Advertisement

The Value of Small Preserves in Chronically Fragmented Landscapes

  • Mark W. Schwartz
  • Phillip J. van Mantgem

Abstract

The 1990s has ushered in a transition among conservation practitioners from focusing on maximizing quality in preserve acquisition to a “bigger is better” philosophy. This change seems to be driven both by the difficulty in managing many small preserves and an urge to incorporate the concepts of biological sustainability on a regional scale. Bioreserves, bioregions, biosphere reserves, and sustainable development areas are the popular conservation terms for the 1990s. Noss and Cooperrider (1994, 142) assert that the “old model of isolated parks has failed. Unless it contains many millions of acres, no reserve can maintain its biodiversity for long.” Similarly, Pickett and Thompson (1978, 34) define a minimum dynamic area for preserves the “smallest area with a natural disturbance regime which maintains internal recolonization sources.” A variety of authors who have focused on large-scale wilderness preserves have made estimates, based primarily on personal experience, to suggest that anywhere between 25% and 75% of a region must be dedicated to the maintenance of biodiversity to succeed over the long term (sources reviewed in Noss and Cooperrider 1994, 167–172). Within this context, Noss and Cooperrider (1994, 172) refer to U.S. Forest Service Research and Natural Areas with sizes under 1,000 ha as “tiny.”

Keywords

Natural Area Conservation Biology Large Reserve Large Site Conservation Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, A.A. 1985. Private and government-funded conservation programs for endangered insects in California. Natural Areas Journal. 5: 28–39.Google Scholar
  2. Beattie, M. 1995. A broader view. Endangered Species Bulletin. 20: 4–5.Google Scholar
  3. Costanza, R.B. G. Norton and B.D. Haskell. 1992. Ecosystem health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Cottam, G. 1987. Community dynamics on an artificial prairie. In W.R. Jordan, M.E. Gilpin and J.D. Aber, eds. Restoration Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 257–290.Google Scholar
  5. Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Gaston, K.J., T.R. New, and M.J. Samways, eds. 1993. Perspectives on Insect Conservation. Intercept Ltd, Andover, U.K.Google Scholar
  7. Grumbine, R.E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanski, I. 1994. Patch occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, L.D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Herkert, J.R. I 994a. Breeding bird communities of midwestern prairie fragments: The effects of prescribed burning and habitat-area. Natural Areas Journal 14: 128–135.Google Scholar
  11. Herkert, J.R. 1994b. The effects of habitat fragmentation on Midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecological Applications 4: 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobbs, R.J., and L.F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: Implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honing, C.S. 1995. What Barriers? What Bridges? In L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and S.S. Light, eds. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). 1980. World Conservation Strategy. Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  15. Iverson, L.R., R.L. Oliver, D.P. Tucker, P.G. Risser, C.D. Burnett, and R.G. Rayburn. 1989. The Forest Resources of Illinois: An Atlas of Spatial and Temporal Trends. Illinois Natural History Survey special publication 11. Champaign.Google Scholar
  16. Janzen, D.H. 1986. The eternal external threat. In M.E. Soule, ed. Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  17. Kerr, M., E. Ely, V. Lee, and A. Desbonnet. 1994. National Directory of Volunteer Environmental Programs 4th ed. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Rhode Island Sea Grant. EPA 841-B-94–001. Narragansett, R.I.Google Scholar
  18. Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Luken, J.O. 1994. Valuing plants in natural areas. Natural Areas Journal 14: 295–299.Google Scholar
  20. McFall, D, ed. 1991. A Directory of Illinois Nature Preserves. Illinois Department of Conservation, Division of Natural Heritage, Springfield.Google Scholar
  21. Menges, E.S. 1992. Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. In P.F. Fielder, and S.K. Jain, eds. Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation and Management. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Norton, B.G. 1991. Toward Unity among Environmentalists. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Norton, B.G. 1994. On what we should save: The role of culture in determining conservation targets. In P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries, and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds. Systematics and Conservation Evaluations. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Noss, R.F., and A.Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Pickett, S.T.A., and J.N. Thompson. 1978. Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 13: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pimm, S.L. 1991. The Balance of Nature?: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. Polasky, S. 1994. What role for economic considerations in species conservation policy? Endangered Species Update 11 (11): 1–4.Google Scholar
  28. Putnam, R.D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robertson, K.R., and M.W. Schwartz. 1994. Prairie. In The Changing Illinois Environment: Critical Trends. Technical Report of the Critical Trends Assessment Project. Vol. 3: Ecological Resources. Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Springfield, 1–32.Google Scholar
  30. Ricklefs, R.E. 1979. Ecology. 2nd en. Chiron Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz, M.W. 1994. Conflicting goals for conserving biodiversity: Issues of scale and value. Natural Areas Journal 14: 213–216.Google Scholar
  32. Schwartz, M.W., and J.M. Randall. 1995. Valuing natural areas and controlling non-indigenous plants. Natural Areas Journal 15: 98–100.Google Scholar
  33. Shafer, C.L. 1994. Beyond park boundries. In E.A. Cook, and H.N. van Lier, eds. Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  34. Shafer, C.L. 1995. Values and shortcomings of small preserves. Bioscience 45: 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simberloff, D.S., and N.J. Gotelli. 1984. Effects of insularization on plant species richness in the prairie-forest ecotone. Biological Conservation 29: 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simberloff, D., J.A. Farr, J. Cox, and D.W. Mehlman. 1992. Movement corridors-conservation bargains or poor investments. Conservation Biology 4: 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soule, M.E., and D. Simberloff. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves? Biological Conservation 35: 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soule, M.E. 1987. Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strong, D.R. 1992. Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73 (3): 747–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turner, M.G., and R.H. Gardner. 1990. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Ecological Studies, vol. 82. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Westemeier, R.L., and W.R. Edwards. 1987. Prairie-chickens: Survival in the Midwest. In H. Kallman, C.P. Agee, W.R. Goforth, and J.P. Linduska, eds. Restoring America’s Wildlife. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., 119–131.Google Scholar
  42. White, J. 1978. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory technical report, vol. 1. Survey Methods and Results. Illinois Department of Conservation. Springfield.Google Scholar
  43. Wildlands Project. 1992. Largest remaining roadless areas in the continental United States. Map. Wild Earth (Special Issue), 44–45.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark W. Schwartz
    • 1
  • Phillip J. van Mantgem
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Population BiologyUniversity of California-DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Group in EcologyUniversity of California-DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations