Skip to main content

Organizational Choice in Work Design

  • Chapter
Advances in Manufacturing Technology
  • 160 Accesses

Summary

In designing manufacturing systems, most engineers are aware that they are also involved in organizational design. However, for many engineers the assumption made about people in work systems is implicit and their experience in industry is of technically determined task structures within a hierarchical organization. Thus, the possibility of organizational choice is not very apparent. In response to this situation, a method of training engineers in work organization has been developed which employs action learning. Students are actually able to experience and manipulate different forms of work organization and enter into the process of redesign. The simulation is used as an integral component of an introductory course on work organization, and is very rich in the amount of data that it produces; more data can be collected on the performance of the production system and operator behaviour and attitude than would be possible in a real life organization. Differences in performance between different forms of work organization are repeatedly obtained with different groups of students. Measures also show that students perceive and feel significant differences between the different forms of work organization they experience. Action simulation of a work system appears to be a very powerful way of preparing people to investigate possibilities and alternative solutions to work system design problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cox T and Mackay C J (1979) in R G Sell and P Shipley (eds) The impact of Repetitive work Satisfaction in Work Design: Ergonomic and other approaches. Taylor and Francis London. 101-112.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis L E, Canter R R and Hoffman J (1955) Current Job Design Criteria Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 6, 2, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emery F E and Trist E L (1960) in C W Churchman and M. Verhulst (eds) Socio-technical systems Management Science: Models and Techniques. Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hackman J R and Oldham G R (1974) The Job Diagnostic Survey: An Instrument for the Diagnosis of Jobs and the Evaluation of Job Redesign Projects ED099 580. Department of Administrative Sciences, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herbst P G (1974) Socio-technical Design Tavistock Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

P. F. McGoldrick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kember, P., Murray, H., Frost, A. (1986). Organizational Choice in Work Design. In: McGoldrick, P.F. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1355-8_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1355-8_64

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1357-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1355-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics