Advertisement

Vascular Muscle Membrane Properties in Hypertension

  • Kent Hermsmeyer
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 34)

Abstract

Although it would be ideal to present a discussion of how the coronary circulation is altered at the cell level in hypertension, there exist virtually no data comparing membrane properties of coronary vascular muscle cells from hypertensive and normotensive animals. However, the elevated peripheral resistance in hypertension is believed to be a predisposing influence to cardiac pathology. In this light, the present chapter is included to identify the changes in vascular muscle that result in increased peripheral resistance and so increase the workload of the heart. It might be hoped that the properties of the coronary circulation will be sufficiently different from the peripheral vasculature that new antihypertensive agents (e.g., perhaps selective Ca2+ antagonists such as nitrendipine) might cause relaxation of specifically the peripheral vasculature without diminishing the regulatory mechanisms operating in the coronary circulation. In any event, the specific comparative study of the coronary vascular muscle cells of normotensive and hypertensive animals is needed.

Keywords

Coronary Circulation Arterial Muscle Peripheral Vasculature Caudal Artery Vascular Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pfeffer MA, Frohlich ED, Pfeffer BA, Weiss AK: Pathophysiological implications of the increased cardiac output of young hypertensive rats. Circ Res (Suppl 1) 34 and 35: I-235-I-242, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pfeffer MA, Frohlich ED: Hemodynamic and myocardial function in young and old normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circ Res (Suppl 1) 32 and 33:I-28-I-38, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Page E, Polimeni PI, Zak R, Earley J, Johnson M: Myofibrillar mass in rat and rabbit heart muscle: correlation of microchemical and stereological measurements in normal and hypertrophic hearts. Circ Res 30: 430, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lund DD, Tomanek RJ: Myocardial morphology of spontaneously hypertensive and aortic-constricted rats. Am J Anat 152: 141, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sen S, Tarazi RC, Bumpus FM: Cardiac hypertro phy and antihypertensive therapy. Cardiovasc Res 11: 427, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tomanek RJ: Selective effects of a-methyldopa on myocardial cell components independent of cell size in normotensive and genetically hypertensive rats. Hypertension 4: 499–506, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tarazi RC, Levy MN: Cardiac responses to increased afterload. Hypertension (Suppl 2) 4:II-8-II-18, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schieken RM, Clarke WR, Lauer RM: Left ventricular hypertrophy in children with blood pressures in the upper quintile of the distribution: the Muscatine Study. Hypertension 3: 669, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brody MJ, Zimmerman BG: Peripheral circulation in arterial hypertension. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 18: 323–340, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abboud FM: The sympathetic system in hypertension. Hypertension (Suppl 2) 4:II-208-II-225, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hermsmeyer K: Membrane potential mechanisms in experimental hypertension. In: Worcel M, et al. (eds) New trends in arterial hypertension. Inserm symposium 17. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical, 1981, pp 175–187.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haeusler G, Finch L: Vascular reactivity to 5-hydroxytryptamine and hypertension in the rat. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 272: 101, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones AW: Altered ion transport in large and small arteries from spontaneously hypertensive rats and the influence of calcium. Circ Res (Suppl 1) 34 and 35:I-117-I-122, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daniel EE, Kwan CY: Control of contraction of vascular muscle: relation to hypertension. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2: 220–222, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Folkow B, Hallback M, Lundgren Y, Weiss L: Structurally based increase of flow resistance in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Acta Physiol Scand 79: 373–378, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lais LT, Brody MJ: Vasoconstrictor hyperresponsiveness: an early pathogenic mechanism in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Eur J Pharmacol 47: 177189, 1978.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones AW, Heidlage JF, Meyer R, Day B, Freeland A: Non-specific supersensitivity of aortic 42K effluxes during DOCA hypertension in the rat, and the effects of anti-hypertensive therapy. In: Worcel M, et al. (eds) New trends in arterial hypertension. Inserm symposium 17. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical, 1981, pp 163–173.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haddy FJ, Pamnani MB, Clough DL: Humoral factors and the sodium-potassium pump in volume expanded hypertension. In: Worcel M, et al. (eds) New trends in arterial hypertension. Inserm symposium 17. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical, 1981, pp 189–199.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hermsmeyer K: Electrogenesis of increased norepinephrine sensitivity of arterial vascular muscle in hypertension. Circ Res 38: 362–367, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hermsmeyer K, Walton S: Specificity of altered electrogenesis of membrane potential in hypertension. Circ Res (Suppl 1) 40:I-153-I-156, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harder DR, Contney SJ, Willems WJ, Stekiel WJ: Norepinephrine effect on in situ venous membrane potential in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol 240: H837 — H842, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Droogmans G, Raeymaekers L, Casteels R: Electroand pharmacomechanical coupling in the smooth muscle cells of the rabbit ear artery. J Gen Physiol 70: 129–148, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trapani A, Matsuki N, Abel PW, Hermsmeyer K: Norepinephrine produces tension through electromechanical coupling in rabbit ear artery. Eur J Pharmacol 72: 87–91, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hermsmeyer K, Trapani A, Abel PW: Membrane potential-dependent tension in vascular muscle. In: Vanhoutte PM, Leusen I (eds) Vasodilatation. New York: Raven, 1981, pp 273–284.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hermsmeyer K: Sodium pump hyperpolarization—relaxation in rat caudal artery. Fed Proc 41, 1982 (in press).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kitamura K, Kuriyama H: Effects of acetylcholine on the smooth muscle cell of isolated main coronary artery of the guinea-pig. J Physiol 293: 119–133, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ito Y, Kitamura K, Kuriyama H: Effects of acetylcholine and catecholamines on the smooth muscle cell of the porcine coronary artery. J Physiol 294: 595–611, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hermsmeyer K, Abel PW, Trapani AJ: Norepinephrine sensitivity and membrane potentials of caudal arterial muscle in DOCA—salt, Dahl, and SHR hypertension in the rat. Hypertension (Suppl 2) 4:11–49–11–51, 1982.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Webb RC, Bohr DF: Potassium relaxation of vascular smooth muscle from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Blood Vessels 16: 71–79, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Campbell GR, Chamley-Campbell J, Short N, Robinson RB, Hermsmeyer K: Effect of cross-transplantation on normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rat arterial muscle membrane. Hypertension 3: 534–543, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brody MJ: New developments in our knowledge of blood pressure regulation. Fed Proc 40: 2257–2261, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brody MJ, Johnson AK: Role of the anteroventral third ventricle region in fluid and electrolyte balance, arterial pressure regulation, and hypertension. In: Martini L, Ganong WF (eds) Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, vol 6. New York: Raven, 1980, pp 249–292.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abel PW, Hermsmeyer K: Sympathetic cross-innervation of SHR and genetic controls suggests a trophic influence on vascular muscle membranes. Circ Res 49: 1311–1318, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kent Hermsmeyer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations