Monopole ’83 pp 515-550 | Cite as

Summary of Induction Detectors and Techniques

  • Henry J. Frisch
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 111)


I summarize the present experimental limits from induction searches for both free and trapped monopoles. Other topics which were discussed in the induction topical sessions at MONOPOLE’ 83 are the sources of spurious steps in SQUID outputs, the feasibility of room temperature induction detectors, and superconducting shielding. A discussion of the possibility of large area superconducting induction detectors ends the summary.


Magnetic Monopole Ambient Field Prototype Detector Present Experimental Limit Equal Size Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Faraday, Faraday’s Diary, Vol. I, October 17, 1831. Ed. by Thomas Martin; G. Bell & Sons, LTD (1932).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    It should be noted that the effect does not depend on superconductivity.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, for example, the nice review at this conference by Steven Ahlen.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Actually the first observation was on October 17. Figure 1 shows the apparatus of the measurement of Dec. 8 (see Ref. 1).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F.W. Grover, Inductance Calculations, D. Van Nostrand and Co. (1946).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sorry — this is a little silly as the wire is also very long. But it is a small field.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Cabrera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1378 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    SHE Corporation, 4174 Sorrento Valley Blvd., San Diego, CA 92121.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The proceedings are: Magnetic Monopoles, edited by Richard Carrigan, Jr. and W. Peter Trower (Plenum Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Cabrera, in Magnetic Monopoles, op, cit., p. 175.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.D. Tesche et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 384 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. C.C. Tsuei, in Magnetic Monopoles, edited by Richard Carrigan, Jr. and W. Peter Trower (Plenum Press, 1983), p. 201.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    C.D. Tesche, private communication.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    As the purpose of the alternating cells is to decouple the loop from the shield, the equal size cells are the optimum solution. (The source due to a vortex in the shield has an infinite number of Fourier components.) The loops are called macrames by the group as early ones were woven out of wire.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    H.J. Frisch, Monopole ’82, Conference at Wingspread, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    L.W. Alvarez, in Proceedings of the 1975 Symposium on Lepton-Photon Interactions, Stanford 1975, p. 967 (T.W. Kirk, ed.).Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    L.W. Alvarez, LRL Physics Note 470, 1963 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    L.J. Tassie, Nuovo Cimento 38, 1935 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    P.H. Eberhard, LRL Physics Note 506, 1964 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    L.W. Alvarez, Proposal to NASA to Search for Magnetic Monopoles in Returned Samples of Moon Surface Material, Jan. 30, 1966.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    L.W. Alvarez et al., Review of Sci. Inst. 42, 326 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    H. Kolm et al., Phys. Rev. D4, 3260 (1971).Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    P. Eberhard et al., Phys. Rev. D4, 3260 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    L.L. Vant-Hull, Phys. Rev. 173, 1412 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 24.
    E. Goto, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 10, 1413 (1958)ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. E. Goto et al., Phys. Rev. 132, 307 (1963), See alsoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R.L. Fleischer et al., Phys. Rev. 184, 1393 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 25.
    I have converted their number of 95% C.L. to compare to the published result of Eberhard et al. (Ref. 22).Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    Bandwidth?! (Both SQUID and readout).Google Scholar
  30. 27.
    D.E. Morris (LBL), talk at the Monopole ’82 conference, Wingspread, Wisconsin, pp. 203-204, R. Carrigan, Jr. and W. Peter Trower, editors.Google Scholar
  31. 28.
    C. Rubbia, CERN preprint EP 82-01.Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    M. Price, CERN preprint EF 83-02, and paper submitted to this conference.Google Scholar
  33. 30.
    A purely transverse field is shown. For the more general case see the paper by J. Clem submitted to this conference.Google Scholar
  34. 31.
    J. Dupont-Roc et al., Phys. Lett. 28A, 638 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 32.
    e.g. the SHE Corporation DC SQUID. See Ref. 9.Google Scholar
  36. 33.
    R.R. Wilson is a wonderful example.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry J. Frisch
    • 1
  1. 1.Enrico Fermi Institute and Physics DepartmentUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations