Advertisement

Discriminative Control of Behavior by Drug States

  • Donald A. Overton

Abstract

Centrally acting drugs can be used in place of discriminative stimuli, and often acquire response control with surprising rapidity when used in this way. Also, without discriminative training, the performance of behaviors learned while an animal is drugged may appear conditional upon the drug state present during response acquisition; the response may fail to transfer, or transfer only partially, into different drug states.

Keywords

Stimulus Property Drug State Response Control Shock Level Discriminative Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ader, R., and Clink, D.W. Effects of chlorpromazine on the acquisition and extinction of an avoidance response in the rat. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 1957, 121, 144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnhart, S.S., and Abbott, D.W. Dissociation of learning and meprobamate. Psychol. Rep., 1967, 20, 520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, H. Prolonged measurements of discrimination between alcohol and nondrug states. J.Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1968, 65, 349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, H. Etheredge, E.E., and Miller, N.E. Counterconditioning and extinction of fear fail to transfer from amobarbital to nondrug state. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1965, 8, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry, H.Koepfer, E., and Lutch, J. Learning to discriminate between alcohol and nondrug condition.Psychol. Rep., 1965, 16, 1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry, H.Miller, N.E., and Tidd, G.E. Control for stimulus change while testing effects of amobarbital on conflict. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 1071.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry, H.Wagner, A.R., and Miller, N.E. Effects of alcohol and amobarbital on performance inhibited by experimental extinction. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belleville, R.E. Control of behavior by drug-produced internal stimuli. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1964, 5, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, B.D., and Stein, L. An analysis of the learning deficits produced by scopolamine. Psychopharmacologia (Berl), 1969(a), 14, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, B.D. and Stein, L. Asymmetrical dissociation of learning between scopolamine and WY4036, a new benzodiazepine tranquilizer.Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1969(b), 14, 351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bindra, D., Nyman, K., and Wise, J. Barbiturate-induced dissociation of acquisition and extinction: Role of movement-initiating processes. J.Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1965, 60, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bindra, D. and Reichert, H. Dissociation of movement initiation without dissociation of response choice. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 4, 95.Google Scholar
  13. Bindra, D.and Reichert, H. The nature of dissociation: Effects of transitions between normal nd barbiturate-induced states on reversal learning and habituation. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1967, 10, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bliss, D.K., Sledjeski, M., and Leiman, A. State dependent choice behavior in the rhesus monkey. Neuropsychologica, 1970 (In press).Google Scholar
  15. Bohdanecky, Z., and Jarvik, M.E. The effect of d-amphetamine and physostigmine upon acquisition and retrieval in a single trial learning task. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn., 1967, 170, 58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bradford, J.P., and Macdonald, G.E. Imprinting: Pre- and posttrial administration of pentobarbital and the approach response. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1969, 68, 50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, A., Feldman, R.S., and Moore, J.W. Conditional discrimination learning based on chlordiazepoxide: Dissociation or cue? J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1968, 66, 211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burgoyne, L.M. State dependent learning in the rat. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 1968.Google Scholar
  19. Bustamante, J.A., Jordán, A., Vila, M., Gonzales, A. and Insua, A. State dependent learning in humans. Physiol. Behav., 1970, 5, 793.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bustamante, J.A. Rosselló, A., Jordán, A., Pradera, E., and Insua, A. Learning and drugs. Physiol. Behav., 1968,, 553. Google Scholar
  21. Caird, W.K. An investigation of the effects of alcohol on human learning. Unpublished Progress Report, 1968.Google Scholar
  22. Calhoun, W.H., and Smith, A.A. Effects of scopolamine on acquisition of passive avoidance. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1968, 13, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlson, N. J. The effects of scopolamine on learning, reversal, and rereversal in the T-maze. Amer. Psychol., 1967, 22, 492. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  24. Carlton, P.L., and Vogel, J.R. Studies of the amnesic properties of scopolamine. Psychonomic Science, 1965, 3, 261.Google Scholar
  25. Caul, W.F. Effects of amobarbital on discrimination acquisition and reversal. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1967, 11, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Charney, N.H., and Reynolds, G.S. Tolerance to the behavioral effects of scopolamine in rats. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1967, 77, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen, Chia-Shong. A study of the alcohol-tolerance effect and an introduction of a new behavioral technique. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1968, 12, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cicala, G.A., and Hartley, D.L. Drugs and the learning and performance of fear. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol, 1967, 64, 175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Conger, J. J. The effect of alcohol on conflict behavior in the albino rat. Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol, 1951, 12, 1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cook, L., Davidson, A., Davis, D.J., and Kelleher, R.T. Epinephrine, norepinephrine, and acetylcholine as conditioned stimuli for avoidance behavior. Science, 1960, 131, 990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Crow, L.T. Effects of alcohol on conditioned avoidance responding. Physiol. Behav., 1966, 1, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Crow, L.T. Alcohol state transfer effects with performance maintained by intracranial self-stimulation. Physiol. Behav., 1970, 5, 515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Daly, H.B. Disruptive effects of scopolamine on fear conditioning and on instrumental escape learning. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1968, 66, 579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Doty, L.A., and Doty, B.A. Chlorpromazine-produced response decrements as a function of problem difficulty level. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1963, 56, 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Evans, H.L., and Patton, R.A. Scopolamine effects on a one-trial test of fear conditioning. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 11, 229.Google Scholar
  36. Gardner, L. and McCollough, C. A reinvestigation of the dissociative effects of curareform drugs. Amer. Psychol., 1962, 17, 398. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  37. Giarman, N.J., and Pepeu, G. The influence of centrally acting cholinolytic drugs on brain acetylcholine levels. Brit. J. Pharmacol, 1964, 23, 123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Girden, E. Cerebral mechanisms in conditioning under curare. Amer. J. Psychol, 1940, 53, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Girden, E. and Culler, E.A. Conditioned responses in curarized striate muscle in dogs. J. Comp. Psychol, 1937, 23, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goodwin, D.W., Powell, B., Bremer, D., Haine, H., and Stern, J. Alcohol and recall: State dependent effects in man. Science, 1969, 163, 1358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grossman, S.P., and Miller, N.E. Control for stimulus-change in the evaluation of alcohol and chlorpromazine as fear-reducing drugs. Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1961, 2, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gruber, R.P., Stone, G.C., and Reed, D.R. Scopolamine-induced anterograde amnesia. Int. J. Neuropharmacol, 1967, 6, 187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harris, R.T., and Balster, R.L. Discriminative control of dl-amphetamine and saline of lever choice and response patterning. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 10, 105.Google Scholar
  44. Harris, R.T.and Balster, R.L. An analysis of the function of drugs in the stimulus control of operant behavior. In Thompson, T., and Pickens, R., eds., Stimulus Properties of Drugs. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.Google Scholar
  45. Heistad, G.T. A bio-psychological approach to somatic treatments in psychiatry. Amer. J. Psychiat, 1957, 114, 540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Heistad, G.T. Effects of chlorpromazine and electro-convulsive shock on a conditioned emotional response. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol, 1958, 51, 209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heistad, G.T. and Torres, A.A. A mechanism for the effect of a tranquilizing drug on learned emotional responses. University of Minnesota Medical Bulletin, 1959, 30, 518.Google Scholar
  48. Hill, H.E., Jones, E., and Bell, E.C. State dependent control of discrimination by morphine and pentobarbital. NIMH Addiction Research Center, Lexington, Ky., 1970 (In preparation).Google Scholar
  49. Holmgren, B. Conditional avoidance reflex under pentobarbital. Bol Inst. Estud. Med. Biol (Mexico), 1964, 22, 21.Google Scholar
  50. Holmgren, B. Drug dependent conditioned reflexes. Paper read at International Symposium on Cortical-Subcortical Relationships in Sensory Regulation. Havana, Cuba, 1965.Google Scholar
  51. Iwahara, S., Iwasaki, T., and Hasegawa, Y. Effects of chlorpromazine and homofenazine upon a passive avoidance response in rats.Psychopharmacologia (Berl), 1968, 73, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Iwahara, S. Nagamura, N., and Iwasaki, T. Effect of chlordiazepoxide upon experimental extinction in the straight runway as a function of partial reinforcement in the rat. Japanese Psychological Research, 1967, 9, 128.Google Scholar
  53. Kamano, D.K., and Arp, D. J. Effects of chlordiazepoxide (Librium) on the acquisition and extinction of avoidance responses. Psychopharmacologia (Berl), 1964, 6, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kanzler, A.W. Effect of alcohol on the conditioned emotional response of the albino rat. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, California State College, Long Beach, 1967.Google Scholar
  55. Kubena, R.K., and Barry, H. Two procedures for training differential responses in alcohol and nondrug conditions. J. Pharm. Sci., 1969, 58, 99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kurland, H.D., Cassell, S., and Goldberg, E.M. The effects of chlorpromazine on the transferability of learning in humans. Paper read at Society of Biological Psychiatry, Washington, D.C., 1968.Google Scholar
  57. Lal, H. Control of learned conditioned-avoidance responses (CAR) by amphetamine and chlorpromazine. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 1969, 74, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leiman, A.L., Bliss, D.K., Powers, J.B., and Rosenzweig, M.R. Electrical correlates of drug-dissociated learning. Fed. Proc, 1967, 26, 263. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  59. Levinson, D.M., and Sheridan, C.L. Retention in guinea pigs of monocular pattern discriminations during reversal acquisition with the opposite eye.Psychonomic Science, 1967(a), 7, 239.Google Scholar
  60. Levinson, D.M. and Sheridan, C.L. Acquisition and retention of monocular discriminations in rats as a function of relevant (reversal) or irrelevant opposite-eye training. Psychonomic Science, 1967(b), 8, 475.Google Scholar
  61. Longo, V.G. Behavioral and electroencephalographic effects of atropine and related compounds.Pharmacol. Rev., 1966, 18, 965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Madill, M.F. Alcohol-induced dissociation in humans: A possible treatment technique for alcoholism. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, 1967.Google Scholar
  63. Marriott, A.S., and Spencer, P.S. J. Effects of centrally acting drugs on exploratory behavior in rats. Brit. J. Pharmacol., 1965, 25, 432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Meyers, B. Some effects of scopolamine on a passive-avoidance response in rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.), 1965, 8, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moffett, A., and Ettlinger, G. Opposite responding to position in the light and dark. Neuropsychologia, 1967, 5, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oliverio, A. Effects of scopolamine on avoidance conditioning of mice. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.), 1968, 12, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Osborn, A.G., Bunker, J.P., Cooper, L.M., Frank, G.S., and Hilgard, E.R. Effects of thiopental sedation on learning and memory. Science, 1967, 157, 574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Otis, L.S. Dissociation and recovery of a response learned under the influence of chlorpromazine or saline. Science, 1964, 143, 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Overton, D.A. State-dependent or “dissociated” learning produced with pentobarbital. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1964, 57, 3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Overton, D.A. State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.), 1966, 10, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Overton, D.A. Differential responding in a three choice maze controlled by three drug states. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.), 1967, 77, 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Overton, D.A. Visual cues and shock sensitivity in the control of T maze choice by drug conditions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1968(a), 66, 216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Overton, D.A.Dissociated learning in drug states (state-dependent learning). In Efron, D.H. et al., eds., Psychopharmacology. A review of progress. PHS Publication #1836, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 918, 1968(b).Google Scholar
  74. Overton, D.A. Control of T-maze choice by nicotinic, antinicotinic and antimuscarinic drugs. Proceedings 77th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, 1969, 869.Google Scholar
  75. Paskal, V. Dissociative effects of atropine on a simple learned task in the rat. Undergraduate Research Reports in Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 37, 1962. (Briefly described in Overton, 1968b).Google Scholar
  76. Phillips, S.M. An analysis of state-dependent learning. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of California, Davis, California, 1967.Google Scholar
  77. Ross, D.G. Relationship of method of drug withdrawal to resulting amount of response disruption in reversal learning. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois, 1967.Google Scholar
  78. Rushton, R., Steinberg, H., and Tinson, C. Effects of a single experience on subsequent reactions to drugs. Brit. J. Pharmacol., 1963, 20, 99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Ryback, R. State dependent or “dissociated” learning with alcohol in the goldfish. Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol, 1969, 30, 598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Sachs, E., Weingarten, M., and Klein, N.W., Jr. Effects of chlordiazepoxide on the acquisition of avoidance learning and its transfer to the normal state and other drug conditions. Psychopharmacologia (Berl), 1966, 9, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schuster, C.R., and Brady, J.V. The discriminate control of a food-reinforced operant by interoceptive stimulation. In Thompson, T. and Pickens, R., eds., Stimulus Properties of Drugs. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.Google Scholar
  82. Seymore, J.D. The effect of ethyl alcohol in producing state dependent or “dissociated” learning in rats. M.S. Thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, 1967.Google Scholar
  83. Sherman, A.R. Therapy of maladaptive fear-motivated behavior in the rat by systematic withdrawal of a fear-reducing drug. Behav. Res. Ther., 1967, 5, 121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shillito, E.E. The effect of chlorpromazine and thioridazine on the exploration of a Y maze by rats. Brit. J. Pharmacol, 1967, 30, 258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Shmavonian, B.H. Effects of Serpasil (Rauwolfia serpentina) on fear training. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 1956.Google Scholar
  86. Solomon, R.L., and Turner, L.H. Discriminative classical conditioning in dogs paralyzed by curare can later control discriminative avoidance responses in the normal state. Psychol. Rev., 1962, 66, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stark, L. The inability of scopolamine to induce state-dependent one-trial learning. Fed. Proc., 1967, 26, 613. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  88. Stewart, J. Differential responses based on the physiological consequences of pharmacological agents. Psychopharmacologia (Berl), 1963, 3, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Storm, T., and Caird, W.K. The effects of alcohol on serial verbal learning in chronic alcoholics. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 9, 43.Google Scholar
  90. Tarter, R.E. Dissociative effects of ethyl alcohol. M.A. Thesis, Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1968.Google Scholar
  91. Tenen, S.S. Recovery time as a measure of CER strength: Effects of benzodiazepines, amobarbital, chlorpromazine and amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.), 1967, 12, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vogel, J.R., Hughes, R.A., and Carlton, P.L. Scopolamine, atropine, and conditioned fear. Psychopharmacologia (Berl), 1967, 10, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. White, R.P., Nash, C.B., Westerbeke, E.J., and Possanza, G. J. Phylogenetic comparison of central actions produced by different doses of atropine and hyoscine. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn., 1961, 132, 349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Woodworth, R.S., and Schlosberg, H. Experimental Psychology. New York, Holt and Co., 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald A. Overton
    • 1
  1. 1.Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric InstitutePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations