Advertisement

Fatigue Resistance of Polybutadienes and Effect of Microstructure

  • Luciano Gargani
  • Mario Bruzzone

Summary

Rubber failure upon application of stress is delayed by: i) viscoelastic energy dissipation and ii) crystallization upon strain of the base polymer. A peculiar rubber failure, namely fatigue failure, is also affected by the same factors. The presence of carbon black or other reinforcing agents does not diminish the contribution of the base polymer on fatigue resistance.

A base polymer particularly interesting as a model for fatigue resistance tests is represented by polybutadiene. Polybutadiene microstructure can be changed at will by making use of existing catalyst systems. In particular, the high vinyl structures are able to show high viscoelastic dissipation and therefore to delay fatigue failure by the mechanism indicated under i). The high cis structures of polybutadiene are capable of crystallizing upon strain and therefore are able to delay fatigue failure by the mechanism indicated under ii).

In this work it is shown that the mechanism ii) is more effective than i) in improving fatigue resistance of polybutadiene. Also a small decrease of chain defects (in particular 1,2 units) in the vicinity of 100% cis content is able to show a substantial improvement in fatigue resistance, both in reinforced and in pure gum polybutadienes.

Keywords

Fatigue Life Fatigue Resistance Base Polymer Elongation Ratio Improve Fatigue Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Bruzzone, A. Carbonaro, L Gargani, Rubber Chem. and Technol., 51, 907 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Carbonaro, L. Gargani, E. Sorta, M. Bruzzone, Proc. Intl. Rubber Conf., Venice, 1979, p. 312.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    A.S.M. Burton, Handbook of Solubility Parameters, C.R.C. Press, Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A. (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    F. Bueche, Rubber Chem. and Technol., 32, 1269 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    C.E. Inglis, Trans. Inst. Nay. Arch., London, 55, 219 (1913).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    A.N. Gent, Strength of Elastomers in “Science and Technology of Rubber”, F.R. Eirich ed., Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    A.A. Griffith, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc., London, A 221 163 (1920). A.A. Griffith, Proc. Intl. Congr. Appl. Mech., Delft, 55 (1924).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    M. Bruzzone, Synthetic Hydrocarbon Rubbers in “Giulio Nattai Present Significance of His Scientific Contribution”, Editrice di Chimica, Milano, Italy (1982), p. 63.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    M. Cesari, G. Perego, A. Zazzetta, L. Gargani, Makromol. Chim., 181, 1143 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciano Gargani
    • 1
  • Mario Bruzzone
    • 1
  1. 1.EniChem Elastomeri S.p.A.Assago, MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations