Advertisement

Squeezed States and Quadratic Hamiltonians: A Wigner Distribution Approach

  • R. Simon

Abstract

For some time now there has been much interest in a special class of quantum states of the radiation field known as squeezed coherent states or simply squeezed states1–5. In fact the first experimental observation of squeezing has been reported very recently6. Squeezed states form a generalization of the coherent states in some sense, the latter being states which behave in the most possible classical way7. Whereas coherent states are minimum uncertainty states having equal fluctuations (zero-point fluctuations) in the two quadratures of the annihilation operator of the field mode, squeezed states have less fluctuation in one at the expense of increased fluctuation in the other quadrature in a manner consistent with the uncertainty principle. From an operator point of view squeezed states are produced from the coherent states by what is equivalent to the Bogolubov transformation. It is interesting to note that different authors discovered or rediscovered the squeezed states under different names - two photon coherent states8, new coherent states9, correlated coherent states10, pulsating states11 and twisted states12 - emphasising different view points of what is essentially one and the same thing.

Keywords

Coherent State Unitary Evolution Gaussian State Phase Curvature Wigner Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature 306: 141 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.M. Nieto, What are squeezed states like? (Los Alamos Preprint).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Takahasi, Information theory of quantum-mechanical channels, Ad.Commun. Syst. 1: 227 (1965).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Stoler, Equivalence classes of minimum uncertainty packets, Phys.Rev.D 1: 3217 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.N. Hollenhorst, Quantum limits on resonant-mass gravitational-radiation detectors, Phys.Rev.D 19: 1669 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. T.S. Santhanam, Generalized coherent states, in “Symmetries in Science”, B. Gruber and R.S. Millman, eds., Plenum: New York (1980).Google Scholar
  7. M. Venkata Satyanarayana, Generalized coherent states and generalized squeezed coherent states, Phys.Rev.D 132: 400 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. J.R. Klauder, These proceedings.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    R.E. Slusher, L.W. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J.C. Mertz, and J.F. Valley, Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity, Phys.Rev.Lett. 55: 2409 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 7.
    J.R. Klauder, and E.C.G. Sudarshan, “Fundamentals of Quantum Optics”, Benjamin, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    H.P. Yuen, Two photon coherent states of the radiation field, Phys.Rev.A 13: 2226 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    A.K. Rajagopal, and J.T. Marshal, New coherent states with applications to time-dependent systems, Phys.Rev.A. 26: 2977 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 10.
    V.V. Dodonov, E.V. Kurmyshev, and V.I. Manko, Generalized uncertainty relations and correlated coherent states, Phys.Lett. 79A: 150 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 11.
    I. Fugiwara, and K. Miyoshi, Pulsating states for quantal harmonic oscillator, Prog.Theor.Phys. 64: 715 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    H.P. Yuen, Contractive states and the standard quantum limits for monitoring free-mass positions, Phys.Rev.Lett. 51: 719 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13.
    H.P. Yuen, and J.H. Shapro, Optical communication with two photon coherent states - Part I: Quantum state propagation and quantum noise reduction, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-24: 657 (1978).Google Scholar
  17. J.H. Shapiro, H.P. Yuen, and Jesus A. Machado Mata, Optical Communication with two-photon coherent states-Part II: Photoemissive detection and structured receiveri performance, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT- 25: 179 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 14.
    C.M. Caves, K.S. Thorne, R.W.P. Drever, V.D. Sandberg, and M. Zimmermann, On the measurement of weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical oscillator I.Issues of principle, Rev.Mod.Phys. 52: 341 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 15.
    P. Broadbridge and C.A. Hurst, Canonical forms for quadratic Hamiltonians, Physica 108A: 39 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. P. Broadbridge and C.A. Hurst, Existence of complex structure for quadratic Hamiltonians, Ann.Phys. 131: 104 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    M. Moshinsky, and T.H. Seligman, Canonical transformations to action and angle variables and their representations in quantum mechanics, Ann.Phys. 114: 243 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 17.
    R. Simon, E.C.G. Sudarshan, and N. Mukunda, Generalized rays in first-order optics: Transformation properties of Gaussian Schell-model fields, Phys.Rev.A 29: 3273 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 18.
    M. Hillery, R.F. O’Connell, M.O. Scully, and E.P. Wigner, Distribution functions in Physics: Fundamentals, Phys.Rep. 106: 121 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 19.
    N. Mukunda, A.P. Balachandran, Jan S. Nilsson, E.C.G. Sudarshan, and F. Zaccaria, Evolution, symmetry and canonical structure in dynamics, Phys.Rev.D 23: 2189 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 20.
    H.J. Carmichael, G.J. Milburn, and D.F. Walls, Squeezing in a detuned parametric amplifier, J.Phys.A 17: 469 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 21.
    M.T. Raiford, Degenerate parametric amplification with time-dependent pump amplitude and phase Phys.Rev.A 9: 2060 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 22.
    R. Simon, E.C.G. Sudarshan, and N. Mukunda, Anisotropic Gaussian Scheel-model beams: Passage through first order optical systems and associated invariants, Phys.Rev.A 31: 2419 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. G.J. Milburn, Multimode minimum uncertainty squeezed states, J.Phys.A 17: 737 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Simon
    • 1
  1. 1.The Institute of Mathematical SciencesMadrasIndia

Personalised recommendations