Advertisement

Lexical Derivatives in Patients’ Speech: Some New Data on Displacement and Defense

  • Donald P. Spence
Part of the The Downstate Series of Research in Psychiatry and Psychology book series (DSRPP, volume 1)

Abstract

During an hour toward the end of the first six months of her analysis, a patient of Paul Gray’s “began to speak of her success at overcoming shyness at work. She said this was allowing her, during the past several days, to persuade her boss that the company could, in fact, pay her way to a neighboring state for a week during the coming month for research purposes which would be valuable for the company” (Gray, 1973, p. 479).

Keywords

Cervical Cancer Surface Structure Deep Structure Terminal Illness Target Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, J. D. The phrasal lexicon. Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Workshop presented at M.I.T., June, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edelson, M. Language and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Gill, M. M. Topography and systems in psychoanalytic theory. New York: International Universities Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray, P. Psychoanalytic technique and the ego’s capacity for viewing intrapsychic activity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1973, 21, 474–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Howes, D. A word count of spoken English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 572–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins, J. J. Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it! American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mosteller, F. & Wallace, D. L. Inference and disputed authorship: The Federalist. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1964.Google Scholar
  9. Schmale, A. H., & Iker, H. P. The affect of hopelessness and the development of cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1966, 28, 714–721.Google Scholar
  10. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Weisman, A. & Hackett, T. P. Predilection to death. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1961, 23, 232–255.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald P. Spence
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers Medical SchoolPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations