Advertisement

Treatment of Ureteral Calculi by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in a Multi-Use Center

  • Christopher D. Fetner
  • Glenn M. Preminger
  • JoAnn Seger
  • Tony A. Lea

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy therapy in 138 patients who presented with mid and upper ureteral calculi. In the patients who had successful stone manipulation back into the renal collecting system, the success rate was significantly higher when compared to patients with stones treated primarily within the ureter (92.8% v 80.8%, p < 0.05). For the stones which were treated within the ureter, the success rate appeared similar for stones treated in situ (83.3%), compared to those cases where a catheter could be placed alongside the calculus (79.3%).

Higher voltage and more shock waves were administered to stones treated within the ureter as compared to stones which were manipulated back into the kidney prior to ESWL. However, this increased power did not enhance the success rate. In addition, it appears that a plain film of the abdomen obtained within 24 hours of lithotripsy treatment is a good predictor of success as defined by the stone-free rate at six-week follow-up.

Our results from a community-based multi-use lithotripsy center suggest that ureteral stone manipulation should be attempted prior to ESWL therapy for mid and upper ureteral calculi.

Keywords

Shock Wave Lithotripsy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Ureteral Stone Stone Removal Ureteral Calculus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kahn RI: Endourological treatment of ureteral calculi. J Urol 135: 239, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Schoenberg HW, et al: Transurethral removal of large ureteral and renal pelvic calculi using ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Urol 130: 31, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnold J and Lyon E: Ureteroscopic stone extraction: the University of Chicago experience and methods used to overcome common pitfalls. J Urol 135: 257A (abstract), 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dretler SP, Keating MA, Riley J: An algorithm for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 136: 1190, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lingeman JE, Sonda LP, Kahnoski RJ, et al: Ureteral stone management: emerging concepts. J Urol 135: 1172, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riehle RA and Naslund EB: Treatment of calculi in the upper ureter with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Surg Gyn and Obstet 164: 1, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mueller SC, Wilbert D, Thueroff JW et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings. J Urol 135: 831, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lingeman JE, Newman DM, Mertz JHO, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol 135: 689, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher D. Fetner
    • 1
  • Glenn M. Preminger
    • 2
  • JoAnn Seger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tony A. Lea
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dallas Regional Lithotripsy CenterMedical City DallasUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations