Skip to main content
  • 500 Accesses

Abstract

Biomass in its various forms is an attractive alternative source of energy. Through photosynthesis, biomass collects and stores low-intensity solar energy which can then be harvested at will and released through direct combustion, thermochemical conversion, or biochemical conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, The Outlook for Timber in the United States, Forest Resource Report No. 20, Washington, D.C. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Statistics of the U.S., 1977, Review Draft, Washington, D.C. (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Howlett and A. Gamache, Silvicultural Biomass Farms: Forest and Mill Residues as Potential Sources of Biomass, Vol. VI, MITRE Corporation/Metrek Division, Technical Report No. 7347, McLean, Va. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. Salo and J. F. Henry, Wood based biomass resources in the United States: Near term and long term prospects, in: Proceedings EPRI/GRI Workshop on Biomass Energy and Technology, Santa Clara, Ca. (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. H. Spurr and H. J. Vaux, Timber: Biological and economic potential, Science 191, 752 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. B. Grantham, Anticipated competition for available wood fuels in the United States, paper presented at the American Chemical Society Meeting (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. M. Herrick and C. L. Brown, A new concept in cellulose production—Silage Sycamore, Agri. Sci. Res. 5, 8 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. F. Dutrow, Economic Implications of Silage Sycamore, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Paper, Southern Forest Experiment Station New Orleans, La. (1971), pp. 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. E. Young, Wood Fiber Farming: An Ecologically Sound and Productive Use of Right-of-Ways, University of Maine, School of Forest Resources (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Steinbeck, J. T. May, and R. G. McAlpine, Silage cellulose—A new concept, in: Forest Engineering Conference Proceedings, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Saint Joseph, Michigan (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. Ribe, Will short-rotation forestry supply future pulpwood needs?, Pulp and Paper December (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. H. G. Smith and D. S. DeBell, Opportunities for short rotation culture and complete utilization of seven Northwestern tree species, Forestry Chronicle 49, 1 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. R. Larson and J. C. Gordon, Photosynthesis and wood yield, Agri. Sci. Rev. 7, 7–14 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. J. Schreiner, Mini-Rotation Forestry, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Res. Pap. NE-174, Northeast Forestry Experimental Station, Upper Darby, Pa. (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Steinbeck and J. T. May, Productivity of very young Platanus occidentalis Plantings Grown at Various Spacings, in: Forest Biomass Studies, University of Maine Press, Orano, Maine (1971), pp. 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Saucier, A. Clark, and R. G. McAlpine, Above ground biomass yields of short rotation sycamore, Wood Sci. 5, 1–6 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. H. Ribe, Will short-rotation forestry supply future pulpwood needs?, Pulp and Paper December (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. P. Belanger and J. R. Saucier, Intensive culture of hardwoods in the South, Iowa State J. Res. 49 (3), Part 2, 339–344 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. E. Kennedy, Jr., Influence of Cutting Cycle and Spacing on Coppice Sycamore Yield, U.S. Forest Service Research Note S.O.-193, Southern Forest Experimental Station, New Orleans (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Steinbeck, Short-rotation hardwood forestry in the southeast, in: Proceedings Second Annual Symposium on Fuels from Biomass (W. W. Shuster, ed.), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, June 20–22 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. P. Kormanik, G. L. Tyre, and R. P. Belanger, A case history of two short rotation coppice plantations of sycamore on southern piedmont bottomlands, in: IUFRO Biomass Studies, College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, Maine (1973), pp. 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Steinbeck, R. G. McAlpine, and J. T. May, Short rotation culture of sycamore: A status report, J. For. 70, 210–213 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Zavitkovski, Biomass Farms for Energy Production: Biological Considerations, SAF/CIF Convention, Proceedings, St. Louis, Missouri, October (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. R. Ek and J. P. Brodie, Preliminary analysis of short-rotation Aspen management, Can. J. For. Res. 5, 245–258 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D. F. W. Pollard, Above ground dry matter production in three stands of trembling Aspen, Can. J. For. Res. 2 (27), (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Doucet, Biomass d’un peuplement de peuplier faux tremble age de six ans, Que. Minist. Terres For. Serv. Rech. Note No. 7 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. B. Berry, Production of dry matter from aspen stands harvested on short rotations, in: IUFRD Biomass Studies (H. E. Young, ed.) College of Life Science and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, Me. (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Inter Group Consulting Economists, Ltd., Liquid Fuels from Renewable Resources: Feasibility Study, Volume C: Forest Studies, Report prepared for the Government of Canada, Interdepartmental Steering Committee on Canadian Liquid Fuels Program Options, Winnipeg, Manitoba, March (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. C. Carter and E. H. White, Dry weight and nutrient accumulation in young stands of cottonwood, Circular 190, Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. M. Krinard and R. L. Johnson, Ten-year results in a cottonwood spacing study, USDA Forest Service Research Paper 50-106, Southeastern Forest Exp. Station (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. F. L. Schmidt and D. S. DeBell, Wood production and kraft pulping of short rotation hardwoods in the Pacific Northwest, in: IUFRO Biomass Studies, (H. E. Young, ed.), Coll. of Life Sci. and Agri., Univ. of Maine, Orono, Maine (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. S. DeBell, Short rotation culture of hardwoods in the Pacific Northwest, Iowa State J. Res. 49 (3), Part 2, 345 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. E. Heilman, D. V. Peabody, D. S. DeBell, and R. F. Strand, A test of close-spaced short-rotation culture of black cottonwood, Can. J. For. Res. 2 (4), 456–459 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A. Musnier, Etude financiere et de gestion provisioneile des plantations et des fermes populicoles, Quebec Ministere des Terres et des Forets, Service de la Recherche, No. 31 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. R. Ek and D. H. Dawson, Yields of intensively grown populus: Actual and projected, in: Intensive Plantation Culture, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-21, N. Central For. Exp. Sta., Rhinelander, Wisconsin (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. W. Anderson and L. Zsuffa, Yield and Wood Quality of Hybrid Cottonwood Grown in 2-Year Rotation, Forest Research Report No. 101, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. W. Anderson and L. Zsuffa, Farming Hybrid Poplar for Food and Fiber, Forest Research Report No. 103, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. F. Laundrie and J. G. Berbee, High yield of kraft pulp from rapid growth hybrid poplar trees, Research Paper FPL 186, USDA Forest Service, Wisconsin (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. H. Dawson, J. G. Isebrandts, and J. C. Gordon, Growth and dry weight yields and specific gravity, Research Paper NC-122, USDA Forest Service (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  40. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intensive Plantation Culture, General Technical Report No. 21, North Central Forest Experiment Station (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  41. T. W. Bowersox and W. W. Ward, Growth and yield of close-spaced young hybrid poplars, For. Sci. 22 (4), (1976) pp. 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. B. Crist and D. H. Dawson, Anatomy and dry weight yields of two populus clones grown under intensive culture, USDA Forest Service Res. Paper NC-113, North Central Forest Exp. Sta., St. Paul, Minn. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  43. R. S. Evans, Energy plantations: Should we grow trees for power plant fuel?, Can. For. Serv., Dept. Environ., Rep. VP-X-129, Vancouver, B.C. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. H. G. Smith, Biomass of some young red alder stands, in: IUFRO Biomass Studies (H. E. Young, ed.), Coll. of Life Sci. and Agr., University of Maine, Orono, Maine (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. H. G. Smith and D. S. DeBell, Some effects of stand density on biomass of red alder, Can. J. For. Res. 4, 335–340 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. D. S. DeBeil, Potential productivity of dense young thickets of red alder, For. Res. Note No. 2, Crown Zellerbach Corp., Central Research, Camas, Wash. (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. Zavitkovski and R. D. Stevens, Primary productivity of red alder ecosystems, Ecology, 53 (2) (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. E. C. Franklin, and G. Meskimen, Wood properties of some eucalypts for the southern United States, in: Proceedings, 1975 National Convention, Society of American Foresters, Washington, D.C. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  49. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Cooperative Progress in Eucalypt Research, Southern Forest Exp. Station, Olustee, Florida (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  50. W. H. Smith, L. E. Nelson, and G. L. Switzer, Development of the shoot system of young loblolly pine, II. Dry matter and nutrient accumulation, For. Sci. 17 (1), 55 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  51. G. L. Switzer and L. E. Nelson, Nutrient accumulation and nutrient cycling in loblolly pine plantation ecosystems: The first twenty years, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 143–147 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. J. C. Nemeth, Dry Matter Production and Site Factors in Young Loblolly Pine and Slash Pine Plantations, Ph.D. Diss., North Carolina State University, Department of Botany, Raleigh, N.C. (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  53. C. W. Ralston, Annual primary productivity in a loblolly pine plantation, in: IUFRO Biomass Studies (H. E. Young, ed.), College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, Maine (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  54. W. R. Harms and O. G. Langdon, Development of loblolly pine in dense stands, For. Sci. 22, 331 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  55. G. Siren and G. Sivertsson, Survival and dry matter production of some high yield clones of salix and populus selected for forest industry and energy production, Royal Coll. For., Dep. Reforestation, Res. Note 83 Stockholm, Sweden (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Eucalyptus Study Intracompany memo, Fort Bragg, Ga. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  57. G. C. Szego and C. C. Kemp, Energy forests and fuel plantations, Chem Tech, 3 (5): 275–284 (May 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  58. J. A. Alich, Jr. and R. E. Inman, Effective Utilization of Solar Energy to Produce Clean Fuel, NSF/RANN/SE/GI/38723 Contract, SRI Project No. 2643, Menlo Park, Ca. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  59. C. L. Brown, Forests as energy sources in the year 2000: What man imagines, man can do, J. For. 74, 7 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  60. R. E. Inman, D. J. Salo, and B. J. McGurk, Silvicultural Biomass Farms, Vol. IV: Site-Specific Production Studies and Cost Analyses, MITRE Corporation/Metrek Division, MTR No. 7347 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Intertechnology/Solar Corporation, The Photosynthesis Energy Factory: Analysis, Synthesis and Demonstration, U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. EX-76-C-01-2548, Final Report, NTIS-HCP/T3548-01, Washington, D.C. (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  62. D. W. Rose, Cost of producing energy from wood in intensive culture, J. Environ. Manage. 5, 1 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  63. T. W. Bowersox and W. W. Ward, Economic analysis of a short rotation Fiber production system for hybrid poplar, J. For. 74, 750 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  64. R. E. Lohrey, Site preparation improves survival and growth of direct seeded pines, U.S. Forest Service Research Note 50-185, Southern Forest Exp. Station, New Orleans, La. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  65. R. P. Schultz, Intensive culture of southern pines: Maximum yields or short rotations, Iowa State J. Res. 49 (3), 325 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  66. J. S. McKnight, Planting cottonwood cuttings for timber production in the south, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Res. Paper 50-60 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  67. D. S. deBell and J. C. Harms, Identification of cost factors associated with intensive culture of forest crops, Iowa State J. Res. 50 (3), 295 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  68. R. Hunt, Effects of Site Preparation on Planted Sweetgum, Sycamore and Loblolly Pine on Upland Sites, Third Year Measurement Report, International Paper Company, Southlands Experiment Forest, Bainbridge, Ga. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  69. D. J. Salo, J. F. Henry, and R. E. Inman, Design of a Pilot Silvicultural Biomass Farm at the Savannah River Plant, ERDA Contract No. EG-77-C-01-4101, MITRE Corporation/Metrek Division, MTR-7960 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  70. D. J. Salo, J. F. Henry, and A. W. DeAgazio, Pilot Silvicultural Biomass Farm Layout and Design—Comparative Energetic and Cost Assessment of Irrigation Alternatives at The Savannah River Plant, ERDA Contract No. EG-77-C-01-4101, MITRE Corporation/Metrek Division, MTR-79W00102 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hansen, E. A., in: Intensive Plantation Culture (Five Years Research), USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-21, North Central Forest Exp. Station (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  72. J. R. Boyle, J. J. Phillips, and A. R. Ek, Whole tree harvesting: Nutrient budget evaluation, J. For. 71, 760 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  73. J. R. Boyle, Nutrients in relation to intensive culture of forest crops, Iowa State J. Res. 49 (3), pt2, 297 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. J. F. Henry, M. D. Fraser, W. B. Scholten, and C. W. Vail, Economics of energy crops on specific Northern California marginal crop lands, paper presented at the Fuels from Biomass Sympsoium, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, Ca. (August 3, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Inter Group Consulting Economists Ltd. Liquid Fuels from Renewable Resources: Feasibility Study, Vol. C: Forest Studies, report prepared for the Government of Canada, Interdepartmental Steering Committee on Canadian Renewable Liquid Fuels, Winnipeg, Manitoba (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  76. P. R. Blankenhorn, W. K. Murphey, and T. W. Bowersox, Energy Expended to Obtain Potentially Recoverable Energy from the Forests, Tappi Conference Papers, Forest Biology Wood Chemistry Conference, Madison, Wisconsin (June 20–22, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  77. E. S. Lipinsky, T. A. McClure, J. L. Otis, D. A. Scantland, and W. J. Sheppard, Systems Study of Fuels from Sugarcane, Sweet Sorghum, Sugar Beets and Corn, Vol. IV: Corn Agriculture, final Report, ERDA Contract No. W-7405-ENG-92, BMI-19574 A (Vol. IV) (March 31, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  78. D. Pimentel, Agricultural production: Resource needs and limitations, in: Transactions of the 40th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 1975, Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Federal Energy Administration, Project Independence Blueprint (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  80. D. J. Salo, R. E. Inman, B. J. McGurk, and J. Verhoeff, Silvicultural Biomass Farms, Volume III: Land Suitability and Availability, MITRE Corporation/Metrek Division, MTR 7347, McLean, Va. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  81. InterTechnology/Solar Corporation, Solar SNG: The Estimated Availability of Resources for Large Scale Production of SNG by Anaerobic Digestion of Specially Grown Plant Matter, Report No. 011075, American Gas Association, Project No. IU 114-1, Warrenton, Va. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  82. R. Didericksen, A. Hidlebaugh, and K. Schmede, Potential Cropland Study, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  83. B. F. Malac, and R. D. Heeren, Hardwood plantation management, Southern J. Appl. For. 3 (1), 3 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henry, J.F. (1981). Silvicultural Energy Farms. In: Sofer, S.S., Zaborsky, O.R. (eds) Biomass Conversion Processes for Energy and Fuels. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0301-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0301-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0303-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0301-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics