Polymer and Chain End Structure in Anionic Diene Polymerization

  • S. Bywater
  • D. J. Worsfold


The microstructure of the polybutadiene and polyisoprene produced by anionic polymerization is correlated to the structure of the allylic anion of the active chain end. The charge distribution over this anion is affected greatly by changing counterions, the use of solvating solvents, and the presence of cation chelating additives.

The polymer cis 1,4/trans 1,4 ratio is determined by several factors. Of importance is the cis or trans structure of the ion formed at the moment of reaction, and the rate at which it will isomerize to its equilibrium structure compared to the rate of addition of the next monomer unit. The relative rates of reaction at the two isomeric chain ends can also be important.

Variations in the ratio of 1,4 structures to vinyl structures in the polymers are more difficult to interpret in terms of active chain end structure. Although in general an increase in charge at the Y position in the allyl ion leads to the larger vinyl contents, very wide and apparently irregular variations occur with change in counterion. Some of the largest increases of vinyl structure appear in polymeriza­tions in the presence of chelating diamines, and the complex series of solvates that form are analyzed by means of data from U.V., N.M.R. and kinetic studies.


Active Chain Anionic Polymerization Vinyl Polymer Hydrocarbon Solvent Solvate Dimer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F.W. Stavely and co-workers, Ind. Eng. Chem., 48, 778 (1956).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.J. Worsfold and S. Bywater, Macromolecules, 11, 582 (1978).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Salle and Q-T. Pham, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed., 15, 1799 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.J. Worsfold and S. Bywater, Can. J. Chem., 42, 2884 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Bywater, to be published.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Morton and J.R. Rupert, Initiation of Polymerization,F.E. Bailey, Jr., ed., ACS Symp. Ser. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C., 212, 283 (1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.F. Halasa, D.N. Schulz, D.P. Tate, and V.D. Mochel, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 18, 55 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.F. Halasa, D.F. Lohr and J. Hall, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed., 19, 1357 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Bywater, Y. Firat, and P.E. Black, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed., 22, 669 (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Bywater and D.J. Worsfold, J. Organometal. Chem., 159, 229 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Garton and S. Bywater, Macromolecules, 8, 694 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.W. Langer, Polym. Prepr., Div. of Polymer Chemistry, Am. Chem. Soc., 7(1), 132 (1966).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Collet-Marti, S. Dumas, J. Sledz, and F. Schué, Macromolecules, 15, 251 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Bywater, D.H. MacKerron, and D.J. Worsfold, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed., 23, 1997 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Bywater
    • 1
  • D. J. Worsfold
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Council of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations