Advertisement

Monopole ’83 pp 629-636 | Cite as

Review of Monopole Detection by Ionization/Excitation Techniques

  • Steven P. Ahlen
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 111)

Abstract

The application of conventional particle detection techniques to searches for GUT monopoles has achieved a remarkable degree of respectability considering the pessimistic attitudes in this regard just two years ago. During this two year period a great deal of progress has been achieved in theoretical work regarding the interaction of monopoles with matter and with the use of this work in interpreting results from cosmic ray telescopes which have been set up to look for monopoles. In this review I will briefly summarize the results of the theoretical work, of the implications this has on detection techniques and on results from experiments searching for monopoles.

Keywords

Organic Scintillator Bound State Wave Function Positive Electric Charge Pessimistic Attitude Direct Experimental Search 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S.P. Ahlen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 121 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.P. Ahlen and K. Kinoshita, Phys. Rev. D26, 2347 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Drell, N. Kroll, M. Mueller, S. Parke, and M. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 644 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N.M. Kroll, S.J. Parke, V. Ganapathi and S.D. Drell, in this volume.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.P. Ahlen and G. Tarle, Phys. Rev. D27, 688 (9183).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.M. Ritson, SLAC Report No. SLAC-Pub-2950 (1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.L. Fleischer, P. B. Price and R.M. Walker, Nuclear Tracks in Solids: Principles and Applications, University of California Press, Berkeley (1975).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Goebel, in this volume.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.P. Ahlen, P.B. Price, S. Guo and R.L. Fleischer, in this volume.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Liu, in this volume.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Datta, in this volume.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Cabrera, M. Taber, R. Gardner and J. Bourg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1933 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.S. Turner, E.N. Parker and T.J. Bogdan, Phys. Rev. D26, 1296 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. E.M. Purcell in Magnetic Monopoles, ed., R.A. Carrigan and W.P. Trower (Plenum, New York, 1983), p. 141Google Scholar
  15. J. Arons and R.D. Blandford, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 544 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. E.E. Salpeter, S.L. Shapiro and I. Wasserman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1114 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Dimopoulos, S.L. Glashow, E.M. Purcell and F. Wilczek, Nature 298, 824 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. K. Freese and M.S. Turner, Phys. Lett. 123B, 293 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 14.
    Alexeyev et al. Proc. 18th Inter. Cosmic Ray Conf., Bangalore, India 5, 52 (1983).Google Scholar
  20. D.E. Groom, E.C. Loh, H.N. Nelson and D.M. Ritson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 573 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Bartelt et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 655 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. F. Kajino et al., Proc. 18th Inter. Cosmic Ray Conf., Bangalore, India 5, 56 (1983).Google Scholar
  23. S. Higashi, R. Bonarelli et al., Phys. Lett. 126B. 137 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. G. Tarle, S.P. Ahlen and T.M. Liss, Phys. Rev. Lett, 52, 90 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. T. Mashimo et al., Phys. Lett. 128B, 327 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 15.
    L. Bracci and G. Fiorentini, Phys. Lett. 123B, 493 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 16.
    M.S. Turner, in this volume.Google Scholar
  28. 17.
    E.N. Parker, in this volume.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven P. Ahlen
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations