Physics and Chemistry of Small Clusters pp 493-498 | Cite as

# Theoretical Predictions of the Vibrational Frequencies of Singlet Li_{4}

## Abstract

The geometry of the singlet ground state of Li_{4}, has been optimized using gradient methods in a 6–21G and 6–21G* basis using MICROMOLE and HONDO/5 computer programs respectively. The geometries were exhaustively optimized to provide the best energy minimum point at which to calculate the force constant matrix from a finite gradient difference and thus estimate the vibrational frequencies of the cluster. The lowest energy vibration is estimated as 100 to 106 cm in energy and offers a vibronic mechanism to a quasi-tetrahedral triplet state. The triplet geometry was optimized in an ST0–6G basis and both singlet and triplet geometries were compared in a Van Duijneveldt (10s, 2p/4s, 1p) basis with configuration interaction (C.I.) treatment including valence shell single, double, and selected quadruple excitations. The 99 C.I. singlet energy at the 6–21G geometry is -29.782356 au and the 100 C.I. triplet energy at the ST0–6G geometry is -29.754456 au. Three quadruple excitations contributed only 0.064 ev to the singlet, and split-double (11) excitations were more important than quadruple excitations in the triplet C.I. This study suggests an electronic singlet-triplet transition in Li_{4} at about 0.8 ev (1550 nm. wavelength) which may couple with a vibrational mode of about 100 cm^{-1}.

## Keywords

Configuration Interaction Singlet Ground State Lobe Basis Force Constant Matrix Lithium Cluster## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.B. K. Rao, S. N. Khanna and P. Jena, Equilibrium Geometries of Small Metal Clusters and Their Relationship to Crystalline Structure, Solid State Commun. 56:731 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.B. K. Rao, P. Jena and D. D. Shillady, Structural Properties of Microcrystallites, Phys. Rev. 30: 7293 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.C. C. J. Roothaan, New Developments in Molecular Orbital Theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 23:69 (1951).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.S. M. Colwell, A. R. Marshall, R. D. Amos and N. C. Handy, Quantum Chemistry on Microcomputers, Chem. in Britain, p 657, July (1985).Google Scholar
- 5.M. Dupuis, J. Rys and H. F. King, Ab Initio Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field Program, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange No. 403, Indiana University U.S.A.Google Scholar
- 6.S. F. Boys and G. B. Cook, Mathematical Problems in the Complete Quantum Predictions of Chemical Phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32:285 (1960).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.D. D. Shillady and S. Baldwin-Boisclair, Dipole-Optimized Gaussian Orbitals for Rapid Computation of Electrostatic Molecular Potential Contour Maps, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Quantum Biology Symposium No. 6, 105 (1979).Google Scholar
- 8.M. Dupuis and H. F. King, Molecular Symmetry II. Gradient of Electronic Energy with Respect to Nuclear Coordinates, J. Chem. Phys. 68:3998 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.J. S. Binkley, J. A. Pople and W. J. Hehre, Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods 21. Small Split-Valence Basis Sets for First-Row Elements, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102:939 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.D. D. Shillady, Ab Initio Gaussian Lobe SCF Closed Shell Program, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange No. 239, Indiana University, U.S.A.Google Scholar
- 11.F. B. van Duijneveldt, Gaussian Basis Sets for the Atoms H-Ne for use in Molecular Calculations, IBM Publication RJ 945 (No. J6437).Google Scholar