, 1962.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Griffith, J. D. and Fitch, R. A., “Experimental and Calculated Performance of Miscible Floods in Stratified Reservoirs”, J. Pet. Tech., p1289, November 1964.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Root, P. J. and Skiba, F. F., “Crossflow Effects During an Idealised Displacement Process in a Stratified Reservoir”, Trans. AIME, 234, p229, 1965.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Craig, F. F., “The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding”, Vol. 3. H. L. Doherty Series, SPE of AIME, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    wright, R. J., Wheat, M. R. and Dawe, R. A., “Slug Size and Mobility Requirements for Chemically Enhanced Oil Recovery within Heterogeneous Reservoirs”, SPE 13704, presented at SPE Middle East Oil Technical Conference, Bahrain, 11–14 March, 1985.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    wright, R. J. and dawe, R. A., “Fluid Displacement Efficiency in Layered Porous Media; Mobility Ratio Influence”, Rev. Inst. Fr. du Pétrole, 38, pp 455–474, July 1983.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    novosad, J, “The Effect of Rock Heterogeneity and Wettability on Chemical Flooding”, presented at 5th Annual Meeting of IEA on EOR, Trondheim, Norway, 4–5 October, 1984.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sandiford, B. B., “Polymer Selection for Mobility and Sweep Improvement Processes”, presented at the ACS Meeting, New York City, August, 1981.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Szabo, M. T., “Laboratory Investigations of Factors Influencing Polymer Flood Performance”, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., pp 338–346, August 1975.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    lever, A. and Dawe, R. A., “Water Sensitivity and Migration of Fines in the Hopeman Sandstone”, J. Petrol Geol., 7, No 1, pp 97–107, Jan. 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chauveteau, G. and Kohler, N., “Influence of Microgels in Xanthan Polysaccharide Solutions on their Flow Through Various Porous Media”, SPE 9295, presented at SPE 55th Ann. Fall Conf., Dallas, 21–24 September, 1980.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sorbie, K. S., Wat, R. M. S., rowe, T. and Clifford, P. J., “Core Floods in Well Characterised Heterogeneous Systems: Experimental and Simulation Results”, SPE 16275, presented at SPE Int. Symp. on Oilfield Chemistry, San Antonio, Texas, 4–6 Feb., 1987.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Arya, A. Hewitt, T. A., Larson, R. and Lake, L. W., “Dispersion and Reservoir Heterogeneity”, SPE 14364, presented at 60th Annual Fall Conference on SPE, Las Vegas, Nevada, 22–25 September, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. S. Sorbie
    • 1
  • P. J. Clifford
    • 1
  1. 1.AEE WinfrithDorsetEngland

Personalised recommendations