Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ESWL versus Ureteral Stent and ESWL for the Treatment of Large Renal Calculi and Staghorn Calculi: Preliminary Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study

  • K. Miller
  • R. Bachor
  • R. Hautmann

Abstract

Recently published data indicate that morbidity after ESWL of large renal calculi (> 2 cm) can be significantly diminished by inserting a ureteral double-J stent prior to treatment. A prospective, randomized study was designed to clarify if ESWL plus ureteral stenting is preferable to the combination of PNL/ESWL for the treatment of large renal calculi (> 2.5 cm) and staghorn stones. To date 74 patients have entered the study; preliminary data of 53 patients are available.

 

PNL/ESWL

Stent/ESWL

Number of patients

38.0

36.0

Age (mean, years)

54.0

49.0

ASA (mean)

2.0

1.7

Mortality

0

0

Hospital Stay (days)

19.4

17.6

Complications

24%

3%

Auxiliary Measures

16%

25%

Stone Free (at discharge)

41%

0%

Stone Free (follow-up)

66%

15%

Complications (bleeding, septicemia, deterioration of renal function) are significantly more frequent following PNL/ESWL, whereas the need for auxiliary measures (mainly percutaneous nephrostomies) is greater following stent/ESWL. Results after an average follow-up of three months indicate that only 15% of patients treated with ESWL and ureteral stenting were free of stones, suggesting that longer follow-up is necessary for the assessment of the definitive value of this treatment modality in the treatment of large renal calculi. With the availability of anesthesia-free ESWL in the Dornier HM3, this topic is currently of particular interest.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abomelha MS, Said MT, Otaibi KE, et al: ESWL monotherapy in staghorn calculi. V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alken P, Scharfe T, Rorig J, et al: Staghorn stones: surgery or ESWL and PNL? V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaussy CG, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, et al: First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127: 417, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drach GW, Dretler SP, Fair WR, et al: Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135: 1127, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eisenberger F, Rassweiler J, Bub P, et al: Differentiated approach to staghorn calculi using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: an analysis of 151 consecutive cases. World J Urol 5: 248, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuchs G, Miller K, Rassweiler J, et al: One-year experience with Dornier lithotripter. Eur Urol 11: 145, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graff J, Pastor J, Herberhold D, et al: Technical modifications of the Dornier HM3 lithotripter with an improved anesthesia technique. World J Urol 5: 202, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Groenveld AE: ESWL monotherapy in large stone burdens. V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Libby J, Meacham RB, Griffith DG: Role of silicone ureteral stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of large renal calculi. J Urol 139: 15, 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lingeman JE: Current concepts on the relative efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. World J Urol 5: 229, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller K, Bachor R, Hautmann R: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy/ESWL versus ureteral stent/ESWL for the treatment of large renal calculi and staghorn stones: a prospective randomized study. V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patterson DE, Segura JW, LeRoy AJ: Long-term follow-up of patients treated by percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for struvite staghorn calculi. J Endourol 1: 177, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snyder JA, Rosenblum JL, Smith AD: Endourological removal of staghorn calculi in the elderly: analysis of 42 cases. J Endourol 1: 123, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tiselius HG, Hellgren E, Wall I: Infectious staghorn stones treated with ESWL and hemiacidrin irrigation. J Endourol 2: 137, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zwergel U, Neisius D, Zwergel T, et al: Results and clinical management of extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL) in 1,321 consecutive treatments. World J Urol 5: 213, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Miller
    • 1
  • R. Bachor
    • 1
  • R. Hautmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of UrologyUniversity of UlmUlmWest Germany

Personalised recommendations