# Interpolation of Multidimensional Potential Surfaces by Polynomial Roots

## Abstract

Quantum mechanical calculations produce potential energy surfaces in the form of values of the energy E(q) at many geometries. The components of the vector q = q(q_{1}, q_{2},...q_{d}) are parameters which define the molecular geometry, and d is the total number of internal degrees of freedom defining the nuclear configuration space. This pointwise representation of the surface is rarely of much use either in visualization of the surface or in calculations of the reaction dynamics. A continuous representation can be derived from the given points by fitting a function to them. While the form of the function is at the disposal of the researcher, the effort required to obtain a given accuracy of fit can depend strongly on the functional form chosen. Several classes of functions have been used in interpolations, *e.g.*, cubic splines,^{1} polynomials,^{2} Padé approximants,^{3} and *ad hoc* functions suggested by the physics of the problem.^{4,5} None of these, except perhaps the last, are particularly suited to the representation of potential surfaces in that these surfaces are not of the same form as the fitting function. For example, polynomials are not bounded as their arguments go to plus or minus infinity, have a fixed number of extrema and inflection points, and cannot be multi-valued as can potential surfaces if more than one state of the molecule in question is considered.

## Keywords

Potential Energy Surface Potential Surface Quantum Mechanical Calculation Input Point Contour Diagram## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.H. J. Ahlberg, E. N. Wilson, and J. L. Walsh, “The Theory of Splines and Their Applications”, Academic, New York (1967).Google Scholar
- 2.C. L. Lawson and R. J. Hanson, “Solving Least Squares Problems”, Prentice-Hall, Inglewood Place, NJ (1974).Google Scholar
- 3.C. L. Lawson and R. J. Hanson, “The Padé Approximant in Theoretical Physics”, G. A. Baker, Jr. and J. L. Gammel, eds., Academic, New York (1970).Google Scholar
- G. A. Baker, Jr., “Essentials of Padé Approximants”, Academic, New York (1975).Google Scholar
- 4.D. G. Truhlar and C. J. Horowitz, Functional representation of Liu and Siegbahn’s accurate
*Ab initio*energy calculations for H + H_{2}, J. Chem. Phys. 68: 2466 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - D. G. Truhlar and C. J. Horowitz, Functional representation of Liu and Siegbahn’s accurate
*Ab initio*energy calculations for H + H_{2}, J. Chem. Phys. 71: 1514(E) (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.K. S. Sorbie and J. N. Murrell, Analytical potentials for tri-atomic molecules from spectroscopic data, Mol. Phys. 29: 1387 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- J. N. Murrell, K. S. Sorbie, and A. J. C. Varandas, Analytical potentials for triatomic molecules from spectroscopic data. II. Application to ozone, Mol. Phys. 32: 1359 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.J. W. Downing, J. Michl, J. Clzek, and J. Paldus, Multidimensional interpolation by polynomial roots, Chem. Phys. Lett. 67: 377 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.J. Čížek and J. Paldus, A direct calculation of the excitation energies of closed-shell systems using the Green function technique, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 6: 435 (1972); discussion of the status of large-molecule quantum chemistry, in: “Energy, Structure, and Reactivity”, D. W. Smith and W. B. McRae, eds., Wiley, New York (1973), p. 389.Google Scholar
- 8.J. A. Pople and D. L. Beveridge, “Approximate Molecular Orbital Theory”, McGraw-Hill, New York (1970).Google Scholar
- 9.U. Wahlgren, J. Pacansky, and P. S. Bagus,
*Ab initio*force constants for the HCN molecule: SCF and CI results, J. Chem. Phys. 63: 2874 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.W. H. Breckenridge, unpublished results.Google Scholar
- 11.J. P. Simons, unpublished results.Google Scholar
- 12.B. Liu and P. Siegbahn, An accurate three-dimsnional potential energy surface for H
_{3}, J. Chem. Phys. 68: 2457 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar