Data Base Management and Knowledge-Based Systems in Clinical Laboratory Medicine

  • Torgny Groth


Applications of data base management systems and knowledge-based systems are reviewed and discussed with regard to some critical issues in the quality management of clinical laboratories. It could be expected that the new techniques for data-, and knowledge-processing and communication, discussed in this paper, will help the clinical laboratory profession in setting standards, guiding training, disseminating information, and establishing collaboration between the laboratory and the clinic.


Laboratory Information System Data Base Management Data Base Management System Clinical Data Base Clinical Laboratory Medicine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Winkel and B.E. Statland, Assessing cost savings when unnecessary utilization of laboratory tests can be abolished, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 82: 418 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.O. Westgard, T. Groth and C.-H. de Verdier, Principles for developing improved quality control procedures. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 172): 19 (1984).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Groth, H. Falk and J.O. Westgard, A quality control simulator for design and evaluation of internal quality control procedures, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 172): 195 (1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.O. Westgard, P. Barry, M. Hunt and T. Groth, A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry, Clin. Chem. 27: 493 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.W. Bernes, “The Clinical Laboratory in the New Era. Quality, Costs and Diagnostic Demands”, 8th AO Beckman conference, Am. Ass. Clin. Chem. (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.O. Westgard and T. Groth, Computer systems for implementation of internal quality control procedures, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 172): 203 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Groth, Strategies for decreasing interlaboratory variation. Studies by computer simulation, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 171): 331 (1984).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Groth, O. Larsson, T. Aronsson and C.-H. de Verdier, Data base management systems for evaluation of analytical procedures, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 172): 209 (1984).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.M. Valdiguié, P. Fernet and B. Verdier, Transmission of quality control data, in: “Proceedings of Fifth Int. Conf. on Computing in Clinical Laboratories”, Stuttgart (1985).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Sher, Present and future status of computer-based graphics and interpretive systems, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 171): 375 (1984).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.S. Young, Interpretation of clinical chemical data with the aid of automatic data processing, Clin. Chem. 22/10: 1555 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.M. Weiss, S.A. Kulikowski and R.S. Galen, Representing expertise in a computer program. The serum protein diagnostic program, J. Clin. Lab. Autom. 3: 383 (1983).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.W. Abendroth, Evaluation of diagnostic test performance, in “Proceedings of the 10th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care’“, IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington (1986).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Groth and M. Hakman, A PC-workstation supporting interpretation of clinical chemistry laboratory data, (this volume).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.P. Connelly, A system for graphical display of clinical laboratory data, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 78: 729 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E.K. Harris, The effects of reductions in analytic variance on the detection of significant changes in biochemical measurements, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 171): 59 (1984).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Groth, The role of formal biodynamic models in laboratory medicine, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 171): 175 (1984).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.O. Westgard, Quality management, Abstract, Clin. Chem. 32: 1035 (1986).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    “MIMER: The Software Machine. Concepts and Facilities”, Savant Enterprises, Carnforth (1984).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    O. Larsson, T. Groth, L. Melander, H. Modén, W. Schneider, T. Aronsson, B. Billas, C.-H. de Verdier and G. Lundqvist, A data base result evaluation system in the clinical chemical laboratory at the Uppsala university hospital, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44 (suppl. 171): 386 (1984).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. Wiener, Simulating medical reasoning as an active component in laboratory information systems, (this volume).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torgny Groth
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Biomedical Systems AnalysisUppsala University02 UppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations