Scalar Particles in Superstring Models

  • Pierre Binétruy
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 50)


Although the superstring tidal wave seems to have somewhat receded, important progress has been made recently in the detailed knowledge of these theories. After the days of the “superstring revolution” where the possible relevance of strings to the fundamental structure was recognized, came the time when the basic problems of this approach were identified: in particular the painfully large number of possible candidates and the issue of supersymmetry breaking. However, since one has started to address these problems, some definite progress has been made.


Gauge Symmetry Gauge Coupling Supersymmetry Breaking Compact Manifold Heterotic String 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Candelas, G. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B258, 46 (1985).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Gross, J. Harvey, E. Martinec and R. Rohm, Nucl. Phys. B256, 253 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Gross, J. Harvey, E. Martinec and R. Rohm, Nucl. Phys. B267, 75 (1986).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 155B: 151 (1985).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    E. Cremmer, S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, and A. Van Proeyen, Nucl. Phys. B212: 413 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    L. Dixon, in Proceedings of the Summer Workshop in High Energy Physics and Cosmology, Trieste 1987, ed. G.Furlan, J.C.Pati, D.W.Sciama, E.Sezgin and Q.Shafi, ICTP Series in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 4, p. 67.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 366 (1985).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    V. Kaplunovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1036 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    See for example M. Peskin, Proc. of the 1986 Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Particle Physics, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B268: 79 (1986).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    A. Sen, Nucl. Phys. B278: 289 (1986);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Distler, Phys. Lett. 188B: 431 (1987).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    D. Gepner, Nucl. Phys. B296, 757 (1988)Google Scholar
  14. D. Gepner, Phys. Lett. 199B: 380 (1987).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    E.Witten, Nucl. Phys. B188: 513 (1981).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13.
    L.Dixon, J.Harvey, C.Vafa and E.Witten, Nucl. Phys. B261, 678 (1985)Google Scholar
  17. L.Dixon, J.Harvey, C.Vafa and E.Witten, B274, 285 (1986).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 14.
    M. Cvetie, in Proc. of the International Workshop on Superstrings, Composite Structures and Cosmology, College Park, 1987 (World Scientific). S. Hamidi and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B279, 465 (1987).Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, Nucl. Phys. B308: 436 (1988)Google Scholar
  20. S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, Phys. Lett 213B: 443 (1988) and CERN preprint TH-5080;Google Scholar
  21. M. Cvetie, J. Louis and B. Ovrut, Phys. Lett 206B: 227 (1988) and University of Pennsylvania preprint UPR-0380T;Google Scholar
  22. M. Cvetie, J. Molera and B. Ovrut, University of Pennsylvania preprint UPR-0376T;Google Scholar
  23. D. Kutazov, Weizmann Institute preprint WIS-88/55/OctPH;Google Scholar
  24. L.J. Dixon, V.S. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis, SLAC-PUB-4959, UTTG-1989 (1989)Google Scholar
  25. 16.
    P. Binétruy, S.Dawson, M.K. Gaillard and I. Hinchliffe, Phys. Lett. 192B: 377 (1987)Google Scholar
  26. P. Binétruy, S.Dawson, M.K. Gaillard and I. Hinchliffe, Phys. Rev. D37: 2633 (1988).Google Scholar
  27. 17.
    M. Cvetie, Phys. Lett. 229B: 41 (1989).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 18.
    K. Kikkawa and M. Yamasaki, Phys. Lett. 149B: 357 (1984);MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. N. Sakai and I. Senda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 75: 692 (1984)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 19.
    K. Narain, Phys. Lett. 169B: 41 (1986);MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. K. Narain, M. Sarmadi and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B279: 369 (1987).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 20.
    V.P. Nair, A. Shapere, A. Strominger and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B287: 402 (1987);MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. A. Giveon, E. Rabinovici and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B322: 167 (1989).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 21.
    J. Dai, R.G. Leigh and J. Polchinski, preprint UTTG-12–89;Google Scholar
  35. M. Dine, P. Huet and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B322: 301 (1989).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 22.
    P. Ginsparg and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B289: 414. (1987)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 23.
    J. Atick and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B310: 291 (1988).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 24.
    R. Savit, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52: 453 (1980).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 25.
    P. Binétruy, “The issue of supersymmetry breaking in strings,” to be published in Proc. of the XII Symposium on Elementary Particle Physics,Kazimierz, 1989; preprint LAPP-TH-271/89.Google Scholar
  40. 26.
    M. Dine, R. Rohm, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 156B: 55 (1985).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 27.
    P. Binétruy and M.K. Gaillard, Phys. Lett. 232B: 83 (1989); preprint LAPPTH-273/89.Google Scholar
  42. 28.
    S.P. Li, R. Peschanski and C.A. Savoy, Phys. Lett. 178B: 193 (1986)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. 29.
    G. Veneziano and S. Yankielowicz, Phys. Lett. 113B: 231 (1982).Google Scholar
  44. 30.
    S. Ferrara, D. L üst, A. Shapere and S. Theisen, Phys. Lett. 225B: 363 (1989).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. S. Ferrara, D. L üst, A. Shapere and S. Theisen, Phys. Lett 233B: 147 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 31.
    Y. Hosotani, Phys. Lett. 126B: 309 (1983).Google Scholar
  47. 32.
    L. Girardello and M. Grisaru, Nucl. Phys. B194, 65 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 33.
    R. Barbieri, S. Ferrare and C. Savoy, Phys. Lett. 119B: 343 (1989);Google Scholar
  49. A.H. Chamseddine, R. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 970 (1982);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. L. Hall, J. Lykken and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D27: 2359 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 34.
    L. Alvarez-Gaumé, M. Claudson and M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B207, 96 (1982);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. L. Alvarez-Gaumé, J. Polchinski and M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B221, 495 (1983);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. J. Ellis, J.S. Hagelin,D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Phys. Lett. 125B: 275 (1983);Google Scholar
  54. L.E. Ibanez and C. Lopez, Nucl. Phys. B233, 511 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 35.
    M.Dine, V. Kaplunovsky, M.Mangano, C. Nappi and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B259, 549 (1985).Google Scholar
  56. 36.
    A. Font, L.E. Ibanez, H.-P. Nilles and F. Quevedo, Phys. Lett. 210B: 101 (1988).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  57. 37.
    J.Ellis, D.V. Nanopoulos, S.T. Petcov and F. Zwirner, Nucl. Phys. B283, 93 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 38.
    H. Haber, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  59. 39.
    M. Cvetic, Phys. Rev. D37, 2366 (1988).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  60. 40.
    B. Campbell, J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, D.V. Nanopoulos and K.A. Olive, Phys. Lett. 180B: 77 (1986).Google Scholar
  61. 41.
    I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, J.S. Hagelin and D.V. Nanopulos, Phys. Lett. 194B: 231 (1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Binétruy
    • 1
  1. 1.LAPPAnnecy-Le-Vieux CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations