Skip to main content

Abstract

Much of the conceptual framework regarding how to study receptor function evolved from pharmacological investigation of drug action. Consequently, the historical account of the development of receptor theory in this chapter, as well as the outline of how to characterize receptors in intact tissues that follows in chapter 2, will emphasize early investigations of drug action rather than, for example, physiological studies of hormone action. However, the reader must keep in mind that “drug” can be defined as any agent that affects living processes. Drugs presumably bind to receptors designed for interaction with endogenous hormones and neurotransmitters. By way of definition, agonist drugs are analogous to endogenous hormones and neurotransmitters, in the sense that they elicit a biological effect, although the effect elicited may be stimulatory or inhibitory. In contrast, antagonist drugs are defined as agents that block receptor-mediated effects elicited by hormones, neurotransmitters, or agonist drugs by competing for receptor occupancy. Antagonists do not appear to have an endogenous counterpart in the strict sense of a competitive inhibitor of receptor occupancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, A. (1979) Chemotherapy: history and principles. In Selective Toxicity (6th ed.), Chapman and Hall (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 182–199. (This section of chapter 6 summarized P. Erhlich’s fundamental contributions to chemotherapy and general “receptor” principles.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariëns, E.J. (1954) Affinity and intrinsic activity in the theory of competitive inhibition. Part I. Problems and theory. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn 99:32–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ariëns, E.J. (1960) Receptor reserve and threshold phenomena I. Theory and experiments with autonomic drugs tested on isolated organs. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn 127:459–478.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ariëns, E.J. and de Groot, W.M. (1954) Affinity and intrinsic-activity in the theory of competitive inhibition. III. Homologous decamethonium-derivatives and succinyl-choline-esters. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn 99:193–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barger, G. and Dale, H.H. (1910) Chemical structure and sympathomimetic action of amines. J. Physiol. 41:19–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C. (1856) Physiological analysis of the properties of the muscular and nervous system by means of curare. Comptes Rendus Acad. de Sci. 43:825–829. Translated and reprinted in Readings in Pharmacology, L. Shuster (ed.), Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp. 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J.W. and Leff, P. (1983) Operational models of pharmacological agonism. Proc. Royal Soc. London B. 220:141–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Changeux, J.-P. and Podleski, T.R. (1968) On the excitability and cooperativity of the electroplax membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 59:944–950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. (1926) The reaction between acetyl choline and muscle cells. J. Physiol. 61:530–546.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. (1926) The antagonism of acetyl choline by atropine. J. Physiol. 61:547–556.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. (1927) The reaction between acetyl choline and muscle cells. Part II. J. Physiol. 64:123–143.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. (1937) General Pharmacology, pp. 61–98, 176–206 and 215–217. Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. and Raventos, J. (1937) The antagonism of acetylcholine and of quarternary ammonium salts. Quant. J. Exp. Physiol. 26:375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, D. (1973) The relation between classical and cooperative models for drug action. In Drug Receptors, H.P. Rang (ed.), University Park, Baltimore, pp. 149–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, H.H. (1914) The action of certain esters and ethers of choline, and their relation to muscarine. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 6:174–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhlich, P. (1913) Chemotherapeutics: scientific principles, methods and results. Lancet 2:445–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furchgott, R.F. (1955) The pharmacology of vascular smooth muscle. Pharmacol. Rev. 7:183–235.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furchgott, R.F. (1964) Receptor mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Pharmacology 4:21–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furchgott, R.F. and Bhadrakom, S. (1953) Reactions of strips of rabbit aorta to epinephrine, isoproterenol, sodium nitrite and other drugs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 108:129–143.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddum, J.H. (1926) The action of adrenalin and ergotamine on the uterus of the rabbit. J. Physiol. 61:141–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddum, J.H. (1937) The quantitative effects of antagonistic drugs. J. Physiology 89:7P–9P.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddum, J.H. (1957) Theories of drug antagonism. Pharm. Rev. 9:211–217.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A., Aronow, L. and Kaiman, S.M. (1974) Principles of Drug Action: The Basis of Pharmacology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 82–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, A. (1967) On the application of a “plausible model” of allosteric proteins to the receptor of acetylcholine. J. Theoret. Biol. 16:306–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, J.N. (1878) On the physiology of the salivary secretion. Part II. On the mutual antagonism of atropin and pilocarpin, having especial reference to their relations in the submaxillary gland of the cat. J. Physiol 1:339–369.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, J.N. (1909) On the contraction of muscle, chiefly in relation to the presence of “receptive” substances. Part IV. The effect of curare and of some other substances on the nicotine response of the sartorious and gastrocnemius muscles of the frog. J. Physiol 39:235–295.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J., Wyman, J. and Changeux, J.-P. (1965) On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12:88–118.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, M. (1956) Receptor occupancy and tissue response. Nature 78:697–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, W.D.M. (1961) A theory of drug action based on the rate of drug-receptor combination. Proc Royal Soc. B. 154:21–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, R.P. (1956) A modification of receptor theory. Br. J. Pharmacology 11:379–393.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thron, CD. (1973) On the analysis of pharmacological experiments in terms of an allosteric receptor model. Mol. Pharmacol. 9:1–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thron, CD. and Waud, D.R. (1968) The rate of action of atropine. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 160:91–105.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum, J.M. and Ariëns, E.J. (1962) Receptor reserve and threshold phenomena II. Theories on drug-action and a quantitative approach to spare receptors and threshold values. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn 136:385–413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Limbird, L.E. (1986). Historical Perspective. In: Cell Surface Receptors: A Short Course on Theory and Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1882-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1882-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1884-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1882-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics