Abstract
Erikson’s Young Man Luther opened a whole new phase in psychohistory. It became a highly controversial and visible endeavor for the literate public: one New Yorker cartoon in the mid-1970s pictured the locked door of a psychiatric unit with the label “Psychohistorian” above a small window. Among professional historians, profound skepticism developed along with ambivalent curiosity. No convention program after about 1970 was worth its salt without one or more avowedly psychohistorical sessions. The leading historical journals began publishing articles that made clear their dependence on psychoanalytic theory. Interest in psychohistory among psychiatrists and psychoanalysts was less dramatic or intense and also less ambivalent. Psychoanalytic applications to history had had a longer established and more secure place; such applications now simply increased. In 1962, Bruce Mazlish published the first collection of psychohistorical essays, an approach to publishing in the field that has since become quite popular.1 Periodic reviews of the literature and assessments of the “state of the art” became de rigeur for anyone who claimed to be “in” psychohistory.2 Nearly everyone had studied the field to as far back as 1958, when Erikson published Young Man Luther and William Langer summoned historians to their “next assignment.” Some, however, especially psychoanalysts such as Heinz Kohut and Robert Lifton, took a broader perspective, and gradually historians, too, began to place psychohistory in a longer time frame.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Bruce Mazlish, Psychoanalysis and History. The other important collections of essays published during the last two decades include: Explorations in Psychohistory: The Well-fleet Papers, ed. Robert Jay Lifton (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1974); Varieties of Psychohistory, ed. George M. Kren and Leon H. Rappaport (New York: Springer, 1976); Psychoanalytic Interpretation of History, ed. Benjamin Wolman (New York: Basic Books, 1971); and four collections edited by Lloyd DeMause (all of dubious value): The History of Childhood (New York: The Psychohistory Press, 1974); The New Psychohistory (New York: The Psychohistory Press, 1975); (with Henry Ebel), Jimmy Carter and American Fantasy: Psychohistorical Exploration (New York: Psychohistory Press, 1977); and Foundations of Psychohistory (New York: Creative Roots, 1982). The promises and problems of collections without a theme are illustrated in New Directions in Psychohistory: The Adelphi Papers in Honor of Erik H. Erikman, ed. Mel Albin (Lexington: Lexington Books, 1980); and
Robert J. Brugger, Our Selves, Our Past: Psychological Approaches to American History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981). Various journals, especially The Psychohistory Review, regularly publish collections of essays on a special topic, and less specialized journals, such as the American Historical Review or the Journal of Interdisciplinary History, occasionally devote whole issues to psychohistory.
It is only possible to mention here a few representative titles, arranged in chronological order. The best of the lot, an essay seldom read by historians but frequently cited and discussed by psychoanalysts, is Heinz Kohut, “Beyond the Bounds” (1960). Other essays include: Heinz Hartmann, “The Application of Psychoanalytic Concepts to Social Science,” Essays on Ego Psychology (New York: International Universities Press, 1964), 90–98
Erik H. Erikson, “Psychoanalysis and Ongoing History,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 22 (1965), 241–250
Richard Bushman, “On the Use of Psychohistory: Conflict and Conciliation in Benjamin Franklin,” History and Theory, 5 (1966), 225–240
John Klauber, “On the Dual Use of Historical and Scientific Method in Psychoanalysis,” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49 (1968), 80–88
Erik Erikson, “Autobiographic Notes on the Identity Crisis,” Daedulus, 99 (1970), 730–759
John E. Mack, “Psychoanalysis and Historical Biography,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 19 (1971), 143–179
Bruce Mazlish, “Autobiography and Psychoanalysis: Between truth and Self-Deception,” Encounter, 35 (1970), 28–37; “What is Psychohistory?” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Fifth Series 21 (1971), 79-99; review essay of Mitzmon’s The Iron Cage, History and Theory, 10 (1970), 90-107
Hans-Ulrich Wehler, Geschichte und Psychoanalyse, (Köln: Kiepenfeur und Witsch, 1971)
Arnold Toynbee, “Aspects of Psychohistory,” Main Currents, 29 (1972), 44–46
George Rosen, “Psyche and History,” Psychological Medicine, 2 (1972), 205–207
Robert Detmeilar, “Retreat From Environmentalism: A Review of the Psychohistory of George III,” History Teacher, 6 (1972), 37–46
Fritz Schmidt, “Problems of Method in Applied Psychoanalysis,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 41 (1972), 402–419
Philip Pomper, “Problems of a Naturalistic Psychohistory,” History and Theory, 12 (1973), 367–88
Arthur Mitzman, “Social Engagement and Psycho-History,” Tydschrift voor Geschiedenis, 87 (1974), 425–442
Perry Lewis, “Psychology and the Abolitionists: Reflections on Martin Duberman and the Neo-Abolitionist of the 1960s,” Reviews in American History, 2 (1974), 309–321
Peter Loewenberg, “Psychohistorical Perspectives in Modern German History,” Journal of Modern History, 47 (1975), 229–279
Fred Weinstein and Gerald Platt, “The Coming Crisis in Psychohistory,” Journal of Modern History, 47 (1975), 202–228
Bruce Mazlish, “On Teaching History,” AHA Newsletter, 14 (1976), 5–8
William M. Banks, “Psychohistory and the Black Psychologist,” Journal of Black Psychology, 2 (1976), 25–31
Robert Pois, “Historicism, Marxism, and Psychohistory: Three Approaches to the Problem of Historical Individuality,” Social Science Journal, 13 (1976), 77–91
Gerald M. Platt, “The Sociological Endeavor and Psychoanalytic Thought,” American Quarterly, 28 (1976), 343–359
Fred Weinstein, “Benjamin Nelson’s Contribution to Psychosocial Perspectives,” Psychohistory Review, 5 (1976), 4–10
Bruce Mazlish, “Psychohistory and Politics,” Center Magazine, 10 (1977), 5–14
Joseph I. Shulin, “Robespierre and the French Revolution: A Review Article,” American History Review, 82 (1977), 20–38
George M. Kren, “Psychohistorical Interpretation of National Socialism,” German Studies Review, 1 (1978), 150–172
Donald J. Winslow, “Current Bibliography on Life-Writing,” Biography, 1 (1978), 76–81
Paul W. Guyser, “Psychoanalytic Method in the Study of Religious Meanings,” Psychohistory Review, 6 (1978), 45–50
Terry H. Anderson, “Becoming Sane With Psychohistory,” Historians, 41 (1978), 1–20
Stephen D. Rockwood and Geoffrey Cocks, “The Use and Abuse of Psychohistory,” Journal of Psychohistory, 5 (1977), 131–138; Patrick G. Russell, “Psychohistory: An Object Relations Approach” (Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1980); and
Bruce Mazlish, “The Next ‘Next Assignment’: Leader and Led, Individual and Group,” Psychohistory Review, 9 (1981), 137–214.
Robert Jay Lifton, Death In Life: Survivors of Hiroshima (New York: Vintage Books, 1967); Revolutionary Immortality: Mao Tse-tung and the Chinese Cultural Revolution (New York: Vintage Books, 1968); Home From the War: Vietnam Veterans, Neither Victims Nor Executioners (New York: Simon & Shuster, 1973). Note also The Broken Connection: On Death and the Continuity of Life (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979; paperback, Basic Books, 1983).
Peter Loewenberg, “The Psychohistorical Origins of the Nazi Youth Cohort,” American Historical Review, 76 (1971), 1457–1502
Rudolph Binion, Hitler Among The Germans, (New York: Elsevier, 1976)
Kai Erikson, Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance (New York: Wiley, 1960)
Charles B. Strozier, Lincoln’s Quest For Union: Public and Private Meanings (New York: Basic Books, 1982)
Peter Gay, The Bourgeois Experience, Vol. I of Education of the Senses (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984).
John P. Demos, A Little Commonwealth: Family Life in Plymouth Colony (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970); and Entertaining Satan: Witchcraft and the Culture of Early New England (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982).
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg, “The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations Between Women in Nineteenth-Century America,” Signs, 1 (1975), 1–29.
Special Issue, Psychohistory Review (1979); Lloyd DeMause, The New Psychohistory, p. 4; Patrick Hutton, “The Psychohistory of Erik Erikson From the Perspective of Collective Mentalities,” Psychohistory Review, 12 (1983), 18–25.
The publisher, Oxford University Press, shared the galleys of the book with Charles Strozier before publication.
Stannard, Shrinking History, p. 147.
Note, for example, ibid., the discussion of Erikson, pp. 22-24 and of John Demos, pp. 119-121.
Note the discussion forum of Stannard’s book organized by Charles Strozier, Psychohistory Review, 9 (1980), 136–161.
John Leonard, book review of Shrinking History, The New York Times, 26 May, 1980, Book review section.
David E. Stannard, The Puritan Way of Death: A Study in Religion, Culture, and Social Change (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980).
Ibid., 33.
Ibid., 60.
Ibid., 138.
Ibid., 138.
Gary Wills, Chicago Sun Times, 20 Jan. 1978.
Erikson, Young Man Luther, p. 110.
James Thomas Flexner, George Washington, 4 volumes, Vol. I: The Forge of Experience (Boston: Little, Brown, 1965), p. 31, for example.
Don E. Fehrenbacher, “Lincoln and the Weight of Responsibility,” Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society, 68 (1975), p. 53 and p. 58.
Robert G. L. Waite, The Psychopathic God: Adolf Hitler (New York: Basic Books, 1977), p. xiii.
DeMause, The New Psychohistory, p. 4.
Fred Weinstein and Gerald Platt, Psychoanalytic Sociology, p. 1, note 1.
DeMause, The New Psychohistory, p. 23.
DeMause and Beisel, Jimmy Carter, p. 63.
Ibid., 26.
Ibid., 9.
Two excellent reviews of the literature have appeared in the last decade: Hans Gatzke, “Hitler and Psychohistory: A Review Article,” American Historical Review, 78 (1973), 394–401; and Peter Loewenberg, “Psychohistorical Perspectives...” Note also
Saul Friedländer, History and Psychoanalysis (New York: Holmes and Meir, 1978).
Hoffman, “Psychoanalytic Interpretations...”
Walter C. Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler: The Secret Wartime Report (New York: New American Library, 1973).
Henry V. Dicks, “Personality Traits and National Socialist Ideology: A Wartime Study of German Prisoners of War,” Human Relations (1950), 111-154 (this became, later, Licensed Mass Murder: A Socio-psychological Study of Some SS Killers, (New York, 1972); Eugene Lerner, “Pathological Nazi Stereotypes Found in Recent German Technical Journals,” Journal of Psychology, 13 (1942), 187–92; Bertram Schaffner, Father Land: A Study of Authoritarianism in the German Family, (New York, 1948)
Paul Keczkemeti and Nathan Leites, “Some Psychological Hypotheses on Nazi Germany,” Journal of Social Psychology, 26, part 2 (November, 1947), 141–83; 27, part 1 (February 1948), 91-117; 27, part 2 (May, 1948), 241-70; 28, part 1 (August, 1948), 141-64; David C. McClelland, The Roots of Consciousness (New York, 1964).
James H. McRandle, The Tracks of the Wolf (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1965)
Alexander Mitscherlich, Society Without The Father: A Contribution to Social Psychology, trans. Eric Mosbacker (New York: Schocken Books, 1970)
Peter Loewenberg, “The Psychohistorical Origins...,” and “The Unsuccessful Adolescence of Heinrich Himmler,” American Historical Review, 76 (1971), 612–641; Rudolph Binion, Hitler Among the Germans; Robert G. L. Waite, The Psychopathic God
Saul Friedländer, L’Antisémitisme Nazi: Histoire d’une psychose collective (Paris: Le Senil, 1971).
For example, Robert C. Tucker, Stalin as Revolutionary, 1829–1929, (New York: Norton, 1973); and
Bruce Mazlish, James and John Stuart Mill: Father and Son in The Nineteenth Century (London: Hutchinson, 1975). The best bibliographic listing of psychohistorical material in European history is Friedländer, History and Psychoanalysis.
See, for example, Gordon Fellman, “Leaf in a Storm: Jayaprakash Narayan as Politician and as Saint,” Psychohistory Review, 9 (1981), 183–213; and the essay by Muslin and Desai in this volume.
Brugger, ed. Our Selves, Our Past; Albin, ed., New Directions. Note two special issues of The Psychohistory Review: “American Culture,” 10 (1982) and “Psychological Studies of the James Family,” 8 (1979).
Strozier, Lincoln’s Quest for Union; Erikson, Dimensions.
Robert Jay Lifton, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of ‘Brainwashing’ in China, (New York: Norton, 1971); History and Human Survival (New York: Random House, 1970); Death in Life; and Home From the War.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strozier, C.B., Offer, D. (1985). The Growth of Psychohistory. In: Strozier, C.B., Offer, D. (eds) The Leader. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1838-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1838-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1840-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1838-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive