Deeper Pathways in High-Energy Physics pp 659-681 | Cite as

# Muon Number Nonconservation in Gauge Theories

## Abstract

Recent rumors of possible observation at SIN (the Swiss Institute of Nuclear Research) of the famous μ→ey process has aroused a great deal of excitement. But the experimentalists themselves have so far not made any public statements; presupposition on our part about their actual result will of course be totally inappropriate. However, regardless of the ultimate outcome of this particular experiment the question of separate conservation of muon and electron number is an interesting and important problem to investigate, especially in the context of unified gauge theories of weak and electromagnetic interactions.

## Keywords

Gauge Theory Neutrino Mass Heavy Neutrino Heavy Lepton Intermediate Vector Boson## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.T. P. Cheng and L. F. Li, to be published in the Phys. Rev. Letters.Google Scholar
- 2.J. D. Bjorken and S. Weinberg, submitted to the Phys. Rev. Letters.Google Scholar
- 3.J. D. Bjorken, K. Lane and S. Weinberg, in preparation.Google Scholar
- 4.F. Wilczek and A. Zee, submitted to the Phys. Rev. Letters.Google Scholar
- 5.For a related discussion of the weak interaction models and the uey process, see the report by H. Fritzsch to this conference.Google Scholar
- 6.S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1264 (1967);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- A. Salam, Elementary Particle Theory, edited by N. Svartholm, ( Almquist, Stockholm 1968 ).Google Scholar
- 7.Such an exercise has been considered before by S. Eliezer and D. A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3080 (1974).Google Scholar
- However their μ→ey calculation has a number of problems: among others it does not satisfy the requirement of (electromagnetic) current conservation and the result has incorrect mass dependences. See also, S. M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Letters 61B, 248 (1976).Google Scholar
- 8.G. Feinberg, Phys. Rev. 110, 1482 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.This cancellation only requires that the electron and muon couple to independent fields. This is reminiscent of the cancellation needed to suppress aGF amplitudes for strangeness changing neutral current effects first discussed by S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970). We shall call it “leptonic GIM mechanism”.Google Scholar
- 10.By “mass-insertion” we mean either the expansion of the fermion propagator or perturbation of the symmetric theory by mass terms: m
_{ij}ΨiΨjGoogle Scholar - 11.S. Parker, H. L. Anderson and C. Rey, Phys. Rev. 133B, 768 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Similar conclusion was reached by A. K. Mann and H. Primakoff, University of Pennsylvania preprint (1976).Google Scholar
- 13.A. Halprin, P. Minkowski, H. Primakoff, and S. P. Rosen, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2567 (1976);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- T. P. Cheng, Univ. of Missouri-St. Louis report, 1975 (unpublished), and Phys. Rev. D 14, 1367 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.In this theory the electron and muon neutrios are two non-orthogonal combinations of the mass eigen-states
*v*and*v*’: v_{e}=*αv*+ β*v*’ and*v*μ= γ*v*+ δ*v*’, with (*v*e ·*v*μ) = αγ + βδ = cosøsinø) m_{e}mμ(m^{2}-m’^{2})/m^{2}m’2 Thus*v*μ + p → e^{+}n can take place with a very small probability. This phenomenon is distinct from the question of “neutrino oscillations” as discussed by B. Pontecorvo, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fix. 53, 1717 (1967) [Soviet Phys. JETP 26, 934 (1968)].Google Scholar - 15.Since our one loop result involves a small factor 6N, multiloop contributions (especially those involving virtual photons) may not be small. Preliminary calculations indicate that they are indeed negligible. In this connection we can use the theorem of G. Feinberg, P. Kabir and S. Weinberg [Phys. Rev. Letters 527 (1959)] to deduce that certain two loop diagrams which are individually large will be cancelled when all diagrams of the same order are summed.Google Scholar
- 16.K. Fujikawa, B. W. Lee and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 6, 2923 (1972);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Y. P. Yao, Phys. Rev. D7, 1647 (1973).Google Scholar
- 17.T. P. Cheng and L. F. Li, in preparation. Details of all our calculations on μ→ey, K→eμ, p→3e and μN→eN, etc. will be given in this paper.Google Scholar
- 18.S. B. Treiman, F. Wilczek and A. Zee (in preparation), and Ref. 17; A. Pais, talk at the Symposium “Five Decades of Weak Interactions”, City College of New York, Jan. 21–22, 1977.Google Scholar
- 19.See for example, S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg to be published in the Phys. Rev.Google Scholar
- 20.P. E. G. Baird et al. and E. N. Fortson et al. Nature 284, 528 (1976);C. Bouchiat’s talk at this conference.Google Scholar
- 21.J. D. Bjorken and C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rev. D 7, 887 (1973); R. M. Barnett’s talk at this conference.Google Scholar
- 22.W. J. Marciano and A. I. Sanda (unpublished).Google Scholar