Advertisement

Searches for Higgs Particles in the Decays of Open and Hidden Beauty

  • Juliet Lee-Franzini
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 50)

Abstract

In the past decade we have been inundated by the numerous successes of the Standard Model (SM), the most spectacular of which are the observation of the weak gauge bosons at the predicted masses. [1] However, the mechanism by which masses are given to these originally massless gauge bosons implies the appearance of a physically observable “Higgs” scalar of unspecified mass, which so far has eluded experimental observation.

Keywords

Higgs Mass Final State Interaction Weak Gauge Boson Bismuth Germanate Muon Trigger 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Langacker, in Proceedings of XXIV International Conference on High Energy Physics, eds. R. Kotthaus and J. H. Kuhn, Springer-Verlag (1988) p. 190.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Hall, in Proceedings of XXIV International Conference on High Energy Physics, eds. R. Kotthaus and J. H. Kuhn, Springer-Verlag (1988) p. 335.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.D. Linde, JETP Lett. 23 (1976) 64ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 294.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    K. Eggert, in Proc. of XIV Int. Symp. on Lepton and Photon Interactions, Stanford 1989Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B158 (1979) 295.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    E. Gross and E. Duchovni, Phys. Rev. D38 (1988) 2308.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    P. Langacker, Preprint UPR 0400T (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 220; S. Weinberg, ibid. 223.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    P. Franzini et al., Phys. Rev. D35 (1987) 2883.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    M. I. Vystosky, Phys. Lett. 97B (1980) 159Google Scholar
  12. J. Ellis et al., Phys. Lett. 158B (1985) 417Google Scholar
  13. P. Nason, Phys. Lett. 175B (1986) 223.Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    H. Goldberg and Z. Ryzak, Phys. Lett. 218B (1989) 348.Google Scholar
  15. 12.
    See for. ex. J. Pantaleone, M.E. Peskin, and H. Tye, Phys. Lett. 1 49B (1984) 225.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    G. Faldt, P. Osland and T.T. Wu, Phys. Rev. D38 (1988) 164.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    I. Aznauryan, S. Grigoryan and S. Matinyan, JETP lett. 43 (1986) 646.ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 15.
    J. Lee-Franzini, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A263 (1988) 35Google Scholar
  19. P.M. Tuts, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A265 (1988) 243ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. P. Franzini and J. Lee-Franzini, in Proc. of Oregon Meeting, ed. by R.C. Hwa, World Scientific (1986) p. 1009.Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    M. Narain et al., included in J. Lee-Franzini, in Proc. of XXIV Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, eds. R. Kotthaus and J. H. Kuhn, Springer-Verlag (1988) 1432.Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    P.M. Tuts et al., Phys. Lett. B186 (1987) 233.Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    J.H. Kühn and S. Ono, Phys. Lett. 142B (1984) 436Google Scholar
  24. W.Y. Keung and A. Khare, Phys. Rev. D29 (1984) 2657.ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 19.
    S. Komamiya, in Proc. of the 1985 Int. Symp. on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies (ISLEPH85), eds. M. Konuma and K. Takahashi, Kyoto University, Kyoto (1985) p. 612.Google Scholar
  26. 20.
    H. Albrecht et al., Z. Phys. C42 (1989) 349.Google Scholar
  27. 21.
    S. Dawson, in Proceedings of Storrs Meeting, ed. K. Haller et al., World Scientific (1989) 711.Google Scholar
  28. 22.
    I. Beltrami et al., Nucl. Phys. A451, (1986) 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 23.
    D. Kohler, B.A. Watson and J.A. Becker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 1628.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 24.
    S.J. Freedman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 240.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 25.
    M. Sivertz et al., Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 717.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 26.
    C. Edwards et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 903.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 27.
    T. Kaarsberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 2077.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 28.
    S. Egli et al., PSI Preprint PSI-PR 89–02 (1989).Google Scholar
  35. 29.
    H-L Yu, Preprint IP-ASTP-02–89-R (1989).Google Scholar
  36. 30.
    M. Davier and H. Nguyen Ngoc, Preprint, Lab. de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, ORSAY (1989).Google Scholar
  37. 31.
    T. Yamazaki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1089.Google Scholar
  38. 32.
    R.S. Chivukula and A.V. Manohar, Phys. Lett. B207 (1988) 86.Google Scholar
  39. 33.
    H. Nelson, NA31 Preprint in preparation.Google Scholar
  40. 34.
    R.S. Willey and H.L. Yu, Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 3086.ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 35.
    K. Chadwick et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 (1981) 88.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 36.
    M. Althoff et al., Zeit. Phys. C22 (1984) 219.ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 37.
    W. Bartel et al., Phys. Lett. 132B (1983) 241.Google Scholar
  44. 38.
    M.B. Voloshin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44 (1986) 478.Google Scholar
  45. 39.
    S. Raby and G.B. West, Phys. Rev. D38 (1988) 3488.ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 40.
    T.N. Truong and R.S. Willey, Univ of Pittsburgh Report PITT-89–05 (1989).Google Scholar
  47. 41.
    H.E. Haber et al., Nucl. phys. B294 (1987) 301.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 42.
    CLEO Collaboration, P. Avery et al., contribution to the Lepton and Photon Symposium, Hamburg, 1987.Google Scholar
  49. 43.
    P. M. Tuts, private communication.Google Scholar
  50. 44.
    M.S. Alam et al., Phys. Rev. D40 (1989) 712.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliet Lee-Franzini
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentSUNY at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations