Advertisement

The Risk of Persistent Bacteriuria after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Infection Stones: A Prospective Study

  • Eli K. Michaels
  • Jackson E. FowlerJr.
  • Michele Mariano

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) effectively pulverizes infected (struvite) renal calculi. However, after ESWL minute residual fragments which may harbor bacteria and cause persistent bacteriuria can remain in the renal collecting system for months. We investigated prospectively the incidence of persistent Proteus mirabilis bacteriuria after ESWL among 20 consecutive women with P. mirabilis urinary tract infections and struvite calculi. All patients received parenteral gentamicin for three to 13 (mean 4.9) days immediately before and after ESWL. Oral antimicrobials were then administered for 14 to 70 (mean 31) days. Fifteen patients maintained a sterile urine or experienced urinary reinfection by other organisms during five to 22 (mean 14) months of subsequent bacteriologic surveillance. Nine of these 15 patients had residual fragments at last follow-up. Five patients developed P. mirabilis bacteriuria after one to seven months of surveillance. Three of these five patients had residual fragments. The mean stone size, methods of and duration of renal drainage procedures, and duration of antimicrobial therapy were similar for the two patient groups. P. mirabilis was isolated from the cultures of only three of 16 retrievable stone fragments. In contrast to intact infected renal calculi, residual stone fragments after ESWL are often susceptible to sterilization with antimicrobials.

Infected renal calculi (struvite calculi) are caused by infection of the urine with bacteria that synthesize the enzyme urease.1,2,3,4 Ammonium is released by the breakdown of urea by urease; the urine becomes highly alkaline, and magnesium ammonium phosphate (struvite) and carbonate apatite crystallize.5 Incorporation of the infecting bacteria within the developing stone results in a focus of infection that is resistant to conventional antimicrobial therapy and is manifested clinically by repetitive urinary tract infections caused by the infecting organism (persistent bacteriuria).1,6,7,8 Removal of infection stones is recommended, usually to prevent renal damage due to obstruction and infection and to eradicate the source of persistent bacteriuria. Complete removal of the calculus is generally required for bacteriologic cure.2,3,4,7,9

ESWL is now accepted as the preferred treatment for most renal and upper ureteral calculi.10 Calculi composed of struvite and apatite are susceptible to pulverization. However, minute stone fragments usually remain in the renal collecting system for weeks to months. The possibility that this material may harbor the infecting bacterium and may perpetuate persistent bacteriuria has not been systematically investigated. We studied prospectively the incidence of persistent bacteriuria among 20 consecutive women with infection stones after treatment with ESWL and after a standardized regimen of antimicrobial therapy. Our experience with the first 15 patients in this series has been published previously in the Journal of Urology.

Keywords

Shock Wave Lithotripsy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Stone Fragment Residual Fragment Bacteriologic Cure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson RB and Stamey TA: Bacteriology of infected stones. Urology 2: 627, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sleight MW and Wickham JEA: Long-term follow-up: 100 cases of renal calculi. Brit J Urol 49: 601, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jennis F, Lavan JN, Neale FC, et al: Staghorn calculi of the kidney: clinical, bacteriological, and biochemical features. Brit J Urol 42: 511, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chute R and Suby HI: Prevalence and importance of urea-splitting bacterial infections of the urinary tract in the formation of calculi. J Urol 44: 590, 1940.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffith DP, Musher DM, Itin C: Urease: the primary cause of infection-induced urinary stones. Invest Urol 13: 346, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nemoy NJ and Stamey TA: Surgical, biological, and biochemical management of “infection stones.” JAMA 215: 1470, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rocha H and Santos LCS: Relapse of urinary tract infection in the presence of urinary tract calculi: the role of bacteria within the calculi. J Med Microbiol 2: 372, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowler JE: Bacteriology of branched renal calculi and accompanying urinary tract infection. J Urol 131: 213, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverman DE and Stamey TA: Management of infection stones: the Stanford experience. Medicine 62: 44, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riehle RA, Fair WR, Vaughn ED: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: one-year experience at a single center. JAMA 255: 2043, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fowler JE: Office bacteriology: techniques and interpretations. Seminars in Urology 1: 97, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bauer AW, Perry DM, Kirby WM: Single-disk antibiotic-sensitivity testing of staphylococci: an analysis of technique and results. Arch Inter Med 104: 208, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Griffith DP, Moskowitz PA, Carlton CE: Adjunctive chemotherapy of infection-induced staghorn calculi. J Urol 121: 711, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams JJ, Rodman JS, Peterson CM: A randomized double-blind study of acetohydroxamic acid in struvite nephrolithiasis. NEJM 311: 760, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Resnick MI and Boyce WH: Bilateral staghorn calculi: patient evaluation and management. J Urol 122: 338, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feit RM and Fair WR: The treatment of infection stones with penicillin. J Urol 122: 592, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rous SN and Turner WR: Retrospective study of 95 patients with staghorn calculus disease. J Urol 118: 902, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eli K. Michaels
    • 1
  • Jackson E. FowlerJr.
    • 1
  • Michele Mariano
    • 1
  1. 1.Kidney Stone Center of ChicagoUniversity of Illinois College of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations