Shell Size and Natural Selection in Cepaea nemoralis

  • L. M. Cook
  • P. O’Donald


Like many other helicid snails Cepaea nemoralis grows to a definitive adult size, at which point a lip is laid down on the edge of the mouth of the shell. The average maximum shell diameter over most of the range of the species is 20 to 22 mm, but in some regions, notably the Pyrenees, Cantabria and parts of Ireland, there are large-shelled races that reach a mean size of 24 to 30 mm. This geographical distribution has a parallel in the related species Arianta arbustorum, which is for the most part slightly smaller than the typical C. nemoralis but which reaches extremely large dimensions in some mountainous localities (see Cook 1965 where data of C. Oldham are presented). In parts of the range of C. nemoralis where dimensions fall within the typical limits there may be striking changes in mean breadth over short distances in uniform habitats (for example, Wolda 1969).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cameron R. A. D. (1969) The distribution and variation of Cepaea nemoralis L. near Slievecarran, County Clare and County Galway, Eire. Proc. malac. Soc. Lond. 38, 439–450.Google Scholar
  2. Cavalli-Sforza L. & Bodmer W.F. (1970) The Genetics of Human Populations. Freeman & Co., San Francisco (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Di Cesnola A. P. (1907) A first study of natural selection in ‘Helix arbustorum’ (Helicogena) Biometrika5, 387–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook L. M. (1965) Inheritance of shell size in the snail Arianta arbustorurn. Evolution 19, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook L. M. (1967) The genetics of Cepaea nemoralis. Heredity 22, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook L. M. & Peake J. F. (1960) A study of some populations of Cepaea nemoralis L. from the Dartry Mountains, Co. Sligo, Ireland. Proc. malac. Soc. Lond. 34, 1–11.Google Scholar
  7. Cook L. M. & Peake J. F. (1962) Populations of Cepaea nemoralis L. from sand dunes on the Mullaghmore Peninsula, Co. Sligo, Ireland, with a comparison with those from Annacoona. Proc. malac. Soc. Lond. 35, 7–13.Google Scholar
  8. Falconer D. S. (1955) Patterns of response in selection experiments with mice. Cold. Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 20, 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haldane J. B. S. (1954) The measurement of natural selection. Proc. 9th Int. Congr. Genetics. 480-487.Google Scholar
  10. O’Donald P. (1968) Measuring the intensity of natural selection. Nature 220, 197–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. O’Donald P. (1970a) Measuring the change of population fitness by natural selection. Nature Lond. 227, 307–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. O’Donald P. (1970b) Change of fitness by selection for a quantitative character. J. Theoret. Population Biol, 1, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Valen L. (1965) Selection in natural populations. III. Measurement and estimation. Evolution 19, 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weldon W.F.R. (1901) A first study of natural selection in Clausilia laminata (Montagu). Biometrika 1, 109–124.Google Scholar
  15. Wolda H. (1963) Natural populations of the polymorphic landsnail Cepaea nemoralis (L.) Arch, neerl. Zool. 15, 381–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wolda H. (1967) The effect of temperature on reproduction in some morphs of the landsnail Cepaea nemoralis (L.). Evolution 21, 117–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wolda H. (1969) Fine distribution of morph frequencies in the snail Cepaea nemoralis near Groningen. J. Anim. Ecol. 38, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Scientific Publications 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. M. Cook
  • P. O’Donald

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations