Advertisement

Avian Feeding Behaviour and the Selective Advantage of Incipient Mimicry

  • L. P. Brower
  • J. Alcock
  • Jane V. Z. Brower

Abstract

Studies of mimicry have contributed significantly to our understanding of the process of natural selection and are well reviewed by Rettenmeyer (1970). The recent genetical investigation by Clarke, Sheppard & Thornton (1968) on the Malaysian butterfly Papilio memnon L. is of special importance. It confirms for a wholly separate and very different geographical area the conclusions arrived at in earlier genetic analyses of the African mimic, P. dardanus Brown, so admirably summarized by Ford (1964). These genetical studies make it clear that the evolution of mimicry results from the accumulation of numerous changes each of which increases to a small extent the resemblance of the mimic to the model. Consequently the older idea of Punnett (1915) and Goldschmidt (1945) that mimicry evolves by means of saltatory macromutations is no longer tenable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beal F.E.L. (1918) Food habits of the swallows, a family of valuable native birds. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bull 619, 1–28.Google Scholar
  2. Brower J.VZ. (1958) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies, I. The Monarch, Danaus plexippus, and Viceroy, Limenitis archippus archippus. Evolution 12, 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brower L.P., Brower J.VZ. & Collins C.T. (1963) Experimental studies of mimicry. 7. Relative palatability and Müllerian mimicry among neotropical butterflies of the subfamily Heliconiinae. Zoologica 48, 65–85.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke C.A., Sheppard P.M. & Thornton I.W.B. (1968) The genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 254, 37–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coppinger R.P. (1969) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. I. Reactions of wild-caught adult blue jays to novel insects. Behaviour 35, 4–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coppinger R.P. (1970) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am. Nat. 104, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duncan C.J. & Sheppard P.M. (1963) Continuous and quantal theories of sensory discrimination. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 158, 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan C. J. & Sheppard P.M. (1965) Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry. Behaviour 24, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher R. A. (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford E.B. (1964) Ecological genetics. Methuen & Co., London.Google Scholar
  11. Goldschmidt R.B. (1945) Mimetic polymorphism, a controversial chapter of Darwinism. Q. Rev. Biol. 20, 147-164, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morgan L.P. (1900) Animal behaviour. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mostler G. (1935) Beobachtungen zur Frage der Wespenmimikry. Z. Morph. Öekol. Tiere 29, 381–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muhlmann M. (1934) Im Modellversuch küntslich erzeugte Mimikry und ihre Bedeutung für den ‘Nachamer’. Z. Morph. Öekol Tiere 28, 259–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Punnett R.C. (1915) Mimicry in butterflies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rettenmeyer C.W. (1970) Insect mimicry. A. Rev. Ent. 15, 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmidt R.S. (1958) Behavioral evidence on the evolution of Batesian mimicry. Anim. Behav. 16, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schmidt R.S. (1960) Predator behavior and the perfection of incipient mimetic resemblances. Behaviour 15, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheppard P.M. (1961) Recent genetical work on polymorphic mimetic Papilios. Symposia Royal Entomological Society 1, 23–30.Google Scholar
  20. Thorpe W.H. (1963) Learning and Instinct in Animals. Methuen & Co., London.Google Scholar
  21. Windecker W. (1939) Eucheliajacobeae L. und das Schutzrachtenproblem. Z. Morph. Öekol Tiere 35, 84–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Scientific Publications 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. P. Brower
  • J. Alcock
  • Jane V. Z. Brower

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations