Advertisement

A Robust Indirect Adaptive Control Approach

  • Gerhard Kreisselmeier

Abstract

This paper considers the robust design of an indirect adaptive control approach, which is applicable when the unknown parameters of a linear, time invariant plant lie in a known convex set throughout which no unstable pole-zero cancellation occurs. In order to achieve the robustness, the use of a relative dead zone in the adaptive law is proposed. It is shown that, with a suitably designed relative dead zone, the adaptive control system is (globally) stable, even in the presence of small, unmodeled plant uncertainties.

Keywords

Adaptive Control Adaptive System Robust Stability Dead Zone Adaptive Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C.E. Rohrs, L. Valavani, M. Athans and G. Stein, “Robustness of Adaptive Control Algorithms in the Presence of Unmodeled Dynamics,” Proc. 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, Florida, 1982, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    P.A. Ioannou and P.V. Kokotovic, “Adaptive Systems with Reduced Models,” in Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 47, Springer, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Kreisselmeier, “On Adaptive State Regulation,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., vol. AC-27, pp. 3–7, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    B.D.O. Anderson and R.M. Johnstone, “Robust Lyapunov Stability Results and Adaptive Systems,” Proc. 20th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, Ca., 1981, pp. 510–515.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B.D.O. Anderson, “Exponential Convergence and Persistent Excitation,” Proc. 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, Florida, 1982, pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    K.S. Narendra and A.M. Annaswamy, “Persistent Excitation and Robust Adaptive Algorithms,” Proc. 3rd Workshop on Applications of Adaptive Systems Theory, Yale University, 1983, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    B.B. Peterson and K.S. Narendra, “Bounded Error Adaptive Control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., vol. AC-27, pp. 1161–1168, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    B.D.O. Anderson, “Adaptive Identification of Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output Plants,” Proc. 13th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1974, pp. 273–281.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Kreisselmeier, “A Robust Indirect Adaptive Control Approach,” DFVLR-Institut fuer Dynamik der Flugsysteme, 1983, also Int. J. Contr.,to appear 1985/86.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. Kreisselmeier and B.D.O. Anderson, “Robust Model Reference Adaptive Control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr.,to appear, 1985/86.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C.A. Desoer and M. Vidyasagar, Feedback Systems: Input-Output Properties, Academic Press, New York, 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R.L. Kosut and B. Friedlander, “Performance Robustness Properties of Adaptive Control Systems,” Proc. 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, Florida, 1982, pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R.L. Kosut, C.R. Johnson and B.D.O. Anderson, “Robustness of Reduced-Order Adaptive Model Following,” Proc. 3rd Workshop on Applications of Adaptive Systems Theory, Yale University, 1983, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    G. Kreisselmeier and K.S. Narendra, “Stable Model Reference Adaptive Control in the Presence of Bounded Disturbances,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., vol. AC-27, pp. 1169–1175, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    L.A. Zadeh and C.A. Desoer, Linear System Theory, McGraw Hill, New York, 1963.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Kreisselmeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of KasselKasselWest Germany

Personalised recommendations