Advertisement

Basic assumptions in teaching medical sociology in medical schools: the case of West Germany

  • M. Pflanz
  • J. Siegrist

Abstract

It is true and not true as well to say that medical sociology in Germany is a very new branch of sociological and of medical sub-disciplines. Although the term ‘medical sociology’ was not used in Germany before 1955, the idea itself has a long tradition in German medical thinking. We shall not attempt to delineate the whole development of thinking in an area which today we would call medical sociology, but we must mention two classics of medical sociology: the writings of Virchow and Salomon Neumann (around 1848) and the book by Müller-Lyer ‘Sociology of Suffering’ (Soziologie der Leiden 1914). About the same time a more pragmatic approach was chosen by Alfred Grotjahn, the great man of German social hygiene, who emphasized the necessity of a union between social hygiene, and sociology and economics. The Swiss medical historian H. E. Sigerist was already using a sociological approach to the history of medicine when he was teaching at Leipzig, just as he did later in the United States. The most influential figure for an entire generation was probably Viktor von Weizsäcker, one of the most important promoters of medical sociology and psychosomatics in Germany from the early thirties until the years after World War II.

Keywords

Medical Student Federal Republic Medical Faculty Social Medicine Corporate Rationalizer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acheson, R.M. and L. Aird, 1976, Seminars in Community Medicine, Vol. 1, Sociology, Oxford Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. Alford, R.R., 1972, ‘The political economy of health care: Dynamics without change’, Politics and Society, 2, 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badgley, R.F. and S.W. Bloom, 1973, `Behavioral sciences and medical educations; the case of sociology’, Soc. Sci. and Med., 7, 927–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. V. Ferber, C., 1975, Soziologie für Mediziner, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freidson, E., 1975, Doctoring together: A study of professional social control, Elsevier, New York, London, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Geissler, Thoma (Hrsg.), 1974, Medizinsoziologie, Frankfurt, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Kaupen-Haas, H. and H. Döhner, 1976, Sozioäkonomische Bedingungen der Medizinischen Soziologie der BRD, 1. Teil, in Medizinsoziologische Mitteilungen, 2, 1976, 142–172.Google Scholar
  8. Mauksch, H. O., 1970, `Studying the Hospital’, In: R.W. Habenstein (ed.), Pathways to data, p. 185–203, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Pflanz, M., 1962, Sozialer Wandel und Krankheit, Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  10. Pflanz, M., 1973, Die Zunehmende Soziologisierung der Medizin, In: G. Albrecht u.a. Soziologie, Sprache-Bezug zur Praxis-Verhältnis zu anderen Wissenschaften, Westdeutscher Verlag, Köln, Opladen, 588–600.Google Scholar
  11. Pflanz, M., 1975, ‘Relations between social scientists, physicians and medical organizations in health research’, Soc. Sci. and Med., 9, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rohde, J. J., 1974, Soziologie des Krankenhauses, 1. Ed., 1962, 2. Ed., Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  13. Siegrist, J., 1975, Lehrbuch der Med. Soziologie, Urban and Schwarzenberg, München, 2.A.Google Scholar
  14. Siegrist, J. and J.J. Rohde, 1976, ‘Zur Entwickelung der medizinsoziologischen Forschung in der BRD’, Soziologie, 1, 24–38.Google Scholar
  15. Sokolowska, M., 1973, ‘Two basic types of medical orientation’, Soc. Sci. and Med., 7, 807–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Susser, M., 1966, ‘Teaching social medicine in the United States’, Milbank mem. Fd. Quart, 44, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zloczower, A., 1973, Konjunktur in der Forschung. In: F.R. Pfetsch and A. Zloczower, Innovation und Widerstände in der Wissenschaft, 91–150, Bertelsmann, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Pflanz
  • J. Siegrist

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations