Skip to main content

Robust Risk Analysis: The Need for it in Nuclear Probabilistic Risk Evaluations

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 2))

Abstract

Probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) of nuclear reactor risks has grown considerably since the first major application was performed in 1975. However, PRA today remains an art and is by no means a codified science. The deficiencies and uncertainties in PRA need to be recognized in order for the results and analyses to be meaningfully utilized in decision making. Specific approaches and techniques can be devised to extract the robust conclusions from a PRA which are not sensitive to uncertainties and questionable assumptions. The specific tasks which are identified will strengthen the PRA field if they are carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, WASH-1400, NUREG-75/014 (October, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plants: A Discussion NUREG-0880 (February, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, PRA Procedures Guide Volumes 1 and 2, Revision 1, NUREG/CR-2300 (April, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. G. Waddington and A. Wild, The Fault Tree as a Tool in Safety Analysis in Nuclear Power Plants; Atomic Energy Control Board Report INFO-0036 (June 10, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. A. Kukielka, J. W. Minarick, and R. L. Scott, Potential Precursors to Severe Core Damage: Status Summary Report, Oak Ridge Project Report (January, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. F. DeFrancesco, Quantitative Analysis Methods for Substantive Analysis, Wiley (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. O. Berger, Statistical Decision Theory, Springer-Verlag (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. L. Fleming and P. H. Raabe, A Comparison of Three Methods for the Quantitative Analysis of Common Cause Failures, GA-A14568 (May, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. D. Swain and H. E. Guttmann, Handbook of Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, NUREG/ CR-1278 (October, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vesely, W.E. (1984). Robust Risk Analysis: The Need for it in Nuclear Probabilistic Risk Evaluations. In: Waller, R.A., Covello, V.T. (eds) Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk Analysis. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1820-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1818-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics