Lubrication Studies of Smooth Rubber Contacts

  • A. D. Roberts


By producing optically smooth spheres and cylinders of rubber, it has been possible to study the thickness and contour of a liquid film between surfaces by optical interferometry. Normal approach between surfaces clearly shows the entrapment of a bell of liquid and reveals the load bearing capacity of electrical double layer forces at small distances of separation. In the absence of such forces, a liquid film collapses with time leading to areas of adhesion over most of the contact region. When a normally loaded rubber sphere is slid tangentially, the entrapped bell lifts up its leading edge to form a convergent wedge of liquid capable of supporting the normal load. Such action gives the horseshoe shaped contour typical of elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Recently, the effect of relative spin between contact surfaces has been examined. An unrestrained rubber ball rolled with spin between plates in dry contact experiences tangential contact tractions resulting in a creep motion of the ball perpendicular to its direction of rolling, as anticipated by earlier work. In the presence of a lubricant, there is still creep, but in the opposite perpendicular direction. Tilt between the contact surfaces generated by elastohydrodynamic action clearly contributes to this expected result, though it does not fully explain it.


Liquid Film Rubber Surface Bulk Viscosity Rolling Speed Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. L. Roth, R. L. Driscoll and W. L. Holt, Journal of Research, National Bureau of Standards. 28, p. 439, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. F. Denny, Wear 2, p. 264, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. C. Cohen, Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University, England, 1965.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Dowson and G. R. Higginson, ‘Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication’ Pergamon, Oxford, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Dowson and P. D. Swales, 3rd. International Conference on Fluid Sealing, Cambridge (Cranfield: BHRA), 1967.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Herrebrugh, ASME Journal of Lubricating Technology, 90, p. 262, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. J. Hooke and J. P. O’Donoghue, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 14, p. 34, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. P. Baglin and J. F. Archard, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, EHL Symposium, Leeds, Paper C3, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. F. Moore, ‘Friction and Lubrication of Elastomers’ Pergamon, Oxford, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. D. Roberts and D. Tabor, Proceedings of Royal Society, London, A325, P. 323, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. I. Bailey and J. S. Courtney-Pratt, Proceedings of Royal Society, London, A227, p. 500, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. T. Kirk, Nat., London, 194. p. 965, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Cameron and R. Gohar, Nat, London, 200, p. 458, 1963, Proceedings of Royal Society, London, A291, p. 250, 1966.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Dowson and D. A. Jones, Nat, London, 214, p. 947, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. A. Foord, L. D. Wedeven, F. J. Westlake and A. Cameron, Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London 184 (Pt. 1, No. 28) p. 487, 1969-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. W. Snidle and J. F. Archard, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, EHL Symposium, Leeds, Paper C2, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. R. Paul and A. Cameron, Proceedings of Royal Society, London, A331, p. 171, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Lee, D. M. Sanborn and W. O. Winer, Journal of Lubricating Technology, Paper 73-Lub — D, 1973.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Blok, and H. J. Koens, Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 180 (Pt. 3B), p. 221, 1965-66.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. D. Roberts, Engineering Materials Design 12, p. 55, 1968.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. D. Roberts, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 4, p. 423, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. D. Roberts, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 41, p. 23, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. J. Mysels and M. N. Jones, Discussion Faraday Society, 42, p. 42, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. M. Barclay and R. H. Ottewill, Special Discussion Faraday Society, No. 1, Paper 12, 1970.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. L. Johnson, K. Kendall and A. D. Roberts, Proceedings of Royal Society, London, A324, p. 301, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. L. Johnson, Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, 173, p. 795, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations