Advertisement

Cardiology pp 671-676 | Cite as

Long-Term Results of Coronary Rehabilitation: Rationale, Implementation and Significance of Programs

  • Nanette K. Wenger

Abstract

Rehabilitative programs are based on the concept that many patients with symptomatic coronary disease can and should return to a productive and active life. In the United States, particularly during the past decade, this rehabilitative approach has been progressively incorporated into traditional medical care. Because rehabilitation should begin at the onset of the acute illness and continue during the long-term care of the patient, the primary physician has a pivotal role in initiating and coordinating rehabilitative efforts.

Keywords

Exercise Training Early Ambulation Coronary Collateral Circulation Rehabilitative Approach Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. K. Wenger, H. K. Hellerstein, H. W. Blackburn and S. J. Castranova. Physician practice in the management of patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction — changes in the past decade. Circulation 65:421 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Report of the Task Force on Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, National Heart and Lung Institute: Needs and opportunities for rehabilitating the coronary heart disease patient, December 15, 1974, Washington DC, Department of Health, Education and Welfare Publication (NIH) 75–750.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. K. Wenger and H. K. Hellerstein (eds). “Rehabilitation of the Coronary Patient”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Saltin, G. Blomqvist, J. H. Mitchell, R. L. Johnson, K. Wildenthal and C. B. Chapman. Response to exercise after bed rest and after training. Circulation 37–38 (Suppl. 7):1 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    “The Exercise Standards Book”, American Heart Association, 70–041-A, Dallas, Texas (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. W. Shaw. Effects of a prescribed supervised exercise program on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients after a myocardial infarction. The National Exercise and Heart Disease Project. Am. J. Cardiol. 48:39 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Subcommittee on Exercise/Rehabilitation: Standards for supervised cardiovascular exercise maintenace programs. Circulation 62: 669A (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. M. R. Detry, M. Rousseau and L. A. Brasseur. Early Hemodynamic adaptations to physical training in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Eur. J. Cardiol. 2/3:307 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Wilhelmsen, H. Sanne, D. Elmfeldt, G. Grimby, G. Tibbins and H. Wedel. A controlled trial of physical training after myocardial infarction: Effects on risk factors, nonfatal reinfarction, and death. Prev. Med. 4:491 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. Kallio, H. Hamalainen, J. Hakkila and O. Luurila. Reduction in sudden deaths by a multifactoral intervention program after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2:1091 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. A. Kushnir, K. M. Fox, I. W. Tomlinson and C. P. Aber. The effect of a pre-discharge consultation on the resumption of work, sexual activity, and driving following acute myocardial infarction. Scand. J. Rehab. Med. 8:155 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. K. Wenger: Rehabilitation of the patient with symptomatic coronary disease, in: “The Heart”, J. W. Hurst, ed., 5th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 1149 (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nanette K. Wenger
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Cardiac ClinicsGrady Memorial HospitalAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations