Consciousness and Self-Regulation pp 1-18 | Cite as
Attention to Action
- 908 Citations
- 3 Mentions
- 471 Downloads
Abstract
Much effort has been made to understand the role of attention in perception; much less effort has been placed on the role attention plays in the control of action. Our goal in this chapter is to account for the role of attention in action, both when performance is automatic and when it is under deliberate conscious control. We propose a theoretical framework structured around the notion of a set of active schemas, organized according to the particular action sequences of which they are a part, awaiting the appropriate set of conditions so that they can become selected to control action. The analysis is therefore centered around actions, primarily external actions, but the same principles apply to internal actions—actions that involve only the cognitive processing mechanisms. One major emphasis in the study of attentional processes is the distinction between controlled and automatic processing of perceptual inputs (e.g., Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977). Our work here can be seen as complementary to the distinction between controlled and automatic processes: we examine action rather than perception; we emphasize the situations in which deliberate, conscious control of activity is desired rather than those that are automatic.
Keywords
Action Sequence Attentional Resource Dual Task Psychological Refractory Period Human Information ProcessingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Ach, N. (1905). liber die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Gottingen: Vardenhoek.Google Scholar
- Allport, D. A. (1980). Attention and performance. In G. L. Claxton (Ed.), New directions in cognitive psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P. (1972). On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bellman, K. (1979). The conflict behavior of the lizard, Sceloporus Occidentalis, and its implication for the organization of motor behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Boden, M. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Denny-Brown, D., & Yanagisawa, N. (1976). The role of the basal ganglia in the initiation of movement. In M. D. YAHR (Ed.), The basal ganglia. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
- Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.Google Scholar
- Ells, J. G. (1973). Analysis of temporal and attentional aspects of movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 10–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fuster, J. M. (1980). The prefrontal cortex: New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
- Greenwald, A. G., & Shulman, A. G. (1973). On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 70–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Helson, H., & Steger, J. A. (1962). On the inhibitory effect of a second stimulus following the primary stimulus to react. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 201–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. M. (1983). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. PARASURAMAN, R. DAVIES, & J. BEATTY (Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Keele, S. W. (1973). Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.Google Scholar
- Lhermitte, F., Derouesne, J., & Signoret, J-L. (1972). Analyse neuropsychologique du syndrome frontale. Revue Neuropsychologique, 127, 415–440.Google Scholar
- Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Lyon, M., & Robbins, T. (1975). The action of central nervous system drugs: A general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In W. B. ESSMANN & L. VALZELLI (Eds.), Current developments in psychopharmacology, Vol. 2. New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
- Marsden, C. D. (1982). The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia. Neurology, 32, 514–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McDermott, J., & Forgy, C. (1978). Production system conflict resolution strategies. In D. A. WATERMAN & F. HAYES-ROTH (Eds.), Pattern-directed inference systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- McFie, J. (1960). Psychological testing in clinical neurology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 131, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McLean, J. P., & Shulman, G. L. (1978). On the construction and maintenance of expectancies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McLeod, P. D. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McLeod, P. D. (1980). What can probe RT tell us about the attentional demands of movement? In G. E. STELMACH & J. REQUIN (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Milner, B. (1964). Some effects of frontal lobectomy in man. In J. M. WARREN & K. AKERT (Eds.), The frontal granular cortex and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Milner, B. (1982). Some cognitive effects of frontal-lobe lesions in man. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B., 298, 211–226.Google Scholar
- Nelson, H. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 12, 313–324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pew, R. W. (1974). Human perceptual motor performance. In B. H. KANTOWITZ (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Pillsbury, W. B. (1908). Attention. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
- Posner, M. I., & Keele; S. W. (1969). Attention demands of movement. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Applied Psychology. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger. POSNER, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Reason, J. T. (1979). Actions not as planned. In G. UNDERWOOD & R. STEVENS (Eds.), Aspects of consciousness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Reason, J. T. (1983). Lapses of attention. In R. PARASURAMAN, R. DAVIES, & J. BEATTY (Eds.), Varieties of Attention. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Reason, J. T., & Mycielska, K. (1982). Absentminded? The psychology of mental lapses and everyday errors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. (1983). Behavioral effects of psychomotor drugs: Clinical and neuropsychological implications. In I. CREESE (Ed.) Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
- Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rylander, G. (1939). Personality changes after operations on the frontal lobes. Acta Psychiatrica Neurologica Scandinavica, Supplement no. 30.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 298, 199–209.Google Scholar
- Shallice, T., McLeod, P. D., & Lewis, K. (1985). Isolating cognitive modules with the dual task paradigm: Are speech perception and production separate processes? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
- Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spelke, E., Hirst, W., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 205230.Google Scholar
- Treisman,. A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walsh, K. W. (1978). Neuropsychology: A clinical approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar