Advertisement

Identification of Receptors Using Direct Radioligand Binding Techniques

  • Lee E. Limbird

Abstract

The availability of radioactively labeled hormones and drugs that retain their biological activity has allowed the direct identification of binding sites for these radiolabeled agents in target tissues where they elicit a physiological effect. This chapter will describe methods for the identification of radioligand binding sites and for obtaining data to establish whether or not the observed binding sites represent the physiological “receptor” for a particular hormone, neurotransmitter, or drug.

Keywords

Radioligand Binding Equilibrium Dialysis Scatchard Plot Competition Binding Positive Cooperativity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

General

  1. Cheng, Y. and Prusoff, W.H. (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of an inhibitor that causes a 50% inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 22:3099–3108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cornish-Bowden, A. and Koshland, D.E. (1975) Diagnostic uses of the Hill (Logit and Nernst) plots. J. Mol. Biol. 95:201–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Janin, J. (1973) The study of allosteric proteins. In Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, J.A.V. Butler and D. Noble (eds.). New York: Pergamon Press, p. 77–119.Google Scholar
  4. Klotz, I.M. and Hunston, D.L. (1971) Properties of graphical representations of multiple classes of sites. Biochem. 10:3065–3069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koshland, D.E. (1970) The molecular basis for enzyme regulation. In The Enzymes, P.D. Boyer (ed.), ch. 7, Academic Press, New York, pp. 341–396.Google Scholar
  6. Scatchard, G. (1949) The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 51:660–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Whitehead, E. (1970) The regulation of enzyme activity and allosteric transition. Prog. Bioph. Mol. Biol. 21:321–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wieland, G. A. and Molinoff, P.B. (1981) Quantitative analysis of drug-receptor interactions. I. Determination of kinetic and equilibrium properties. Life Sci. 29:313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wyman, J. (1948) Heme proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 4:407–531 (especially pp. 436–443 for derivation of the Hill equation).Google Scholar

Specific

  1. Aranyi, P. (1980) Kinetics of the hormone-receptor interaction. Competition experiments with slowly equilibrating ligands. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 628:220–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bearer, CF., Knapp, R.D., Kaumann, A.J., Swartz, T.L. and Birnbaumer, L. (1980) Iodo-hydroxybenzylpindolol: Preparation, purification, localization of its iodine to the indole ring, and characterization as a partial agonist. Mol. Pharmacol. 17:328–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boeynaems, J.M. and Dumont, J.E. (1975) Quantitative analysis of the binding of ligands to their receptors. J. Cyclic Nucl. Res. 1:123–142.Google Scholar
  4. Burgisser, E., Hancock, A.A., Lefkowitz, R.J. and DeLean, A. (1981) Anomalous equilibrium binding properties of high-affinity racemic radioligands. Mol. Pharmacol. 19:205–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgisser, E., Lefkowitz, R.J. and Delean, A. (1981) Alternative explanation for the apparent “two step” binding kinetics of high-affinity racemic antagonist radioligands. Mol. Pharmacol. 19:509–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, K-J., Jacobs, S. and Cuatrecasas, P. (1975) Quantitative aspects of hormone-receptor interactions of high affinity. Effect of receptor concentration and measurement of dissociation constants of labeled and unlabeled hormones. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 406:294–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colowick, S.P. and Womack, F.C. (1960) Binding of diffusible molecules by macromolecules: Rapid measurement by rate of dialysis. J. Biol. Chem. 244:774–777.Google Scholar
  8. DeLean, A. and Rodbard, D. (1979) Kinetics of cooperative binding. In Receptors: A Comprehensive Treatise, R.D. O’Brien (ed.), pp. 1443–1490. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  9. DeMeyts, P., Bianco, A. and Roth, J. (1976) Site-site interactions among insulin receptors. Characterization of the negative cooperativity. J. Biol. Chem. 251:1877–1888.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehlert, F.J., Roeske, W.R. and Yamamura, H.I. (1981) Mathematical analysis of the kinetics of competitive inhibition in neurotransmitter receptor binding assays. Mol. Pharmacol. 19:367–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill, A.V. (1910) The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J. Physiol. 40:iv–vii.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, A.V. (1913) The combinations of haemoglobin with oxygen and with carbon monoxide. I. Biochem.J. 7:471–480.Google Scholar
  13. Hollenberg, M.D. and Cuatrecasas, P. (1979) Distinction of receptor from non-receptor interaction in binding studies. In The Receptors: A Comprehensive Treatise, R.D. O’Brien (ed.), New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  14. Insel, P.A., Mahan, L.C., Motulsky, H.J., Stoolman, L.M. and Koachman, A.M. (1983) Time-dependent decreases in binding affinity of agonists for β-adrenergic receptors of intact S49 Lymphoma cells. A mechanism of desensitization. J. Biol. Chem. 258:13597–13605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobs, S., Chang, K.-H. and Cuatrecasas, P. (1975) Estimation of hormone receptor affinity by competitive displacement of labeled ligand: Effect of concentration of receptor and of labeled ligand. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 66:687–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klotz, I.M. (1982) Numbers of receptor sites from Scatchard graphs: Facts and fantasies. Science 217:1247–1249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koshland, D.E., Nemethy, G. and Filmer, D. (1966) Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochem. 5:365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langmuir, I.J. (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 40:1361–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linden, J. (1982) Calculating the dissociation constant of an unlabeled compound from the concentration required to displace radiolabel binding by 50%. J. Cycl. Nucl. Res. 8:163–172.Google Scholar
  20. Motulsky, H.J. and Mahan, L.C. (1984) The kinetics of competitive radioligand binding predicted by the law of mass action. Mol. Pharmacol. 25:1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Monod, J., Wyman, J. and Changeaux, J.-P. (1965) On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12:88–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Munson, P.J. (1983) Experimental artifacts and the analysis of ligand binding data: Results of the computer simulation. J. Receptor Research 3:249–259.Google Scholar
  23. Munson, P.J. and Rodbard, D. (1983) Number of receptor sites from Scatchard and Klotz graphs: A constructive critique. Science 220:979–981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pittman, R.N. and Molinoff, P.B. (1980) Interactions of agonists and antagonists with β-adrenergic receptors on intact L6 muscle cells. J. Cyclic Nucl. Res. 6:421–435.Google Scholar
  25. Rodbard, D. (1973) Mathematics of hormone-receptor interaction. I. Basic principles. Adv. Expt. Med. and Biol. 36:289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodbard, D. and Frazier, G.R. (1975) Statistical analysis of radioligand assay data. Methods in Enzymol. 37:1–22.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenthal, H.E. (1967) A graphic method for the determination and presentation of binding parameters in complex systems. Anal. Biochem. 20:525–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siiteri, P.K. (1984) Receptor binding studies (re: problems in the estimation of free ligand concentrations). Science 223: 191 – 193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taylor, S.I. (1975) Binding of hormones to receptors. An alternative explanation of nonlinear Scatchard plots. Biochem. 14:2357–2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wyman, J. (1967) Allosteric linkage. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 89:2202–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee E. Limbird
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations