Advertisement

Register Theory and Communicative Teaching

  • Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen

Abstract

In this paper the term ‘register’ will be used in the sense of language-variety according to use. There are two important implications: (i) A difference of register is recognized when there is both a difference of language and a difference of use or situation. If therefore on non-linguistic grounds we distinguish two situation-types but we find no linguistic differences, we have only one register (Halliday et al., 1964); (ii) Registers are not ‘marginal’ varieties of a language but cover between them the whole language. Every language has its own specific register-system, which covers a range of situations. It follows that the foreign learner will have to acquire a knowledge of the register system in the target language. While register awareness in the native speaker grows partly spontaneously (by acquiring the mother-tongue in context), and partly through formal education, the foreign learner obviously goes through the latter process only. This creates the need to explain register differences.

Keywords

Communicative Teaching Language Teaching Register Theory Communicative Competence English Language Teaching 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarts, F.G., 1976, ‘The description of linguistic variation in English: from Firth till the present day’. English Studies 57.Google Scholar
  2. Abercrombie, D., 1963, ‘Conversation and spoken prose’. English Language Teaching, 18Google Scholar
  3. Allen, J.P.B., Widdowson, H.G, 1974, ‘Teaching the communicative use of English’. Iral vol. XII /1.Google Scholar
  4. Baten, L., 1981, Text Comprehension: The parameters of difficulty in narrative and expository prose texts. A redefinition of readability. Unpublished dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana.Google Scholar
  5. Bazell, C.E., Catford, J.C., Halliday, M.A.K, Robins, R.H., 1966, In Memory of J.R. Firth. Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Bellert, I., Weincartner, P., 1982, ‘On different characteristics of scientific text as compared with everyday language texts’. In: Kittredge & Lehrberger, eds.Google Scholar
  7. Candlin, C.N., 1976, ‘Doctors in casualty: applying communicative competence to components of specialist course design’. Irai vol. XIV /3.Google Scholar
  8. Charrow, V., Crandall, J., Charrow, R., 1982, ‘Characteristics and functions of legal language’. In Kittredge & Lehrberger,eds.Google Scholar
  9. Corder, P., 1973, Introducing applied linguistics. Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Corder, P., Roulet, E., eds., 1973, Theoretical linguistic models in applied linguistics. Brussels, Aimay.Google Scholar
  11. Coulthard, M., Montgomery, M., eds., 1982, Studies in discourse analysis. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Crystal, D., Davy, D., 1969, Investigating English style. Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Crystal, D., 1975, The English tone of voice. Arnold.Google Scholar
  14. Dieckmann, W., 1969: Sprache in der Politik. Einführung in die Pragmatik and Semantik der politischen Sprache. Carl Winter Universitätsverslag.Google Scholar
  15. Dijk, T.A., van, 1982, ‘Episodes as units of discourse analysis’ In: Tannen, ed.Google Scholar
  16. Dubin, J., 1982, ‘What every EFL teacher should know about reading’. Forum XX /3.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, J., 1966, ‘On contextual meaning’. In: Bazell et al., eds.Google Scholar
  18. Firth, J., 1935, ‘The technique of semantics’. In: Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford U.P.Google Scholar
  19. Firth, J.R., 1950, ‘Personality and language in society’. In: Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford U.P.Google Scholar
  20. Firth, J.R., 1951, ‘General linguistics and descriptive grammar’.Google Scholar
  21. In: Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford U.P.Google Scholar
  22. Firth, J.R., 1957, ‘A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-55’. In: Palmer, ed.Google Scholar
  23. Fishman, J.A., 1971, ‘The relationship between micro-and macro-sociolinguistics in the study of who speaks what language to whom and when’. In:Pride and Holmes, eds.Google Scholar
  24. Gimson, A.C., 1973, An introduction to the pronunciation of English. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  25. Gregory, M., 1967, ‘Aspects of varieties differentiation’. Journal of Linguistics 3.Google Scholar
  26. Gregory, M., Carroll, S., 1978, Language and situation. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Halliday, M.A.K., McIntosh, A., Strevens, P., 1964, The linguistic sciences and language teaching. Longman.Google Scholar
  28. Halliday, M.A.K., 1970, ‘Language structure and language function’. In: Lyons, ed.Google Scholar
  29. Halliday, M.A.K., 1973, Explorations in the functions of language. Arnold.Google Scholar
  30. Halliday, M.A.K., 1978, Language as social semiotic. Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K., 1980, ‘How is a text like a clause?’. Nobel Symposium on Text Processing. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  31. Holland, V.M., Redish, J.C., 1982, ‘Strategies for understanding forms and other public documents’. In: Tannen, ed.Google Scholar
  32. Huddleston R., Hudson, R.A., Winter, E.O., Henrici, A., 1968, Sentence and clause in scientific English. Osti Report 5030, University College London.Google Scholar
  33. Hymes, D., 1971, ‘On communicative competence’. In: Pride and Holmes, eds.Google Scholar
  34. Kittredge, R., Lehrberger, J., eds., 1982, Sublanguage. Studies of language in restricted semantic domains. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, W., 1969, ‘Some points about aims and means in the foreignlanguage course’. English Language Teaching. Vol. 23 /2Google Scholar
  36. Leech, G., 1966, English in advertising: A linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain. Longman.Google Scholar
  37. Leech, G., Svartvik, J., 1975, A communicative grammar of English. Longman.Google Scholar
  38. Leech, G., Short, M., 1981, Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose.Google Scholar
  39. Longman. Lyons, J., ed., 1970, New horizons in linguistics. Pelican.Google Scholar
  40. Malinowski, B., 1923, ‘The problem of meaning in primitive languages’. Supplement to Ogden and Richards, The meaning of meaning. Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, J.R., 1981a, Register and meta-function. Mimeo. University of Sydney. Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, J.R., 1981b, Lexical cohesion. Mimeo. University of Sydney. Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  43. Martin J.R., 1981c, ‘How many speech acts?’ University of East Anglia Papers in Linguistics. 14 - 15.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, J.R., 1981d, The development of register. Mimeo. University of Sydney. Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  45. Martin, J.R., 1981e, Conjunction: the logic of English text. Mimeo. University of Sydney. Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell, T.F., 1957, ‘The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: a situational statement’. Hesperis.Google Scholar
  47. Munby, J., 1981, Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge U.P. Nash, W., 1980, Designs in prose. Longman.Google Scholar
  48. Palmer, F.R., ed., 1968, Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952–1959. Longman.Google Scholar
  49. Perren, G.E., Trim, J.L.M., eds., 1971, Applications of linguistics. Cambridge U.P.Google Scholar
  50. Pett, J., 1982, ‘Reading: an ESL skill at the university’. Forum XX /3Google Scholar
  51. Pride, J.B., Holmes, J. eds., 1971, Sociolinguistics. Penguin. Reid, T., 1956, ‘Linguistics, structuralism and philology’. Archívum Linguisticum 8.Google Scholar
  52. Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M., 1982-83: ‘News reports and comments’. Studia Germanica Gandensia, XXII.Google Scholar
  53. Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M., 1984, ‘The semantics of political press reportage: a quantitative approach’. Communication & Cognition, Vol. 17, no 4.Google Scholar
  54. Sinclair, J., Coulthard, R., 1975, Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford U.P.Google Scholar
  55. Strevens P., 1977, New orientations in the teaching of English. Oxford U.P.Google Scholar
  56. Tannen, D., ed., 1982, Analyzing discourse: text and talk. Georgetown U.P.Google Scholar
  57. Taylor, C.V., 1983, ‘Structure and theme in printed school text’. Text 3 /2.Google Scholar
  58. Ure, J., 1968, ‘Practical registers’. English Language Teaching, 23/2-3.Google Scholar
  59. Ure, J., 1971, ‘Lexical density and register differentiation’. In: Perren and Trim, eds.Google Scholar
  60. Ure, J., 1982, ‘Introduction: approaches to the study of register range’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 35.Google Scholar
  61. Vandamme, F., 1977, ‘Register-semantics’. Communication & Cognition Google Scholar
  62. Vandamme, F., 1981, ‘The combination of registers. A non-atomistíc. approach’. Werkgroep Pragmatiek en onderwijs, Rijksuniversi- teit Gent. Vol. 36.Google Scholar
  63. Vandamme, F., 1982, ‘De dicto, de re’. Werkgroep ’Registers, kennisrepresentatie, kennisverwerving en -verwerking’, Rijksuniversiteit Gent, Vol. 50.Google Scholar
  64. Vervenne, D., 1983, D., 1983, ‘Concerning analogical reasoning: a register-pragmatic approach to classroom and laboratory contexts’. Paper presented at the 3rd Language and Language Acquisition Conference. Ghent 21 - 25 March 1983.Google Scholar
  65. White, R., 1974, ‘Communicative competence, registers and second language teaching’. Irai X II.Google Scholar
  66. Widdowson, H., 1973, ‘Directions in the teaching of discourse’. In: Corder and Roulet, eds.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of English LinguisticsState University GhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations