Evoked Potentials: Ensembles of Brain Induced Rhythmicities in the Alpha, Theta and Gamma Ranges

  • Erol Başar
  • Canan Başar-Eroglu
  • Ralph Parnefjord
  • Elke Rahn
  • Martin Schürmann
Part of the Brain Dynamics book series (BD)


This chapter is based on our working hypothesis interpreting the evoked potential (EP) as a stimulus-induced synchronization and enhancement of the spontaneous EEG activity (Başar 1980). According to this hypothesis, the superposition of evoked rhythmicities in several frequency channels can give rise to the compound EP (an example is given in the appendix to this chapter).


Auditory Cortex Visual Evoke Potential Hearing Threshold Evoke Potential Auditory Stimulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Babloyantz A, Nicolis C, Salazar M (1985): Evidence of chaotic dynamics during the sleep cycle. Phys Lett [A] 111:152–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Başar E (1980): EEG Brain Dynamics. Relation between EEG and brain evoked potentials. Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  3. Başar E (1983): Toward a physical approach to integrative physiology. I. Brain dynamics and physical causality. Am J Physiol 254: R510—R533Google Scholar
  4. Başar E (1988): EEG-dynamics and evoked potentials in sensory and cognitive processing by the brain. In: Dynamics of Sensory and Cognitive Processing by the Brain, Başar E, ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag pp. 30–55Google Scholar
  5. Başar E, Başar-Eroglu C, Rahn E, Schürmann M (1991): Sensory and cognitive components of brain resonance responses: an analysis of responsiveness in human and cat brain upon visual and auditory stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol [Stockholm] (in press) pp. 43–77Google Scholar
  6. Başar E, Başar-Eroglu C, Röschke J, Schütt A (1989): The EEG is a quasi-deterministic signal anticipating sensory-cognitive tasks. In: Brain Dynamics, Başar E, Bullock TH, eds. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  7. Başar E, Başar-Eroglu C, Rosen B, Schütt A (1984): A new approach to endogenous event-related potentials in man: relation between EEG and P300-wave. Int J Neurosci 24: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Başar E, Stampfer HG (1985): Important associations among EEG-dynamics, eventrelated potentials, short-term memory and learning. Int J Neurosci 26: 161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Başar E, Ungan P (1973): A component analysis and principles derived for the understanding of evoked potentials of the brain: a study in the hippocampus. Kybernetik 12:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Başar-Eroglu C (1991): Eine vergleichende Studie corticaler und subcorticaler ereigniskorrelierter Potentiale des Katzengehirns. Habilitationsschrift, Medizinische Universität zu LübeckGoogle Scholar
  11. Başar-Eroglu C, Başar E (1987): Endogenous components of event related potentials in hippocampus: an analysis with freely moving cats. In: Current Trends in EventRelated Potential Research, Johnson R Jr, Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier pp. 440–449Google Scholar
  12. Başar-Eroglu C, Başar E (1991): A compound P300–40 Hz response of the cat hippocampus. Int J Neurosci 60:227–237Google Scholar
  13. Başar-Eroglu C, Başar E, Schmielau F (1991b): P300 in freely moving cats with intracranial electrodes. Int J Neurosci 60: 215–216Google Scholar
  14. Başar-Eroglu C, Schmielau F, Schramm U, Schult J (1991a): P300 response of hippocampus with multielectrodes in cats. Int J Neurosci 60: 239–248Google Scholar
  15. Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1968): Measurement and Analysis of Random Data. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
  16. Bullock TH (1990): An agenda for research on chaotic dynamics. In: Chaos in Brain Function, Başar E, ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer pp 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinse HRO, Krüger K, Best J (1991): Temporal structure of cortical information processing: cortical architecture, oscillations, and non-separability of spatio-temporal receptive field organization. In: Neural Cooperativity—Models and Experiments, Krüger J, ed. (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Eckhorn R, Bauer R, Jordan W, Brosch M, Kruse W, Munk M, Reitboeck HJ (1988): Coherent oscillations: a mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? Biol Cybern 60: 121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray CM, Singer W (1987): Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in the cat visual cortex: a cortical function unit. Soc Neurosci Abst 404 : 3Google Scholar
  20. Gray CM, König P, Engel AK, Singer W (1989): Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflect global stimulus properties. Nature 338: 334–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gray CM, Engel AK, König, Singer W (1990): Stimulus-dependent neuronal oscillations in cat visual cortex: receptive field properties and feature dependence. Eur J Neurosci 2: 607–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartline PM (1987): Multisensory convergence. In: Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Adelman G, ed. Boston-Basel-Stuttgart: BirkhäuserGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehmann D (1989): Microstates of the brain in EEG and ERP mapping studies. In: Brain Dynamics. Başar E, Bullock TH, eds. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  24. Llinas RR (1988): The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: insights into central nervous system function. Science 242: 1654–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Picton TW, Hillyard SA, Galambos R (1976): Habituation and attention in the auditory system. In: Auditory System: Clinical and Special Topics, Keidel WD, Neff WD, eds. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer (Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol. V/3)Google Scholar
  26. Solodovnikov VV (1960): Introduction to the Statistical Dynamics of Automatic Control Systems. New York: DoverGoogle Scholar
  27. Stampfer HG, Başr E (1985): Does frequency analysis lead to a better understanding of human event-related potentials? Int J Neurosci 26: 181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sutton S, Braren M, John ER, Zubin J (1965): Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150: 1187–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Tweel LH (1961): Some problems in vision regarded with respect to linearity and frequency response. Ann NY Acad Sci 89: 829–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erol Başar
  • Canan Başar-Eroglu
  • Ralph Parnefjord
  • Elke Rahn
  • Martin Schürmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations