Advertisement

University of Virginia Lithostar Experience: Preliminary Report

  • Alan D. Jenkins

Abstract

The Siemens Lithostar system consists of a motorized patient table, two integral electromagnetic shock wave generators, and biplane fluoroscopy for stone localization. Shock wave coupling is through water-filled bellows attached to the shock tubes. Seven of the first 30 patients (21%) required more than one treatment, even though the mean stone size was less than 13 mm. Seven other patients had poor fragmentation: all had 4 mm to 5 mm fragments. The mean number of shock waves delivered was 3,100.

The unit was realigned six weeks after the first patient was treated. Pulverization was excellent in the first 30 patients who were treated after this optimization procedure. Mean stone size was 10 mm, and the mean number of shock waves delivered was 2,700.

The Lithostar can effectively pulverize most upper urinary tract calculi. The modest shock wave pressures minimize the need for anesthesia but may hinder the treatment of impacted ureteral stones or difficult-to-fragment renal calculi.

The first extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter to use electromagnetic shock wave generation was developed by the Siemens Corporation at the Department of Urology of Mainz University under the direction of Prof. Rudolf Hohenfellner.1 Clinical trials were initiated in 1986 in West Germany. The first two Lithostars in the United States were installed at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and the University of Virginia School of Medicine in Charlottesville, Virginia. Clinical trials began at the University of Virginia on March 3, 1986.

Keywords

Shock Wave Shock Tube Shock Wave Lithotripsy Ureteral Stone Renal Calculus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wilbert DM, Reichenberger H, Noske E, et al: New generation shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138: 563, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whelan JP and Finlayson B: Clinical application of blast path kinetics. Endourology 2: 13, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korbon GA, Hurley DP, Williams GS: pH adjusted lidocaine does not “sting.” Anesthesiology 66: 855 (letter), 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson KS: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. In Raj PP (ed): Practical Management of Pain. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sackmann M, Delius M, Sauerbruch T et al: Shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. NEJM 318: 393, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan D. Jenkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of Virginia School of MedicineCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations