Advertisement

A Preliminary Study of the Orifice Flow Characteristics of Liquid Nitrogen and Liquid Hydrogen Discharging into a Vacuum

  • J. A. Brennan
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 9)

Abstract

Successful space exploration depends upon, among other things, the ability to store propellants on board the vehicle for long periods of time. There are many problems and uncertainties associated with the storage and handling of propellants in environments at pressures below their triple points. One such problem is propellant loss caused by meteoroid puncture. According to Jazwinski [1] propellant-loss prediction can be divided into four distinct areas, namely, (1) properties of the meteoroid environment which the vehicle traverses, (2) the penetration process by which holes are produced in the vehicle, (3) flow relations for the escaping fuel, and (4) probabilistic evaluation of the fuel losses. The present work is concerned with the problem of flow relations for the escaping propellant.

Keywords

Vapor Bubble Solid Formation Discharge Coefficient Orifice Diameter Liquid Hydrogen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. H. Jazwinski, “A Technique of Evaluating Fuel Losses Due to Meteoroid Puncture and Some Timely Examples” paper presented at Am. Rocket Soc. Lunar Missions Meeting in Cleveland, Ohio (July 17–19, 1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Fluid Meters, Their Theory and Application.” Report of ASME Committee on Fluid Meters, Fifth Edition (1959).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. P. Grace and C. E. Lapple, Trans. ASMS, 73, 639 (1951).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. W. Thrasher and A. C. Binder, Instr. and Automation, 27, 1810 (1954).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. F. Bailey, Trans. ASME, 73, 1109 (1951).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. W. Benjamin and J. G. Miller, Trans. ASME, 63, 419 (1951).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Prandtl, Essentials of Fluid Dynamics, Hofner Publishing Co., New York (1952), p. 169.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. R. Strobridge, NBS Technical Note 129 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. D. Goodwin, D. E. Diller, H. M. Roder, and L. A. Weber, Cryogenics, 2, 2, 81 (Dec. 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. J. Richards, R. B. Jacobs and W. J. Pestalozzi, in Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 4, Plenum Press, New York (1960), p. 272.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. L. Tuve and R. E. Sprenkle, Instruments, 6, 201 (1933).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Brennan
    • 1
  1. 1.CEL National Bureau of StandardsBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations