Advertisement

Weak Neutral Current-Semileptonic Interactions

  • Bruno Borgia
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 12)

Abstract

This review will discuss progress in measurements of semileptonic neutral current interactions without assuming the “standard” model from the beginning. The role of inclusive neutrino scattering in the determinatiosn of the Weinberg angle will be analysed in some detail. Also the most recent determinations of the lepton-quark couplings will be reviewed.

Keywords

Parity Violation Charge Ratio Chiral Coupling Neutral Current Interaction Charged Current Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. J. Sakurai, Proc. Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1977 Baksan Valley Vol. 2, pg. 242.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. M. Sehgal, Proc. Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1978 Purdue, pg. 253.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Q. Hung, J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Lett. 69B: 323 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Q. Hung, J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Lett. 88B: 91 (1979).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22: 579 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19: 1264 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Salam, Elementary Particle Theory, ed. N. Svartholm (Almquist and Wiksells, Stockholm 1969).Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    Exclusive reactions as single pion and Δ (1238) production were used to discriminate against a predominant isoscalar solution. The interpretation of the data however depends largely from details of the model. New results on single π production are re cently available from M. Derrick et al., Argonne, Carnegie, Kansas, Purdue collaboration Phys. Lett. 92B: 363 (1980).Google Scholar
  9. Direct information on the coupling constant β is obtained in deuterium fission by ν¯e, E. Pasierb, H. S. Gurr, J. Lathrop, F. Reines, H. W. Sorbel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43: 96 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 7.
    C. M. Wu, Phys. Lett. 89B: 218 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    A. Entenberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 42: 1198 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    H. Faissner et al., Phys. Rev. D21: 555 (1980).Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    H. Faissner et al., contribution to this Conference.Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    R.P. Feynman, Proc. of Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1972, Balaton.Google Scholar
  15. 12.
    ABCMO collaboration, contribution to this Conference BONN-WA21-int-004.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    L. M. Sehgal, CERN Neutrino Workshop 1978 CERN/SPSC 78-53.Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    J. Bell et al., FIIM collaboration, contribution to Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1979, Bergen, Proceedings pg. 592 Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    ABCDLOS collaboration, contribution to Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1979 Bergen, Proceedings pg. 397 Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    S. Sommars et al., IMSTT collaboration, contribution to this Conference.Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    J. Blietschau et al., ABCMO collaboration, Phys. Lett. 88B: 381 (1979).Google Scholar
  21. 18.
    J. Bell et al., FIIM collaboration, contribution to Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1979, Bergen, Proceedings pg. 592 Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    H. Deden et al., ABCLOS collaboration, Nucl. Phys. B149: l (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    A discussion on the correction due to unseen elastic scattering is contained in the review by U. Amaldi, Proc. Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1979, Bergen, pg. 367, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  24. 21.
    E. Paschos, L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D7: 91 (1973).Google Scholar
  25. 22.
    E. Paschos, Lecture given at the 15th Recontre de Moriond 1980 DO-TH 80: 12.Google Scholar
  26. 23.
    J. J. Sakurai, invited talk at the Topical Conf. on Neutrino Physics at Accelrators 1978 Oxford — UCLA/78/TEP/18 and Invited Lectures to Int. Summer Inst. Desy, Hamburg 1975, CERN TH-2099.Google Scholar
  27. 24.
    QED corrections: J. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D8: 2129 (1973)Google Scholar
  28. A. De Rujula, R. Petronzio, A. Savoy-Navarro, Nucl. Phys. B154: 394 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. WS corrections: S. Sakakibara DO-TH 80: 01 Dortmund (1980).Google Scholar
  30. 25.
    M. Jonker et al., CHARM collaboration, contribution to this Conference.Google Scholar
  31. 26.
    CDHS collaboration, contribution to Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1979 Bergen, Proceedings pg. 392 Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  32. 27.
    J. B. Blietschau et al., Gargamelle collaboration, Nucl. Phys. B118: 218 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 28.
    P. Wanderer et al., HPWF collaboration, Phys. Rev. D17: 1679 (1978).Google Scholar
  34. 29.
    F. S. Merrit et al., CITF collaboration, Phys. Rev. D17: 2199 (1978).Google Scholar
  35. 30.
    P. C. Bosetti et al., ABCLOS collaboration, Phys. Lett. 76B: 505 (1978), see also ref. 19.Google Scholar
  36. 31.
    C. Baltay et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44: 916 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 32.
    L. M. Barkov, review talk at this Conference and L. M. Barkov, M. S. Zolotorev, JETP Lett. 27: 379 (1978).Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    P. Conti et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42: 343 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 34.
    C. Y. Prescott et al., Phys. Lett. 84B: 524 (1979).Google Scholar
  40. 35.
    J. E. Kim, P. Langacker, M. Levine, H. H. Williams, UPR-158T (1980) submitted to Rev. Mod. Phys.Google Scholar
  41. 36. a
    M. Roos, I. Liede, Proc. Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1979, Bergen, pg. 309, Vol. 1. b I. Liede, M. Roos, HU-TFT-79-27.Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    C. Baltay, Proc. 19th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Tokyo 1978, pg. 882.Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D18: 3239 (1978).Google Scholar
  44. L. Wolfenstein, COO-3066-111 (Aug. 1978).Google Scholar
  45. H. Fritzsch, CERN TH-2607 (Nov. 1978).Google Scholar
  46. 39.
    R. N. Cahn, F. J. Gilman, Phys. Rev. D17: 1313 (1978).Google Scholar
  47. 40.
    U. Amaldi, Proc. Int. Conf. on Neutrino 1979, Bergen, pg. 367, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  48. 41.
    K. Winter, Proc. Int. Symp. Lepton and Photon, Batavia 1979, pg. 258.Google Scholar
  49. 42.
    See for example the review talk of F. Wilczek, Proc. Int. Symposium on Lepton, Photon, Batavia 1979 pg. 437 where it is quoted the value sin2θw = 0.19±0.02 in the framework of the SU(5) model.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Borgia
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations