Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics pp 29-59 | Cite as

# Fifty Years of Neutrino Physics: A Few Episodes

## Abstract

On the occasion of the 70^{th} birthday of Edoardo Amaldi, about two years ago, I was invited to give a review talk on Neutrino Physics at the International Assembly of physicists, the major part of which was certainly not composed of neutrino physicists. Then the talk was much simpler than today, since you are all professional “neutrinists”. Notice that I have only 30 minutes at my disposition (instead of 2 hours at the Amaldi Conference). I must avoid the danger of being trivial by telling you the a,b,c of your work. A way out of this difficulty, maybe, is to give a few recollections of such developments in neutrino physics which either are curious and at the same time very important (Pauli, Fermi) or about which I happen to be well informed for various reasons. Thus my talk will be entirely subjective (at a variance with the one I gave at the Amaldi celebration) and will be mainly dedicated to the young gene ration of neutrino investigators, who are well informed about today and yesterday developments, but not so well about old ones. I shall not talk about today problems, of course, since you are all here to discuss them during almost a week. By the way, most of you are used to thinking in terms of 10^{5} – 10^{6} neutrino events and forgot, if you knew it, that 16 years after the Pauli neutrino hypothesis (1930) neutrinos were still considered as undetectable particles, and, as you heard today, they were first revealed in the free state only 25 years after they had been invented.

## Keywords

Neutrino Oscillation Beta Decay Neutral Current Neutrino Experiment Bubble Chamber## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- (1).Pauli: letter (4 December 1930) to a meeting of physicists, among which Geiger and Meitner, taking place in Tübingen. The letter was conserved by Meitner and its content was discussed since 1930. The letter was widely published only after many years. (See, for example: Brown, Phys. Today, September, 1978).Google Scholar
- (2).Pauli, “Septieme Conseil de Physique Solvay 1933”, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1934).Google Scholar
- (3).For accurate measurements in the reaction
^{37}A+e^{−}→^{37}Cl+ν (K-capture) see: Rodeback, Allen, Phys. Rev., 86: 466 (1952). A striking picture of apparent non-conservation of momentum in the beta decay of He into Li and an electron by Csikay and Szaley appeared in Proc. of the Intern. Conf., Paris, Publ. Dunad (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - (4).See for reviews of the subject: Primakov and Rosen, Report on Progress in Physics, 22: 121 (1959); Fiorini, Proc. of the ν’77 Conf., Ed. Nauka, Moscow (1978). Neutrino-less double beta decay has not been observed and upper limits 10
^{−3}− 10^{−4}for the lepton non-conserving relative amplitudes have been set for the double decays^{48}Ca→^{48}Ti (Bardin et al.),^{76}Ge→^{76}Se (Fiorini et al.),^{82}Se→^{82}Kr (Cleveland et al.),^{103}Te→^{103}Xe (Zdelenko et al.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - (5).The first measurements of the
^{3}H beta spectrum were performed by means of proportional counters in 1949: Hanna, Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev., 75: 983 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Curran et al., Phil. Mag., 40: 53 (1949). Then substantial improvements were obtained by using as a
^{3}H source a few molecule thick layer and a magnetic spectrometer, by Bergkvist, CERN Report 69-7: 91 (1969)Google Scholar - Curran et al., Nucl. Phys. B39: 317 (1972). The last and best result is m
_{νe}⩽ 35 eV (90% C. l.) (Tret’jakov et al., Proc. of the Int. Conf. on High Energy Phys., Tbilisi, Vol. II: 118 (1976)). Less accurate measurements have been performed by implanting^{3}H in a Si(Li) detector (Simpson, Proc. ν’79 Conf., Vol. 2: 208).Google Scholar - (6).Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev., 72: 246 (1947)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Puppi, Nuovo Cimento 5: 505, 1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klein, Nature, 161: 897 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee et al., Phys. Rev., 75: 905 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tiomno, Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys., 21: 144 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (7).These experiments gave upper limits as bad as \( {\text{R}}\,{\text{ = }}\frac{{\mu \to e\gamma }} {{\mu \to all}}\, \leq 10\% . \) Values of R were greatly improved in a number of experiments, the bsst of which, performed with a gamma hodoscope and a magnetic spectrometer, gives a limit as good as R→2·10
^{−10}at the 90% c. l. (Anderson, Hofstadter et al., Proc. of the Tokyo International Conference, (1978)). For other similar processes the following limits are obtained \( {{R'}}\,{\text{ = }}\frac{{\mu \to 3e}} {{\mu \to all}}\, \leq 2.10^{ - 9} \) (Korenchenko et al., Proc. of the ν’77 Conference) and \( {{R'' = }}\frac{{\mu ^{\text{ - }} + ^{32} {\text{S}} \to {\text{e}}^{\text{ - }} + ^{32} {\text{S}}}} {{\mu ^{\text{ - }} + ^{32} {\text{S}} \to \nu _\mu + \ldots }} \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{ - 10} \) (Badertscher et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39: 1383 (1977).Google Scholar - (8).Wick, Wightman and Wigner, Phys. Rev. 88: 101 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (9).Bethe, Phys. Rev. 55: 434 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (10).Gamow and Schonberg, Phys. Rev. 59: 539 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (11).Pontecorvo, National Res. Council Canada, Rep. PD 205 (1946)Google Scholar
- Pontecorvo, Helv. Phys. Acta, Suppl. 3: 97 (1950).Google Scholar
- (12).Gamow, Phys. Rev. 70: 505 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (13).Fowler, Appl. J. 127: 551 (1958).Google Scholar
- (14).Pontecorvo, JETP 36: 1615 (1959).Google Scholar
- (15).Markov, Proc. of Int. Conf. on High Energy Phys., Rochester p. 578 (1960).Google Scholar
- (16).Greisen, Proc. Int. Conf. on Instrument High Energy Phys., Interscience Publ. p. 209 (1960).Google Scholar
- (17).Pontecorvo and Smorodinsky, JETP 41: 239 (1961).Google Scholar
- (18).Zeldovich and Smorodinsky, JETP 41: 907 (1961).Google Scholar
- (19).Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. 1: 287 (1963).Google Scholar
- (20).Reines et al., Proc. of the ν’72 Conf. 2: 199.Google Scholar
- (21).Krishnasvami et al., Proc. Roy. Soc. A323: 489 (1971); Osborne et al., Proc. of the ν’72 Conf. 2: 223Google Scholar
- (22).Fowler and Hoyle, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London (1965).Google Scholar
- (23).Colgate and White, Astrophys. J. 143: 626 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (24).Zeldovich, Letters JETP 1: 40 (1965).Google Scholar
- (25).Domagatsky and Zatsepin, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Cosmic Rays 2: 1030 (1965).Google Scholar
- (26).Penzias and Wilson, Appl. J. 142: 419 (1965).Google Scholar
- (27).Dicke et al., Appl. J. 142: 414 (1965).Google Scholar
- (28).Zeldovich and Novikov, Lett. JETP 6: 772 (1967).Google Scholar
- (29).Weinberg, Gravitation and cosmology, John Wiley Inc., New York (1972).Google Scholar
- (30).Gershtein and Zeldovich, Lett, to JETP 4: 174 (1966).Google Scholar
- For cosmological hounds on the mass of neutral leptons see: Lee and Weinherg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39: 165 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dolgav, Visotsky and Zeldovich, Lett. JETP 26: 200 (1977); For cosmological bounds on the number of massless neutrino see: Schvartsman, Lett. JETP 9: 315 (1969)Google Scholar
- Steigman, Schram and Gunn, Phys. Lett. 66B: 202 (1977). See also for other limits on neutrino properties from astrophysics considerations: Bernstein, Riderman and Feinberg, Phys. Rev.,.132 1227 (1963)Google Scholar
- Berg, Marciano and Ruderman, Phys. Rev. D17: 1395 (1978).Google Scholar
- (31).Pontecorvo, JETP 53: 1717 (1967); 13: 281 (1971).Google Scholar
- (32).Gribov and Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. 28B:493 (1969).Google Scholar
- (33).Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. 61B: 248 (1976)Google Scholar
- Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 17: 569 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Comments on nuclear and particle phys. 7: 149 (1977)Google Scholar
- Bilenky and Pontecorvo, Phys. Rep. 41: 226 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (34).Bahcall, Proc. of the ν’72 Conference 1: 29.Google Scholar
- (35).Berezinsky and Zatsepin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 20: 361 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (36).Gershtein et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 1: 106. See also Sutherland et al. Phys. Rev. D13: 2700 (1976); Pethick, Proc. of the ν’79 Conf. 1: 78 Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
- (37).Chudakov et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 1: 155.Google Scholar
- (38).Dolgoshein et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 2: 341.Google Scholar
- (39).Sulak et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 2: 350.Google Scholar
- (40).Domogatsky et al. Proc. of the ν’77 Conf. 1: 115.Google Scholar
- (41).Davis et al. Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 53. The measured rate can be compared with the theoretical rate, which is about twice larger. At this time the computed expected rate is given by Bahcall in: 40 years of stellar energy, Bethe Symposium, Stony Brook, N.Y. (1979).Google Scholar
- (42).Lande et al. Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 887.Google Scholar
- (43).Zatsepin, Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 881.Google Scholar
- (44).See for example: Learned, Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 895.Google Scholar
- (45).Bethe and Peierls, Nature 133: 532 (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (46).Fermi, Nuovo Cimento 1: 11 (1934).Google Scholar
- (47).Reines and Cowan, Phys. Rev. 98: 492 (1953); 113: 273 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (48).Danby et al. Proc. High Energy Conf. at CERN p. 809 (1962).Google Scholar
- (49).Vasilevsky et al. Phys. Lett. 1: 345 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (50).Kobzarev and Okun, JETP 41: 1205 (1961).Google Scholar
- (51).Kirkwood, Hanna and Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev. 75: 982 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (52).Davis, Phys. Rev. 97: 766 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (53).Pontecorvo, JETP 33: 549 (1957).Google Scholar
- (54).Pontecorvo, JETP 37: 1751 (1959).Google Scholar
- (55).Nguyen Van Hieu and Pontecorvo, JETP Lett. 7: 137 (1968).Google Scholar
- (56).Pontecorvo and Ryndin, Proc. Kiev Int. High Energy Phys. Conf. p. 233 (1959).Google Scholar
- (57).Bludman, Nuovo Cimento 9: 433 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (58).Zeldovich, JETP 36: 964 (1959)Google Scholar
- Bouchiat and Bouchiat, Phys. Lett. 48B: 111 (1974).Google Scholar
- (59).Barkov and Zolotarev, Proc. of the ν’78 Conf. p. 423.Google Scholar
- (60).Prescott et al. Phys. Lett. 77B: 347 (1978).Google Scholar
- (61).See for example: Conversi, Int. Conf. of the Europ. Phys. Soc., Geneva (1979).Google Scholar