Advertisement

Retrospective Research on Clinical Laboratory Test Results Using a Hospital Information System. A preliminary Report

  • J. H. M. Zwetsloot-Schonk
  • M. Frolich
  • J. H. M. Souverijn

Summary

Test indices are often determined by comparing test results of healthy persons with test results of patients known with the disease. Test indices are, however, dependent on the characteristics of the population used for the calculation of the indices. The population for which the test will be ordered in routine medical practice usually differs from the characteristics of healthy persons and patients with advanced disease. It is necessary to recalculate the indices of a test once it is introduced in routine practice.

We investigated whether or not a general hospital information system can be used for this purpose. Prior considerations are given about the usefulness of a hospital information system.

From the characteristics of the hospital information system of the Leiden University Hospital we concluded that the sensitivity of clinical laboratory tests for the diagnosis of malignant tumors, can be reevaluated using data stored in the hospital information system. As an example we calculated the sensitivity of the prostatic acid phosphatase test for prostatic carcinoma.

Keywords

Quinone Hyperparathyroidism Monophosphate Noma Thymol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N.S. Weis, “Clinical Epidemiology, The Study of the Outcome of Illness”, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.S. Bell, Efficacy …. What’s That?, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 8: 316 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.S. Thompson, Evaluation of diagnostic procedures, a review of the issues, Evaluation of Program Planning 4: 385 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.A. Thibodeau, Evaluating diagnostic tests, Biometrics 37: 801 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.F. Ransohoff and A.R. Feinstein, Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests, New Engl. J. Med. 299: 926 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.R. Bakker and J.L. Mol, Hospital information systems, Effective Health Care 1: 215 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.R. Bakker, Implementation, approach and evaluation of the use of the Leyden University Hospital Information System, in: “Proceedings MEDINFO 77”, D.H. Shires and H. Wolf, eds., North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam (1977).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.R. Bakker, The development of an integrated and cooperative Hospital Information System, Medical Informatics 9: 135 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F.A. Leguit, Integration in a Hospital Information System, a necessity or a luxury, in: “Proceedings MEDINFO 80”, Lindberg and Kaihara, eds., North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.M. Kouwenberg, A. Bongers and A.R. Bakker, Storage structure in a large data base, in: “Proceedings MIE Berlin”, B. Barber, F. Gremy, K. Uberla and G. Wagner, eds., Springer Verlag Berlin (1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.B. Gutman and E.B. Gutman, An “acid” phosphatase occuring in the serum of patients with metastasizing carcinoma of the prostate gland, J. Clin. Invest. 17: 473 (1938).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.T. Yam, Clinical significance of the human acid phosphatases, Am. J. Med. 56: 604 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.G. Foti, J.F. Cooper, H. Herschman and R.R. Malvaez, Detection of prostatic cancer by solid-phase radio-immunoassay of serum prostatic acid phosphatase, New Engl. J. Med. 297: 1357 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.M. Chu, M.C. Wang, W.W. Scott, R.P. Gibbons, D.E. Johnson, J.D. Schmidt, S.A. Loening, G.R. Prout and G.P. Murphy, Immunochemical detection of serum prostatic acid phosphatase, Invest. Urol. 15: 319 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.E. Pontes, B.K. Choe, N.R. Rose, C. Ercole and J.M. Pierce, Clinical evaluation of immunological methods for detection of serum prostatic acid phosphatase, J. Urol. 126: 363 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.R. Quinones, T.J. Rohner, J.R. Drago and L.M. Demers, Will prostatic acid phosphatase determination by radio-immunoassay increase the diagnoses of early prostatic cancer?, J. Urol. 125: 361 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Guinan, I. Bush, V. Ray, R. Vieth, R. Rao and R. Bhatti, The accuracy of the rectal examination in the diagnoses of prostate carcinoma, New Engl. J. Med. 303: 499 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L.A. Klein and P. Shapiro, Role of acid phosphatase measurement in management of prostatic cancer, Urology 17: 550 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.V. Roy, M.E. Brower and J.E. Hayden, Sodium thymolphthalein monophosphate: A new acid phosphatase substrate with greater specificity for the prostatic enzyme in the serum, Clin. Chem. 17: 1093 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. M. Zwetsloot-Schonk
    • 1
  • M. Frolich
    • 2
  • J. H. M. Souverijn
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Development- And Support GroupLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Central Lab. for Clin. Chem.Leiden Univ. HospitalLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations