The Vitreous State

  • L. David Pye
Conference paper

An Overview

Glass is a versatile and sometimes enigmatic substance. It functions equally well as a carrier of light, a protector of man and his inventions, an object of art, or an indispensable tool for the exploration of science. Depending upon composition, it can be made stronger than steel1 or soluble in water; a detector of nuclear radiations2 or the source of a powerful laser beam.3,4 Certain compositions are known to possess either negative, zero or positive expansion coefficients. Still others are colorless or black, or even variable in their light transmissive properties. 5,6,7 Electrical conductivities can vary from 10-3 − 10-18 ohm-1 cm-1 with both electronic and ionic type mechanisms being clearly substantiated. Paramagnetic or diamagnetic glasses can also be made, depending again upon choice of composition. Given this enormous diversity of properties, it is clear as to why the use of glass might transcend many industries and fields of science. It is also found in nature. Terrestrial (obsidian), celestial (tektites) and more recently, lunar varieties have been identified.

By in large this diversity can be attributed to any or all of the following factors:
  1. 1)

    The composition of glasses may vary over wide limits and includes 60 of the chemical elements.

  2. 2)

    The properties of glass vary continuously with composition in a predictable manner. Among other things this means that unlike many crystalline substances, stoichiometry of a cooled glass is never a problem. In fact, that term is of little value in describing multicomponent glasses.

  3. 3)

    The internal energy of a glass is almost always greater than that corresponding to a crystalline phase of the same composition.

  4. 4)

    Glass is isotropic in its properties; it can be made extremely pure and homogeneous. It can also be fabricated into a variety of shapes and sizes.


Even without a complete and detailed knowledge of the structure of a cooled glass, the exploitation of the above factors is readily achieved by simply viewing glass as a substance somewhat continuous with its liquid state. This state, like all liquids, possesses a finite vapor pressure,8,9 a boiling point, a temperature dependent viscosity, and can be regarded as a solution of oxides or elements.

While at this liquid state, or at somewhat lower temperatures where conversion to a solid may ensue, many chemical reactions such as decomposition, oxidation-reduction, precipitation and/or dissolution, are readily achieved.10,11 For silicate systems, which are particularly viscous in their molten state, these reactions are very sensitive to time and temperature. Because these parameters are easily controlled, it is comparatively straight forward to start, halt, advance, or slow down these reactions as desired. Coupling this with a natural tendency for all glasses to revert to a lower energy crystalline state, gives rise to a highly desirable materials design capability. That is, as glassy solids convert to a crystalline phase(s), the properties of these solids will vary continously in a controllable manner from those associated with the parent glass to those characteristic of the crystalline phase.

All of these considerations constitute a powerful control feature for the fabrication of materials with specific properties within certain limits. In fact, the potential use of glass as a precursor for derivative materials represents an additional diversity unqiue in materials science.


Vitreous State Temperature Dependent Viscosity Expansion Curve Vitreous Silica Fictive Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Charles, R. J., “A Review of Glass Strength”, Progress in Ceramic Science, Vol. 1, 1961, Edited by J. E. Burke.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kreidl, N. J., Blair, G. E., “A System of Megaroentgen Glass Dosimetry”, Nucleonics, 45[1] 56–60 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pearson, A. D., Peterson, G. E., “Energy Exchange Processes and Laser Oscillation in Glasses”, Proceedings 7th Inter. Congr. Glass.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snitzer, E., “Glass Lasers”, Glass Industry, Vol. 48, 498–503 (1967).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, A. J., “Mechanisms in Variable Transmission Silicate Glasses”, Proceedings 7th Inter. Congr. Glass.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Armistead, W. H., Stookey, S. D., “Photochromic Silicate Glasses Sensitized by Silver Halides”, Science, Vol. 144, 150–154 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith, G. P., “Photochromic Silver Halide Glasses”, Proceedings 7th Inter. Congr. Glass.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradley, C. A., “Fume or Vapors from Molten Glass”, Bulletin of the Am. Ceram. Soc., 23[10] 379–381 (1944).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barlow, D. F., “Volatilization of Fluorides, Borates and Arsenic from Glass”, Proceedings 7th Inter. Congr. Glass.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weyl, W., Pincus, A. G., “The Role of Gases in Glass: I. Oxygen”, Glass Industry, 19, 255 (1938).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stookey, S. D., Maurer, R. D., “Catalyzed Crystallization of Glass — Theory and Practice”, Progress in Ceramic Science, Vol. 2 (1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morey, G. W., The Properties of Glass, 1st edition Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, p. 28 (1938).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stanworth, J. E., Physical Properties of Glass, Clarendon Press, Oxford, chap. 1 (1950).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Secrist, D. R., Mackenzie, J. D., Modern Aspects of the Vitreous State, Vol. 3, chap. 6, Butterworths, London (1960).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warren, B. E., “X-ray Diffraction of Vitreous Silica”, Z. Krist, 86, 349–358 (1933).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mott, N. F., “The Solid State”, Scientific American, 217[3] 80–89 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eckstein, B., “Vitreous States”, Mat. Res. Bull., 3, 199–208 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Charles, R. J., “The Nature of Glass”, Scientific American, 217[3] 127–136 (1967).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tool, A. Q., Eichlin, C. G., “Variations in Glass Caused by Heat Treatment”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 8[1] 1–17 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ritland, H. N., “Density Phenomena in the Transformation Range of a Borosilicate Crown Glass”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 37[8] 370–78 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tool, A. Q., Hill, E. E., “On the Constitution and Density of Glasses”, J. Soc. Glass Tech., 9, 185 (1925).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tool, A. Q., “Relation Between Inelastic Deformability and Thermal Expansion of Glasses in its Annealing Range”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 29[9] 240–53 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ritland, H. N., “Limitations of the Fictive Temperature Concept”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 39[12] 403–406 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bridgeman, P. W., Simon, I., “Effect of Very High Pressure on Glass”, J. Appl. Phys., 24[4] 405–13 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cohen, H. M., Roy, R., “Effects of Ultra High Pressures on Glass”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 44[10] 523–24 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mackenzie, J. D., “High Pressure Effects on Oxide Glasses: I, Densification in Rigid State”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 46[10] 461–70 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mackenzie, J. D., “High Pressure Effects on Oxide Glasses: III, Densification in Nonrigid State”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 47[2] 76–80 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weyl, W., Marboe, E. C., The Constitution of Glasses: A Dynamic Interpretation, Vol. I, chapter 13, 219, Interscience Publishers (1964).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turnbull, D., “Under What Conditions Can a Glass be Formed?”, Contemp. Phy., 10[5] 473–488 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sarjeant, P. T., Roy, R., “New Glassy and Polymorphic Oxide Phases Using Rapid Quenching Techniques”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 50[10] 500–503 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sarjeant, P. T., Roy, R., “A New Approach to the Prediction of Glass Formation”, Mat. Res. Bull., 3, 265–80 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goriunova, V. A., Kolomiets, B. T., and Shilo, V. P., “Vitreous Semiconductors”, Zuhr. Tekhn. Fiz., 28, 981 (1958).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mackenzie, J. D., in Modern Aspects of the Vitreous State, Vol. I, J. D. Mackenzie, ed., pp. 188–218, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stanworth, J. E., “The Ionic Structure of Glass”, J. Soc. Glass. Tech., 30, 54–64T (1946).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smekal, A. G., “On the Structure of Glass”, J. Soc. Glass Tech., 35., 411–420T (1951).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sun, H. K., “Fundamental Condition of Glass Formation”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 30, 277–81 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rawson, H., “The Relationship Between Liquidus Temperature Bond Strength and Glass Formation”, Proceedings IV Inter. Congr. Glass, Paris (1956).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rawson, H., Inorganic Glass Forming Systems, Academic Press, p. 26 (1967).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stookey, S. D., “Glass Chemistry as I Saw it”, Chem. Technol., 1, 458–465 (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. David Pye
    • 1
  1. 1.SUNY College of CeramicsAlfred UniversityAlfredUSA

Personalised recommendations