Advertisement

Enlisting Help in the Analysis of Practice

  • Phil P. Manning
  • Lois Debakey

Abstract

Most people find it threatening to have their work reviewed. For professionals, the threat may be real, since society often judges their shortcomings harshly and may devise regulatory, even punitive, solutions. A few physicians may, indeed, require regulatory sanctions, and all can benefit from reminders of their errors of omission and commission. Careful, constructive analysis of events in practice can motivate physicians to continue their education, whereas draconian penalties may drive some underground. The data on their practices then become unreliable, and their opportunity to profit from experience is lost. We distinguish clearly between formal external quality-assurance mechanisms and the improvement in medical practice that ensues from a well-motivated physician’s voluntary analysis of his practice.

Keywords

Family Practice External Auditor National Diabetes Data Group External Analysis Professional Liability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Latham, Peter Mere. General remarks on the practice of medicine. In: Martin, Robert, ed. The Collected Works of Dr. P. M. Latham. London: The New Sydenham Society, 1878: 465.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sivertson, Sigurd E.; Meyer, Thomas C.; Hansen, Richard; Schoenenberger, Adeline. Individual physician profile: Continuing education related to medical practice. J Med Educ Nov 1973; 48 (11): 1006–1012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowler, Francis L.; Brading, Paul L.; Burg, Frederic D.; Finestone, Albert J.; Hubbard, John P. A practice-related educational program. JAMA Mar 28 1977; 237 (13): 1346–1349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Board of Family Practice. Diabetes Mellitus. Reference Guide 9 of the Office Record Review Project, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gullion, David S.; Adamson, T. Elaine; Watts, Malcolm S. M. The effect of an individualized practice-based CME program on physician performance and patient outcomes. West J Med Apr 1983; 138 (4): 582–588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Craddick, Joyce W. The medical management analysis system: A professional liability warning mechanism. QRB Apr 1979; 5 (4): 2–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mills, Don Harper. Medical insurance feasibility study: A technical summary. West J Med Apr 1978; 128 (4): 360–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manning, Phil R.; Lee, Peter V.; Denson, Teri A.; Gilman, Nelson J. Determining educational needs in the physician’s office. JAMA Sep 5 1980; 244 (10): 1112–1115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phil P. Manning
    • 1
  • Lois Debakey
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  3. 3.New OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations