Experimental Glass Melting Techniques

  • G. E. Blair
Conference paper


The composition range in which glass formation can take place in most systems, depends on the cooling rate from a temperature above the liquidus to the glass transformation temperature. Therefore, any study of a particular system must refer to a uniform cooling rate. In addition, for practical purposes, it is necessary to define the smallest usable volume. This varies from fractions of a gram (in reflective beads) to many kilograms (for massive optics, etc.) Turnbull1 states that any body, however formed, which exhibits diffraction behaviour consistent either with the continuous random model or with a microcrystalline model in which the average crystallite size appears to be no greater than about five molecular diameters, will be considered to be a glass. There are many methods to form glasses but glass formation referred to here will be confined to cooling from an inorganic melt of the same composition as the resultant glass.


Glass Formation Optical Glass Index Homogeneity Single Oxide Glass Preparation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Turnbull, “Under What Conditions can a Glass be Formed?” Comtemp Physics, 10, No. 5, 473–488 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Rawson, “Inorganic Glass Forming Systems”, Academic Press (1967).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Roy, “Gel Route to Homogeneous Glass Preparation”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 52, No. 6, 344, June (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. C. Potts, G. Brookover, and O. G. Burch, “Melting Rate of Soda-Lime Glasses as Influenced by Grain Sizes of Raw Materials and Additions of Cullet”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 27, No. 8, 225–231, (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. V. Tooley, M. A. Knight, A. K. Lyle, V. C. Swicker and A. Ottoson, Handbook of Glass Manufacture — Vol. I, Chapt. IX, Ogden Publishing Co. (1953).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. W. Deeg and C. G. Silverberg, “Performance of New All-Ceramic Glass Melter for Small-scale Production of Optical Glasses”, The Glass Industry, 164-167, April (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. F. Stirling and R. G. Miselbach, “A Technique for Improving the Homogeneity of Laboratory Melts”, Glass Technology, 9, No. 6, Dec. (1968).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Lell, “Synthesized Impurity Centers in Fused Silica” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 43, No. 8, 422–426, Aug. (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. D. Pearson, W. R. Northover, J. F. Dewald, and W. F. Peck, jr., “Chemical, Physical, and Electrical Properties of Some unusual Inorganic Glasses”, Advances in Glass Technology, Plenum Press (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. E. Hagy, “Fine Annealing of Optical Glass for Low Residual Stress and Refractive Index Homogeneity”, Applied Optics, 7, No. 5, May (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. E. Blair
    • 1
  1. 1.Kodak Apparatus Division Research LaboratoryEastman Kodak CompanyRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations