Advertisement

Pupillometry: Some Advances, Problems and Solutions

  • Michel Pierre Janisse

Abstract

The study of the pupil has a long history and a rich literature, dating back at least to the ancient Greeks, and scientific reports of pupillary research go back at least two hundred years. This introductory chapter will attempt to provide the reader with an overview of the area by discussing some of its technical, methodological, and control problems and solutions.

Keywords

Pupil Size Pupillary Response Control Slide Stimulus Period Introductory Chapter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, B. B. The effect of the rate and intensity of auditory click stimulation on pupil size, Washington, D. C.: APA September, 1967.Google Scholar
  2. Cronbach, L. J., and Furby, L. How should we measure “change”-or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74(1), 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daly, R. M. Pupillary size and its relationship to the problem solving process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Loyola University, Chicago, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. Gambill, H. P., Ogle, K. N., and Kearns, T. D. Mydriatic effect of four drugs determined with pupillograph. Archives of Opthalmology, 1967, 77, 740–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldwater, B. C. Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 340–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hakerem, G. Pupillography. In, P. H. Venables and Irene Martin (Eds.), Manual of Psycho-physical Methods. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1967.Google Scholar
  7. Hakerem, G., and Sutton, S, Pupillary reactions during observations of near light threshold stimuli. Los Angeles: APA, September, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. Hess, E. H. Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 1965, 212, 46–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hess, E. H. Pupillometrics: a method of studying mental, emotional and sensory processes. In N. S. Greenfield, and R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972, 491–531.Google Scholar
  10. Hess, E. H., Seltzer, A., and Shlien, J. M. Pupil responses of heterosexual and homosexual males to pictures of men and women: a pilot study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 165–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janisse, M. P. Pupil size and affect: a critical review of the literature since 1960, Canadian Psychologist, 1973, 14(4), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janisse, M. P. Pupil size, affect and exposure frequency. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1974. (In press).Google Scholar
  13. Janisse, M. P., and Peavler, W. S. Pupillary research today: emotion in the eye. Psychology Today, 1974, 7(9), 60–63.Google Scholar
  14. Lacey, J. I. The evaluation of autonomic responses: toward a general solution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1956, 67, 123–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lykken, D. T. Range correction applied to heart rate and to GSR data. Psychophysiology, 1972, 9(3), 373–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehr, D. J., and Bergum, B. A. Note on pupillary adaptation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 23, 917–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Libby, W. I., Jr., Lacey, Beatrice, and Lacey, J. I. Pupillary and cardiac activity during visual stimulation. Paper presented at 8th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysical Research, Washington, 1968.Google Scholar
  18. Loewenfeld, Irene E, Mechanisms of reflex dilation of the pupil historical and experimental analysis. Documental Ophthalmologica, 1958, 12, 185–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loewenfeld, Irene E. Comment on Hess’ findings. Survey of Ophthalmology, 1966, 11, 291–294.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, R. L. The clinical validation of the pupillary response: Effect of chromatic and achromatic stimuli upon pupillary responsivity. Dissertation Abstracts, 1967, 27(7-B), 2515.Google Scholar
  21. Schmidt, K., Rose, S. A., and Bridger, W. The law of initial value and neonatal sleep states. Psychophysiology, 1974, 11(1), 44–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simms, T. M. Pupillary response of male and female subjects to pupillary difference in male and female picture stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 553–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simpson, H. M., Molloy, F. M., Hale, S. M., and Climan, M. H. Latency and magnitude of the pupillary response during an imagery task, Psychonomic Science, 1968, 13, 293–294.Google Scholar
  24. Sternbach, R. A. Principles of Psychophysiology. New York: Academic Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Sweeney, J. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada, 1968.Google Scholar
  26. Wilder, J. Modern Psychotherapy and the law of initial values. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1958, 12, 199–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Woodmansee, J. J. An evaluation of the pupil response as a measure of attitude toward Negroes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, 1965.Google Scholar
  28. Woodmansee, J. J. Methodological problems in pupillographic experiments. Proceedings of the 74th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., APA, 1966, 133-134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Pierre Janisse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations