Skip to main content

The Social Implementation of Cognitive Theory

  • Chapter
Knowing, Thinking, and Believing

Abstract

Krech, Tolman, and Brunswik form the core of what future historians of psychology will call “the Berkeley Group.” These psychologists will be praised, as they have been praised, not only for their academic contributions but also for their efforts to relate their scientific work to the world outside the laboratory. All three tried to implement their ideas, although each sought implementation in a different way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adelman, L., Stewart, TR., and Hammond, KR1975A case history of the application of social judgment theory to policy formulationPolicy Sciences, 6, 137 - 159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balke, WM., Hammond, KR., and Meyer, GD1973An alternative approach to labormanagement negotiationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 18, 311 - 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D., and Rappoport, L1973Policy-capturing in the field: The nuclear safeguards problemOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 330 - 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E19 52The conceptual framework of psychologyIn: lmernational Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol1, No10University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E1956Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments ( 2nd ed)University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, DH., Hammond, KR., and Summers, DA 1972Acquisition and application of knowledge in complex inference tasksJournal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 20 - 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flack, JE., and Summers, DA1971Computer aided conflict resolution in water resource planning: An illustrationWater Resources Research, 7, 1410 - 1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, LR1971Five models of clinical judgment: An empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representations of the human inference processOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 458 - 479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR1965New directions in research on conflict resolutionJournal of Social Issues, 21, 44 - 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR(Ed.) 1966The Psychology of Egan BrunswikHolt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR1971Computer graphics as an aid to learningScience, 172, 903 - 908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR., and Brehmer, B1973Quasi-rationality and distrust: Implications for international conflictIn: Human Judgment and Social InteractionLRappoport and DA Summers (Eds.)Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp338 - 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR., and Joyce, CRB(Eds.) 1975Psychoactive Drugs and Social Judgment: Theory and ResearchWiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR., and Summers, DA1972Cognitive control Psychological Review, 79, 58 - 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR., Summers, DA., and Deane, DH1973Negative effects of outcome feedback in multiple-cue probability learningOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 30 - 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, KR., Stewart, TR., Brehmer, B., and Steinmann, D01975Social judgment theoryIn: Human Judgment and Decision Processes: Formal and lvlathematical ApproachesMFKaplan and SSchwartz (Eds.)Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J1974Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it! American Psychologist, 29, 785 - 795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krech, D., and Crutchfield, RS1948Theory and Problems of Social PsychologyMcGrawHill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krechevsky, I1932Hypotheses in ratsPsychological Review, 39, 516 - 532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, MK1973Cognitive and outcome feedback in multiple cue probability learning tasksProgram of Research on Human Judgment and Social Interaction Report No157Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, MJ1973Interpersonal understanding: Laboratory and field investigationsIn: Human Judgment and Social ImeractionLRappoport and DASummers (Eds.)Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp267 - 294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Rosov, B., Hoffman, P., Goetsch, J., Earle, T., and Geiseman, R1972Effects of feedback in a multiple-cue learning studyPaper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference on Human Judgment, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, DO., and Stewart, T. R1973Measuring the relative importance of community goalsProgram of Research on Human Judgment and Social Interaction Report No156Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, DO., Smith, TH., and Jurdem, L1975Social judgment theory applied to the formulation of land use policyProgram of Research on Human Judgment and

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Interaction Report No174Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, TR., and Gelberd, L1972Capturing judgment policy: A new approach for citizen participation in planningProgram of Research on Human Judgment and

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Interaction Report No151Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, TR., West, RE., Hammond, KR., and Kreith, F1975a. Improving human judgment in technology assessmentJournal of the International Society for TechnologyAssessment, 2(4), 37-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, TR., Joyce, CRB., and Lindell, MK1975b. The application of judgment theory to clinical trials In: Psychoactive Drugs and Social Judgment: Theory andResearch. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, DA., Taliaferro, JD., and Fletcher, DJ1970Judgment policy and interpersonal learningBehavioral Science, 15, 514 - 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, FJ., and Hammond, KR1965Differential feedback in multiple-cue probability learning tasksBehavioral Science, 10, 429 - 435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, EC1948Cognitive maps in rats and menPsychological Review, 55, 189-208Webster's Third New International Dictionary (unabridged)1971Gand CMerriam, Springfield, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hammond, K.R. (1976). The Social Implementation of Cognitive Theory. In: Petrinovich, L., McGaugh, J.L. (eds) Knowing, Thinking, and Believing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1653-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1653-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1655-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1653-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics