Advertisement

Neural Activity in the Dentate Gyrus of the Rat During the Acquisition and Performance of Simple and Complex Sensory Discrimination Learning

  • Sam A. Deadwyler
  • Mark O. West
  • Edward P. Christian
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 26)

Summary

Neural activity recorded in the outer molecular layer of the dentate gyrus changes during the course of simple and differential auditory discrimination learning. Such neural activity in the form of time-locked evoked potentials to the conditioned auditory stimulus has been correlated with 1) the acquisition, extinction and reconditioning of a simple discrimination task, and 2) maintained performance of a complex differential discrimination task. Several tests examining the possible influences of behavioral variables have indicated that the above neural activity is not generated by gross changes in the behavior of the animal during the different phases of conditioning. The sensory evoked neural activity in the dentate gyrus has been shown to reflect the inputs of two major hippocampal afferents, the septo-hippocampal fibers, and the perforant path. Recent experiments suggest that such activity may represent not only processes which are directly related to the conditioned status of the auditory stimulus in terms of its behavioral significance, but also the pattern of events which has just preceded that stimulus.

Keywords

Neural Activity Dentate Gyrus Auditory Stimulus Perforant Path Dentate Granule Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Olds, J., The central nervous system and the reinforcement of behavior, Am. Psychol. 24: 114 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adey, W.R., Né urophysiological correlates of information transaction and storage in brain tissue, in: “Progress in Physiology and Psychology,” J. Sprague anTT. Stellar, eds., Academic Press, New York (1966).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graystan, E., K. Lissak, I. Madaas, and H. Donhoffer, Hippocampal electrical activity during the development of conditioned reflexes, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 11: 409 (1959).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Douglas, R.J., The development of hippocampal function: implications for theory and for therapy, in: “The Hippocampus,” vol 2, K. Pribram and R. Isaacson, eds., Plenum Press, New York, (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kilmer, W. and T.A. McLardy, A diffusely preprogrammed but sharply trainable hippocampus model, Intern. J. Neurosci. 2: 241 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marr D., Simple memory: A theory for archicortex. Philo. Trans. Royal Soc. (London), 262: 23 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimble, D.P.,í~ppocampus and internal inhibition, Psych. Bull. 70: 285 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oifón, D.S. and W.A. Feustle, Hippocampal function required for nonspatial working memory, Exp. Brain Res., 41: 380 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moss, M., H. Mahut, and S. Z3–17.-Mb gr~an,ancurrent discrimination learning of monkeys after hippocampal entorhinal, or fornix lesions, J. Neurosci. 1: 227 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halgren, E., N.K. Squires, C.L. Wilson, J.W. Rourbaugh, T.L. Babb, and P.H. Crandall, Endogenous potentials generated in the human hippocampal formation and amygdala by unexpected events. Science 19: 803 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, N.J. and L.R. Squire, Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that, Science 210: 207 (1980).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson, R.F., T.W. Berger, C.F. Cegaysky, M.M. Patterson, R.A. Roemer, T.J. Tyler, and R.A. Young, The search for the engrain, Am. Psychol. 31: 209 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson,-7.F., T.W. Berger, S.D. Berry, F.R. Hoehler, F.E. Kettner, and D.J. Weisz, Hippocampal substrate of classical conditioning, Physiol. Psych. 8:262 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berger, T.W. and R.F. Thompson, Identification of pyramidal cells as the critical elements in hippocampal neuronal plasticity during learning, Proc. Nat. Acad Sci., 75: 1572 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berger, T.W., R.I. Laham, and R.F. Thompson, Hippocampal unit-behavior correlations during classical conditioning, Brain Res., 193: 229 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De acour-J., Conditioned modifications of arousal and unit activity in the rat hippocampus, Exp. Brain Res., 38:95 (1980).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Segal, M. and J. Olds, Activity of units in the hippocampal circuit of the rat during differential classical conditioning, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 82: 195 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Segal, M., Flow of cón Icitioned responses in limbic telencephalic system of the rat, J. Neurophysiol. 36:840 (1973) .Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ranck, J.R., Jr., Discussion II. in: “Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System,” Ciba Fóundation Symposium, New York 58:309 (1977).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Best, M.R. and P.J. Best, The effects of state of conciousess and latent inhibition on hippocampal unit activity in the rat during conditioning, Exp. Neurol. 51: 564 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Keefe, J., and L. NaTE, “The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map,” Oxford University Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ranck, J.B., Jr., Studies on single neurones in the dorsal hippocampal formation and septum in unrestrained rats. I: Behavioral correlates and firing repertoires, Exp. Neurol. 41: 401 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Solomon, P.R., A time and place for everything? Temporal processing views of hippocampal function with specific reference to attention, Physiol. Psych. 8:254 (1980).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deadwyler, S.A., M.O. West, and Lynch G., Synaptically identified slow potentials during behavior, Brain Res., 161: 211 (1979).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deadwyler, S.A., M.O. West, and G. Lynch, Activity of dentate granule cells during learning: Differentiation of perforant path input, Brain Res., 169: 29 (1979).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deadwyler, S.A., M.OTTest, and J.H. Robinson, Entorhinal and septal inputs differentially control sensory-evoked responses in the rat dentate gyros, Science 211: 1181 (1981).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    West, M.O., J.H. Robinson, and S.A. Deadwyler, A dual component sensory evoked potential in the dentate gyros of the chronic rat, Fed. Proc. 39: 1753 (1980).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    West, M.O., E. Christian, J.H. Robinson, and S.A. Deadwyler, Dentate granule cell discharge during conditioning: Relation to movement and theta rhythm, Exp. Brain Res., in press (1981).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Christian, E.P., M.O. West, J.H. Robinson, and S.A. Deadwyler. Effects of opiates on sensory evoked potentials in the dentate gyrus of the chronic rat during conditioning, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 7, 1981.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    West, M.O., E. Christian, J.H. Robinson, and S.A. Deadwyler, Evoked potentials in the dentate gyrus reflect the retention of past sensory events, Neurosci. Lett. (Submitted).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam A. Deadwyler
    • 1
  • Mark O. West
    • 1
  • Edward P. Christian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and PharmacologyBowman Gray School of MedicineWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations