Fundamental Problems of Gauge Field Theory pp 345-393 | Cite as

# Stochastic Quantization of Gauge Fields

## Summary

Stochastic quantization of gauge fields is reviewed, with particular attention to the mechanism by which stochastic gauge-fixing resolves the Gribov ambiguity, and the light which this casts on the geometry of gauge orbits. Some geometric properties of gauge orbits are derived, and the difficulty which they present for the Faddeev-Popov method is reviewed. Stochastic quantization is introduced, and it is shown how the Euclidean probability distribution may be determined by a diffusion process with a drift force **K**=−**∇**S, where S=S(A) is the classical Yang-Mills action. The equivalence of the diffusion and Langevin equations is demonstrated. Stochastic gauge-fixing is explained, and it is demonstrated that an additional drift force, called the gauge-fixing force, may be introduced which does not affect expectation values of gauge-invariant quantities because it is everywhere tangent to the gauge orbits. The gauge-fixing force is non-conservative and thus cannot be accommodated in an action formalism. Properties of the gauge-fixing force are explained and it is shown how, by a mechanism of “instability stabilizes”, it concentrates the probability near the interior Ω of the first Gribov horizon. As a new result, the diffusion equation is solved for large values of the gauge-fixing force, the solution being a modified Faddeev-Popov formula, whereby the integration extends only over Ω. Another new result is the ℏ or loop expansion of the effective action for stochastic gauge-fixing, and it is shown that all primitive divergences arize in the iterative calculation of an effective drift force K_{eff}.

## Keywords

Diffusion Equation Gauge Field Langevin Equation Orbit Space Gluon Propagator## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.G. Parisi and Y.-S. Wu, Sci. Sinica
**24**(1981) 483.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 2.G. Jona-Lasinio and P. K. Mitter, “On the Stochastic Quantization of Field Theory”, Comm. Math. Phys. (to be published).Google Scholar
- C. R. Doering, U. of Texas preprints.Google Scholar
- J. R. Klauder, “Stochastic Quantization” in Proceedings of the 1983 Schladming School, Acta Physica Auistrica XXV, Suppl. Springer Verlag (1983) 251.Google Scholar
- 3.J. R. Klauder, “Stochastic Quantization: Application to Field Theory and General Relativity”, preprint, Bell Labs., Murray Hill, N. J.Google Scholar
- 4.H. Hüffel and P. V. Landshoff, “Stochastic Diagrams and Feynman Diagrams”, preprint, CERN-TH. 4120/85Google Scholar
- 5.J. D. Breit, S. Gupta, and A. Zaks, Nucl. Phys.
**B233**(1984) 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - J. Alf aro, “Stochastic Analytic Regularization”, preprint, Trieste, IC/84/92.Google Scholar
- 6.The approach of Ref. 5 has been criticized, Z. Bern and M. B. Halpern, preprint, LBL-19714, UCB-PTH-85/24 and an alternative stochastic regularization has been proposed, Z. Bern, M. B. Halpern, L. Sadun, and C. Taubes, LBL-19900, UCB-PTH-85/29.Google Scholar
- 7.C. M. Bender and F. Cooper, Nucl. Phys B
**219**(1983) 61;MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - E. Gozzi, Phys. Rev. D
**28**(1983) 1922.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.M. Namiki et al, Prog. Theor. Phys
**69**(1983) 1580;Google Scholar - E. Gozzi, Phys. Rev. D
**31**(1985) 1349.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.E. Seiler, I. O. Stamatescu and D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys.
**8239**(1984) 177 and 204.Google Scholar - D. Nesic, “Numerical Study of three-dimensional QCD with Stochastic Gauge Fixing”, thesis, New York University (1985).Google Scholar
- 10.D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys.
**13192**(1981) 259.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.E. Seiler, “Stochastic quantization and Gauge Fixing in Gauge Theories”, in Proceedings of the 1984 Schladming School, Acta Physica Austriaca, Suppl. XXVI, (1984) 259. We refer the reader to this review for a discussion of numerical simulation of the underlying stochastic process.Google Scholar
- 12.V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys.
**8139**(1978) 1.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Phys. Lett.
**25B**(1967) 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D
**10**(1974) 2445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.I am grateful to D. Maison and E. Seiler for discussions of this point.Google Scholar
- 16.D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys.
**8209**(1982) 336. The non-trivial bundle is also discussed here.Google Scholar - 17.I. M. Singer, Comm. Math. Phys.
**60**(1978) 7.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.R. E. Cutkosky “The Gribov Horizon”, preprint, Carnegie Mellon University CMU-HEP84–1, has argued that every gauge orbit passes through Q only once.Google Scholar
- 19.P. Hirschfeld, Nucl. Phys. B
**157**(1979) 37.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.As reported in Ref. 11.Google Scholar
- 21.Private communication.Google Scholar
- 22.An important result, obtained by G. Dell’Antonio (private communication) after the completion of these lectures, is the contruction of the Liapunov function for the case of a lattice discretization with finite volume, thereby proving the existence of the equilibrium distribution for this case, and the correctness of the Instability stabilizes“ scenario. He has also proved the existence of the equilibrium distribution in the limit α → ∞.Google Scholar
- 23.Equations for the connected Green’s function W are given in E. Floratos, J. lliopoulos, D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys.
**B241**(1984) 221, and A. Thomas, “Stochastic Quantization - the Classical Limit”, preprint, Plymouth Polytechnic.Google Scholar