Advertisement

Hovering Flight of the Dragonfly Aeschna Juncea L., Kinematics and Aerodynamics

  • R. Åke Norberg

Abstract

The kinematics of free unimpeded hovering flight of Aeschna juncea L. was analysed from films taken in the field with 80 frames sec−1, and from still pictures taken with a motorized camera.

The body is held almost horizontal, and the wing stroke plane is tilted 60° relative to the horizontal. In these respects the dragonfly differs strongly from most other hovering animals. The wing beats essentially in the same plane on the downstroke and upstroke. All wings are strongly supinated (pitched-up) during the upstroke. The stroke angle is ca. 60° and the wing beat frequency ca. 36 Hz.

Average, minimum force coefficients were calculated with use of steady-state aerodynamic theory. Calculations were made under several alternative assumptions and gave lift coefficients of 3. 5 to 6. 1, which are all far too large to be explainable with steady-state aerodynamics. At least 60% of the force generated in hovering flight are due to non-steady-state aerodynamics. The pitching rotations of the wings at top and bottom of the stroke are believed to contribute much force, although the exact mechanism is not clear.

At the leading edge of the wing of dragonflies there is a unique morphological arrangement, the node. It permits elastic tension of the leading edge and seems to be an adaptation permitting strong wing twistings. The node may also function as a shock absorber.

Keywords

Force Coefficient Wing Beat Wing Base Upward Force Wing Beat Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fraser, F. C. 1948 A new interpretation of the course of the subcostal vein in the wings of Odonata, with remarks on Zalessky’s notation. Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. (A), 23, 44–50.Google Scholar
  2. Hertel, H. 1966 Structure, Form, Movement. Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York.Google Scholar
  3. Jensen, M. 1956 Biology and physics of locust flight. III. The aerodynamics of locust flight. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 239, 511–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Norberg, R. Å. 1972 The pterostigma of insect wings an inertial regulator of wing pitch. J. comp. Physiol. 81, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Norberg, R. Å. 1974 Hovering flight of the dragonfly Aeschna juncea L. Symp. on Swimming and Flying in Nature, Calif. Institute of Technology. Paper Abstracts, p. 61.Google Scholar
  6. Norberg, U. M. 1974 Hovering flight in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Proc. Symposium on Swimming and Flying in Nature, Pasadena, California, July 8–12.Google Scholar
  7. Osborne, M. F. M. 1951 Aerodynamics of flapping flight with application to insects. J. Exp. Biol. 28, 221–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pennycuick, C. J. 1968 A wind-tunnel study of gliding flight in the pigeon Columba livia. J. Exp. Biol. 49, 509–526.Google Scholar
  9. Schmitz, F. W. 1960 Aerodynamik des Flugmodells. Carl Lange Verlag, Duisburg.Google Scholar
  10. Shapiro, J. 1955 Principles of Helicopter Engineerin. Temple Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Sotavalta, O. 1947 The flight-tone (wing stroke frequency) of insects. Acta ent. fenn. 4, 1–117.Google Scholar
  12. Weis-Fogh, T. 1967 Respiration and tracheal ventilation in locusts and other flying insects. J. Exp. Biol. 47, 561–587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weis-Fogh, T. 1972 Energetics of hovering flight in hummingbirds and in Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 56, 79–104.Google Scholar
  14. Weis-Fogh, T. 1973 Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals including novel mechanisms for lift production. J. Exp. Biol. 59, 169–230.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Åke Norberg
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GöteborgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations