The Social Implementation of Cognitive Theory



Krech, Tolman, and Brunswik form the core of what future historians of psychology will call “the Berkeley Group.” These psychologists will be praised, as they have been praised, not only for their academic contributions but also for their efforts to relate their scientific work to the world outside the laboratory. All three tried to implement their ideas, although each sought implementation in a different way.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adelman, L., Stewart, TR., and Hammond, KR1975A case history of the application of social judgment theory to policy formulationPolicy Sciences, 6, 137 - 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balke, WM., Hammond, KR., and Meyer, GD1973An alternative approach to labormanagement negotiationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 18, 311 - 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brady, D., and Rappoport, L1973Policy-capturing in the field: The nuclear safeguards problemOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 330 - 347.Google Scholar
  4. Brunswik, E19 52The conceptual framework of psychologyIn: lmernational Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol1, No10University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  5. Brunswik, E1956Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments ( 2nd ed)University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  6. Deane, DH., Hammond, KR., and Summers, DA 1972Acquisition and application of knowledge in complex inference tasksJournal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 20 - 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flack, JE., and Summers, DA1971Computer aided conflict resolution in water resource planning: An illustrationWater Resources Research, 7, 1410 - 1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldberg, LR1971Five models of clinical judgment: An empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representations of the human inference processOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 458 - 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammond, KR1965New directions in research on conflict resolutionJournal of Social Issues, 21, 44 - 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammond, KR(Ed.) 1966The Psychology of Egan BrunswikHolt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Hammond, KR1971Computer graphics as an aid to learningScience, 172, 903 - 908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hammond, KR., and Brehmer, B1973Quasi-rationality and distrust: Implications for international conflictIn: Human Judgment and Social InteractionLRappoport and DA Summers (Eds.)Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp338 - 391.Google Scholar
  13. Hammond, KR., and Joyce, CRB(Eds.) 1975Psychoactive Drugs and Social Judgment: Theory and ResearchWiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Hammond, KR., and Summers, DA1972Cognitive control Psychological Review, 79, 58 - 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammond, KR., Summers, DA., and Deane, DH1973Negative effects of outcome feedback in multiple-cue probability learningOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 30 - 34.Google Scholar
  16. Hammond, KR., Stewart, TR., Brehmer, B., and Steinmann, D01975Social judgment theoryIn: Human Judgment and Decision Processes: Formal and lvlathematical ApproachesMFKaplan and SSchwartz (Eds.)Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins, J1974Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it! American Psychologist, 29, 785 - 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krech, D., and Crutchfield, RS1948Theory and Problems of Social PsychologyMcGrawHill, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Krechevsky, I1932Hypotheses in ratsPsychological Review, 39, 516 - 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindell, MK1973Cognitive and outcome feedback in multiple cue probability learning tasksProgram of Research on Human Judgment and Social Interaction Report No157Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, MJ1973Interpersonal understanding: Laboratory and field investigationsIn: Human Judgment and Social ImeractionLRappoport and DASummers (Eds.)Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp267 - 294.Google Scholar
  22. Slovic, P., Rosov, B., Hoffman, P., Goetsch, J., Earle, T., and Geiseman, R1972Effects of feedback in a multiple-cue learning studyPaper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference on Human Judgment, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  23. Steinmann, DO., and Stewart, T. R1973Measuring the relative importance of community goalsProgram of Research on Human Judgment and Social Interaction Report No156Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
  24. Steinmann, DO., Smith, TH., and Jurdem, L1975Social judgment theory applied to the formulation of land use policyProgram of Research on Human Judgment andGoogle Scholar
  25. Social Interaction Report No174Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
  26. Stewart, TR., and Gelberd, L1972Capturing judgment policy: A new approach for citizen participation in planningProgram of Research on Human Judgment andGoogle Scholar
  27. Social Interaction Report No151Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
  28. Stewart, TR., West, RE., Hammond, KR., and Kreith, F1975a. Improving human judgment in technology assessmentJournal of the International Society for TechnologyAssessment, 2(4), 37-43.Google Scholar
  29. Stewart, TR., Joyce, CRB., and Lindell, MK1975b. The application of judgment theory to clinical trials In: Psychoactive Drugs and Social Judgment: Theory andResearch. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Summers, DA., Taliaferro, JD., and Fletcher, DJ1970Judgment policy and interpersonal learningBehavioral Science, 15, 514 - 521.Google Scholar
  31. Todd, FJ., and Hammond, KR1965Differential feedback in multiple-cue probability learning tasksBehavioral Science, 10, 429 - 435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tolman, EC1948Cognitive maps in rats and menPsychological Review, 55, 189-208Webster's Third New International Dictionary (unabridged)1971Gand CMerriam, Springfield, Mass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations