Advertisement

Some Assumptions of Psychoanalytic Communication: Implications of Subliminal Research for Psychoanalytic Method and Technique

  • Howard Shevrin
Part of the The Downstate Series of Research in Psychiatry and Psychology book series (DSRPP, volume 1)

Abstract

Communication in psychoanalysis is of a very special nature. Although two people talk to each other, it is not merely conversation. Although words are spoken, it does not altogether depend on language. Although the main intent of both parties is to be understood, it is the difficulties in communication which are at the heart of the matter. Finally, although much is said, it is mainly what remains unspoken that is important. Communication meeting these requirements is not ordinary; it is constrained by a method, requiring that one person reveal his thoughts unsparingly to the other person who is listening carefully enough to identify gaps, confusions, inconsistencies, and contradictions in the communication, as well as the tenor of expressed and intimated feelings. The psychoanalyst’s third ear is glued to a psychic stethoscope which magnifies the otherwise unheard stirrings in the unconscious that point to underlying disorder. Further, a special relationship quickly develops between the people involved in this enterprise. Once we recognize that psychoanalytic communication is not ordinary conversation, nor simply one person giving an account of himself to another, but constitutes a highly specialized and uniquely constrained form of dialogue, then we can appreciate how important it is to arrive at some clear idea as to what this method is and what its assumptions are. Further, it is important to know how this method is related to: (1) a body of confirmatory or supportive evidence, and (2) particular applications in a given case (technique).

Keywords

Convergent Evidence Subliminal Stimulus Subliminal Perception Previous Office American Psychoanalytic Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basch, M. Perception consciousness in Freud’s ‘Project’. Annual Psychoanalysis, 1975, in press.Google Scholar
  2. Bevan, W. Subliminal stimulation: A pervasive problem for psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 1964, 61:81–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixon, N. F. Subliminal perception: Nature of a controversy. London: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, C. A study of the preliminary stages of the construction of dreams and images. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1957, Vol. 5, No. 1, 5–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. Standard Edition, 1: 283–344. London: Hogarth Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition, 19:3–63. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  7. Klein, G. S. Consciousness in psychoanalytic theory: Some implications for current research in perception. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1959, 7:5–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Libet, B., Alberts, W. W., Wright, E. W., & Feinstein, B. Responses of human somatosensory cortex to stimuli below threshold for conscious sensation. Science, 1967, 158:1597–1600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Libet, B., Alberts, W. W., Wright, E. W., & Feinstein, B. Cortical and thalamic activation in conscious sensory experience. Neurophysiology Studied in Man. Proceedings of a symposium held in Paris at the Faculte des Sciences, July 20–22, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Luborsky, L. Forgetting and remembering (momentary forgetting) during psychotherapy: A new sample. Psychological Issues, 1973, Monograph 30: 29–55. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  11. Luborsky, L. & Blinder, B. Eye fixation and the contents of recall and images as a function of heart rate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964, 18:421–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luborsky, L. & Blinder, B. Looking, recalling, and GSR as a function of defense. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 4: 270–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramzy, I. & Shevrin, H. The nature of the inference process in psychoanalytic interpretations: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. Rapaport, D. The scientific methodology of psychoanalysis. In Collected papers of David Rapaport. New York: McGill, 1944.Google Scholar
  15. Riggs, L. & Whittle, P. Human occipital and retinal potentials evoked by subjectively faded visual stimuli. Vision Research, 1967, 7: 441–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwartz, M. & Rem, M. A. Does the averaged evoked response encode subliminal perception? Psychophysiology, 1975, 12: 390–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shevrin, H. Brain wave correlates of subliminal stimulation, unconscious attention, primary- and secondary-process thinking, and repressiveness. Psychological Issues, 1973, 8:2, Monograph 30, 56–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shevrin, H. Does the averaged evoked response encode subliminal perception? Yes. A reply to Schwartz and Rem. Psychophysiology, 1975, 12: 4, 395–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shevrin, H. & Fritzler, D. Visual evoked response correlates of unconscious mental processes. Science, 1968, 161: 295–298. (a)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shevrin, H. & Fritzler, D. Brain response correlates of repressiveness. Psychological Reports, 1968, 23:887–892. (b)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shevrin, H., Smith, W. H., & Fritzler, D. Repressiveness as a factor in the subliminal activation of brain and verbal responses. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1969, 149: 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shevrin, H., Smith, W. H., & Fritzler, D. Subliminally stimulated brain and verbal responses of twins differing in repressiveness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1970, 76: 39–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shevrin, H., Smith, W. H., & Fritzler, D. Average evoked response and verbal correlates of unconscious mental processes. Psycho-physiology, 1971, 8, 2:149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silverman, L. H. On the role of laboratory experiments in the development of the clinical theory of psychoanalysis: Data on the subliminal activation of aggressive and merging wishes in schizophrenics. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 1975, 2:43–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard Shevrin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Michigan Medical CenterAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations